Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97312 (Compute lifetimes in scope at diagnostic time)
- #97495 (Add E0788 for improper #[no_coverage] usage)
- #97579 (Avoid creating `SmallVec`s in `global_llvm_features`)
- #97767 (interpret: do not claim UB until we looked more into variadic functions)
- #97787 (E0432: rust 2018 -> rust 2018 or later in --explain message)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
interpret: better control over whether we read data with provenance
The resolution in https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/286 seems to be that when we load data at integer type, we implicitly strip provenance. So let's implement that in Miri at least for scalar loads. This makes use of the fact that `Scalar` layouts distinguish pointer-sized integers and pointers -- so I was expecting some wild bugs where layouts set this incorrectly, but so far that does not seem to happen.
This does not entirely implement the solution to https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/286; we still do the wrong thing for integers in larger types: we will `copy_op` them and then do validation, and validation will complain about the provenance. To fix that we need mutating validation; validation needs to strip the provenance rather than complaining about it. This is a larger undertaking (but will also help resolve https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/845 since we can reset padding to `Uninit`).
The reason this is useful is that we can now implement `addr` as a `transmute` from a pointer to an integer, and actually get the desired behavior of stripping provenance without exposing it!
interpret: do not claim UB until we looked more into variadic functions
I am not actually sure if this is UB, and anyway for FFI shims, Miri currently does not attempt to distinguish between arguments passed via variadics vs directly. So let's be consistent.
(Programs that ran into this error will anyway immediately fall through to the "unsupported" message on the next line.)
Avoid creating `SmallVec`s in `global_llvm_features`
This PR made a simple optimization to avoid creating extra `SmallVec`s by adjusting the use of iterator statements.
Also, given the very small size of `tied_target_features`, there is no need to insert each feature into the FxHashMap.
Add E0788 for improper #[no_coverage] usage
Essentially, this adds proper checking for the attribute (tracking issue #84605) and throws errors when it's put in obviously-wrong places, like on struct or const definitions. Most of the code is taken directly from the checks for the `#[inline]` attribute, since it's very similar.
Right now, the code only checks at the function level, but it seems reasonable to allow adding `#[no_coverage]` to individual blocks or expressions, so, for now those just throw `unused_attributes` warnings. Similarly, since there was a lot of desire to eventually allow recursive definitions as well on modules and impl blocks, these also throw `unused_attributes` instead of an error.
I'm not sure if anything has to be done since this error is technically for an unstable feature, but since an error for using unstable features will show up anyway, I think it's okay.
This is the first big piece needed for stabilising this attribute, although I personally would like to explore renaming it to `#[coverage(never)]` on a separate PR, which I will offer soon. There's a lot of discussion still to be had about that, which is why it will be kept separate.
I don't think much is needed besides adding this simple check and a UI test, but let me know if there's something else that should be added to make this happen.
Compute lifetimes in scope at diagnostic time
The set of available lifetimes is currently computed during lifetime resolution on HIR. It is only used for one diagnostic.
In this PR, HIR lifetime resolution just reports whether elided lifetimes are well-defined at the place of use. The diagnostic code is responsible for building a list of lifetime names if elision is not allowed.
This will allow to remove lifetime resolution on HIR eventually.
Do `suggest_await_before_try` with infer variables in self, and clean up binders
Fixes#97704
Also cleans up binders in this fn, since everything is a `Poly*` and we really shouldn't have stray escaping late-bound regions everywhere. That's why the function changed so much. This isn't necessary, so I can revert if necessary.
Replace `&Vec<_>`s with `&[_]`s
It's generally preferable to use `&[_]` since it's one less indirection and it can be created from types other that `Vec`.
I've left `&Vec` in some locals where it doesn't really matter, in cases where `TypeFoldable` is expected (`TypeFoldable: Clone` so slice can't implement it) and in cases where it's `&TypeAliasThatIsActiallyVec`. Nothing important, really, I was just a little annoyed by `visit_generic_param_vec` :D
r? `@compiler-errors`
riscv32imac-unknown-xous-elf: add target
This PR starts the process of upstreaming support for our operating system, thanks to a suggestion from `@yaahc` [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1530558574706839567?s=20&t=Mgkn1LEYvGU6FEi5SpZRsA). We have maintained a fork of Rust and have made changes to improve support for our platform since Rust 1.51. Now we would like to upstream these changes.
Xous is a microkernel operating system designed to run on small systems. The kernel contains a wide range of userspace processes that provide common services such as console output, networking, and time access.
The kernel and its services are completely written in Rust using a custom build of libstd. This adds support for this target to upstream Rust so that we can drop support for our out-of-tree `target.json` file.
This first patch adds a Tier 3 target for Xous running on RISC-V. Future patches will add libstd support, but those patches require changes to `dlmalloc` and `compiler_builtins`.
> Tier 3 policy:
>
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I will be the target maintainer for this target on matters that pertain to the `xous` part of the triple. For matters pertaining to the `riscv32imac` part of the triple, there should be no difference from all other `riscv` targets. If there are issues, I will address issues regarding the target.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
This is a new OS, so I have taken the `riscv32imac-unknown-none-elf` target and changed the `os` section of the triple. This follows convention on targets such as `riscv32gc-unknown-linux-gnu` and `mipsel-unknown-linux-uclibc`. An argument could be made for omitting the `-elf` section of the triple, such as `riscv32imc-esp-espidf`, however I'm not certain what benefit that has.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
I feel that the target name does not introduce any ambiguity.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
The only unusual requirement for building the `compiler-builtins` crate is a standard RISC-V C compiler supported by `cc-rs`, and using this target does not require any additional software beyond what is shipped by `rustup`.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
All of the additional code will use Apache-2.0.
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Agreed, and there is no problem here.
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
The only new dependency will be the `xous` crate, which is licensed `MIT OR Apache-2.0`
> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
Linking is performed by `rust-lld`
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
There are no terms. Xous is completely open. It runs on open hardware. We even provide the source to the CPU.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
This paragraph makes sense, but I don't think it's directed at me.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
This paragraph also does not appear to be directed at me.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
So far we have:
* Thread
* Mutexex
* Condvar
* TcpStream
* TcpListener
* UdpSocket
* DateTime
* alloc
These will be merged as part of libstd in a future patch once I submit support for Xous in `dlmalloc` and `compiler-builtins`.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Testing is currently done on real hardware or in a Renode emulator. I can add documentation on how to do this in a future patch, and I would need instructions on where to add said documentation.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Alright.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Sounds good.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
This shouldn't affect any other targets, so this is understood.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
This shouldn't come up right away. `xous` is a new operating system, and most features are keyed off of `target(os = "xous")` rather than a given architecture.
Handle more cases in cfg_accessible
This PR tries to handle more cases in the cfg_accessible implementation by only emitting a "not sure" error only if we have partially resolved a path.
This PR also adds many tests for the "not sure" cases and for private items.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Improve soundness of rustc_data_structures
Make it runnable in miri by adding some ignores and changing N in miri. Also fix a stacked borrows issue in sip128.
Iterate over `maybe_unused_trait_imports` when checking dead trait imports
Closes#96873
r? `@cjgillot`
Some questions, if you have time:
- Is there a way to shorten the `rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet` path in the query declaration? I wasn't sure where to put a `use`.
- Was returning by reference from the query the right choice here?
- How would I go about evaluating the importance of the `is_dummy()` call in `check_crate`? I don't see failing tests when I comment it out. Should I just try to determine whether dummy spans can ever be put into `maybe_unused_trait_imports`?
- Am I doing anything silly with the various ID types?
- Is that `let-else` with `unreachable!()` bad? (i.e is there a better idiom? Would `panic!("<explanation>")` be better?)
- If I want to evaluate the perf of using a `Vec` as mentioned in #96873, is the best way to use the CI or is it feasible locally?
Thanks :)
It creates the src pointer first, which is then invalidated by a
unique borrow of the destination pointer. Swap the borrows around
to fix this. Found with miri.
Some tests took too long and owning_ref is fundamentally flawed,
so don't run these tests or run them with a shorter N. This makes
miri with `-Zmiri-strict-provenance` usable to find UB.
Xous is a microkernel operating system designed to run on small systems.
The kernel contains a wide range of userspace processes that provide
common services such as console output, networking, and time access.
The kernel and its services are completely written in Rust using a
custom build of libstd. This adds support for this target to upstream
Rust so that we can drop support for our out-of-tree `target.json` file.
Add a Tier 3 target for Xous running on RISC-V.
Signed-off-by: Sean Cross <sean@xobs.io>
Fix reachability analysis for const methods
Use `method_might_be_inlined` directly for `ImplItemKind::Fn` instead of duplicating the logic in `def_id_represents_local_inlined_item`.
This is parallel to how we use `item_might_be_inlined` for `ItemKind::Fn` in that same body.
Fixes#97708
