Add `implement_via_object` to `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` to control object candidate assembly
Some built-in traits are special, since they are used to prove facts about the program that are important for later phases of compilation such as codegen and CTFE. For example, the `Unsize` trait is used to assert to the compiler that we are able to unsize a type into another type. It doesn't have any methods because it doesn't actually *instruct* the compiler how to do this unsizing, but this is later used (alongside an exhaustive match of combinations of unsizeable types) during codegen to generate unsize coercion code.
Due to this, these built-in traits are incompatible with the type erasure provided by object types. For example, the existence of `dyn Unsize<T>` does not mean that the compiler is able to unsize `Box<dyn Unsize<T>>` into `Box<T>`, since `Unsize` is a *witness* to the fact that a type can be unsized, and it doesn't actually encode that unsizing operation in its vtable as mentioned above.
The old trait solver gets around this fact by having complex control flow that never considers object bounds for certain built-in traits:
2f896da247/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs (L61-L132)
However, candidate assembly in the new solver is much more lovely, and I'd hate to add this list of opt-out cases into the new solver. Instead of maintaining this complex and hard-coded control flow, instead we can make this a property of the trait via a built-in attribute. We already have such a build attribute that's applied to every single trait that we care about: `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`. This PR adds `implement_via_object` as a meta-item to that attribute that allows us to opt a trait out of object-bound candidate assembly as well.
r? `@lcnr`
Don't consider TAIT normalizable to hidden ty if it would result in impossible item bounds
See test for example where we shouldn't consider it possible to alias-relate a TAIT and hidden type.
r? `@lcnr`
Don't ICE on bound var in `reject_fn_ptr_impls`
We may try to use an impl like `impl<T: FnPtr> PartialEq {}` to satisfy a predicate like `for<T> T: PartialEq` -- don't ICE in that case.
Fixes#112735
Treat TAIT equation as always ambiguous in coherence
Not sure why we weren't treating all TAIT equality as ambiguous -- this behavior combined with `DefineOpaqueTypes::No` leads to coherence overlap failures, since we incorrectly consider impls as not overlapping because the obligation `T: From<Foo>` doesn't hold.
Fixes#112765
Continue folding in query normalizer on weak aliases
Fixes#112752Fixes#112731 (same root cause, so didn't make a test for it)
fixes#112776
r? ```@oli-obk```
Rewrite various resolve/diagnostics errors as translatable diagnostics
additional question:
For trivial strings is it ever accepted to use `fluent_generated::foo` in a `label` for example? Or is an empty struct `Diagnostic` preferred?
`#[test]` function signature verification improvements
This PR contains two improvements to the expansion of the `#[test]` macro.
The first one fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112360 by correctly recovering item statements if the signature verification fails.
The second one forbids non-lifetime generics on `#[test]` functions. These were previously allowed if the function returned `()`, but always caused an inference error:
before:
```text
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> src/lib.rs:2:1
|
1 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
2 | fn foo<T>() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type
```
after:
```text
error: functions used as tests can not have any non-lifetime generic parameters
--> src/lib.rs:2:1
|
2 | fn foo<T>() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Also includes some basic tests for test function signature verification, because I couldn't find any (???) in the test suite.
Don't record adjustments twice in `note_source_of_type_mismatch_constraint`
We call `lookup_method` a few times in `note_source_of_type_mismatch_constraint`, but that function has side-effects to the typeck results. Replace it with a less side-effect-y variant of the function for use in diagnostics.
Specifically the ICE in #112532 happens because we're recording deref adjustments twice for a call receiver, which causes `ExprUseVisitor` to be angry.
Fixes#112532
Don't capture `&[T; N]` when contents isn't read
Fixes the check in #111831Fixes#112607, although I decided to test the root cause rather than including the example in the issue as a test.
cc `@BoxyUwU`
Remove `box_free` lang item
This PR removes the `box_free` lang item, replacing it with `Box`'s `Drop` impl. Box dropping is still slightly magic because the contained value is still dropped by the compiler.
Add `AliasKind::Weak` for type aliases.
`type Foo<T: Debug> = Bar<T>;` does not check `T: Debug` at use sites of `Foo<NotDebug>`, because in contrast to a
```rust
trait Identity {
type Identity;
}
impl<T: Debug> Identity for T {
type Identity = T;
}
<NotDebug as Identity>::Identity
```
type aliases do not exist in the type system, but are expanded to their aliased type immediately when going from HIR to the type layer.
Similarly:
* a private type alias for a public type is a completely fine thing, even though it makes it a bit hard to write out complex times sometimes
* rustdoc expands the type alias, even though often times users use them for documentation purposes
* diagnostics show the expanded type, which is confusing if the user wrote a type alias and the diagnostic talks about another type that they don't know about.
For type alias impl trait, these issues do not actually apply in most cases, but sometimes you have a type alias impl trait like `type Foo<T: Debug> = (impl Debug, Bar<T>);`, which only really checks it for `impl Debug`, but by accident prevents `Bar<T>` from only being instantiated after proving `T: Debug`. This PR makes sure that we always check these bounds explicitly and don't rely on an implementation accident.
To not break all the type aliases out there, we only use it when the type alias contains an opaque type. We can decide to do this for all type aliases over an edition.
Or we can later extend this to more types if we figure out the back-compat concerns with suddenly checking such bounds.
As a side effect, easily allows fixing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108617, which I did.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108617
Handle interpolated literal errors
Not sure why it was doing a whole dance to re-match on the token kind when it seems like `Lit::from_token` does the right thing for both macro-arg and regular literals. Nothing seems to have regressed diagnostics-wise from the change, though.
Fixes#112622
r? ``@nnethercote``
Opportunistically resolve regions in new solver
Use `opportunistic_resolve_var` during canonicalization to collapse some regions.
We have to start using `CanonicalVarValues::is_identity_modulo_regions`. We also have to modify that function to consider responses like `['static, ^0, '^1, ^2]` to be an "identity" response, since because we opportunistically resolve regions, there's no longer a 1:1 mapping between canonical var values and bound var indices in the response...
There's one nasty side-effect -- one test (`tests/ui/dyn-star/param-env-infer.rs`) starts to ICE because the certainty goes from `Yes` to `Maybe(Overflow)`... Not exactly sure why, though? Putting this up for discussion/investigation.
r? ```@lcnr```
Instantiate closure synthetic substs in root universe
In the UI test example, we end up generalizing an associated type (something like `<Map<Option<i32>, [closure upvars=?0]> as IntoIterator>::Item` generalizes into `<Map<Option<i32>, [closure upvars=?1]> as IntoIterator>::Item`) then assigning it to itself, emitting an alias-relate goal. This trivially holds via one of the normalizes-to candidates, instead of relating substs, so when closure analysis eventually sets `?0` to the actual upvars, `?1` never gets constrained. This ends up being reported as an ambiguity error during writeback.
Instead, we can take advantage of the fact that we *know* the closure substs live in the root universe. This will prevent them being generalized, since they always can be named, and the alias-relate above never gets emitted at all.
We can probably do this to a handful of other `next_ty_var` calls in typeck for variables that are clearly associated with the body of the program, but I wanted to limit this for now. Eventually, if we end up representing universes more faithfully like a tree or whatever, we can remove this and turn it back to just a call to `next_ty_var`.
Note: This is incredibly order-dependent -- we need to be assigning a type variable that was created *before* the closure substs, and we also need to actually have an unnormalized type at the time of the assignment. This currently seems easiest to trigger during call argument analysis just due to the fact that we instantiate the call's substs, normalize, THEN check args.
r? ```@lcnr```
Extend `unused_must_use` to cover block exprs
Given code like
```rust
#[must_use]
fn foo() -> i32 {
42
}
fn warns() {
{
foo();
}
}
fn does_not_warn() {
{
foo()
};
}
fn main() {
warns();
does_not_warn();
}
```
### Before This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: 1 warning emitted
```
### After This PR
```
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:8:9
|
8 | foo();
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_must_use)]` on by default
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
8 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++
warning: unused return value of `foo` that must be used
--> test.rs:14:9
|
14 | foo()
| ^^^^^
|
help: use `let _ = ...` to ignore the resulting value
|
14 | let _ = foo();
| +++++++ +
warning: 2 warnings emitted
```
Fixes#104253.
Fix explicit-outlives-requirements lint span
Fixes#105150 which caused the span reported by the explicit-outlives-requirements lint to be incorrect when
1) the lint should suggest the entire where clause to be removed and
2) there are inline bounds present that are not inferable outlives requirements
In particular, this would cause rustfix to leave a dangling empty where clause.
