Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
Add ability to transmute (somewhat) with generic consts in arrays
Previously if the expression contained generic consts and did not have a directly equivalent type, transmuting the type in this way was forbidden, despite the two sizes being identical. Instead, we should be able to lazily tell if the two consts are identical, and if so allow them to be transmuted.
This is done by normalizing the forms of expressions into sorted order of multiplied terms, which is not generic over all expressions, but should handle most cases.
This allows for some _basic_ transmutations between types that are equivalent in size without requiring additional stack space at runtime.
I only see one other location at which `SizeSkeleton` is being used, and it checks for equality so this shouldn't affect anywhere else that I can tell.
See [this Stackoverflow post](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/73085012/transmute-nested-const-generic-array-rust) for what was previously necessary to convert between types. This PR makes converting nested `T -> [T; 1]` transmutes possible, and `[uB*2; N] -> [uB; N * 2]` possible as well.
I'm not sure whether this is something that would be wanted, and if it is it definitely should not be insta-stable, so I'd add a feature gate.
Previously if the expression contained generic consts and did not have a directly equivalent
type, transmuting the type in this way was forbidden, despite the two sizes being identical.
Instead, we should be able to lazily tell if the two consts are identical, and if so allow them
to be transmuted.
Fixes#109543. When checking paths in HIR typeck, we don't want to check
for const predicates since all we want might just be a function pointer.
Therefore we move this to MIR constck and check that bounds are met
during MIR constck.
Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched
When equating two consts of different types, if either are const variables, constrain them to the correct const error kind.
This helps us avoid "successfully" matching a const against an impl signature but leaving unconstrained const vars, which will lead to incremental ICEs when we call const-eval queries during const projection.
Fixes#109296
The second commit in the stack fixes a regression in the first commit where we end up mentioning `[const error]` in an impl overlap error message. I think the error message changes for the better, but I could implement alternative strategies to avoid this without delaying the overlap error message...
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Consider `tests/ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/issue-102768.stderr`,
the error message where it gives additional notes about where the associated
type is defined, and how the dead code lint doesn't have an article,
like in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/issue-85255.stderr`. They don't have
articles, so it seems unnecessary to have one here.
Most tests involving save-analysis were removed, but I kept a few where
the `-Zsave-analysis` was an add-on to the main thing being tested,
rather than the main thing being tested.
For `x.py install`, the `rust-analysis` target has been removed.
For `x.py dist`, the `rust-analysis` target has been kept in a
degenerate form: it just produces a single file `reduced.json`
indicating that save-analysis has been removed. This is necessary for
rustup to keep working.
Closes#43606.
use semantic equality for const param type equality assertion
Fixes#107898
See added test for what caused this ICE
---
The current in assertion in `relate.rs` is rather inadequate when keeping in mind future expansions to const generics:
- it will ICE when there are infer vars in a projection in a const param ty
- it will spurriously return false when either ty has infer vars because of using `==` instead of `infcx.at(..).eq`
- i am also unsure if it would be possible with `adt_const_params` to craft a situation where the const param type is not wf causing `normalize_erasing_regions` to `bug!` when we would have emitted a diagnostic.
This impl feels pretty Not Great to me although i am not sure what a better idea would be.
- We have to have the logic behind a query because neither `relate.rs` or `combine.rs` have access to trait solving machinery (without evaluating nested obligations this assert will become _far_ less useful under lazy norm, which consts are already doing)
- `relate.rs` does not have access to canonicalization machinery which is necessary in order to have types potentially containing infer vars in query arguments.
We could possible add a method to `TypeRelation` to do this assertion rather than a query but to avoid implementing the same logic over and over we'd probably end up with the logic in a free function somewhere in `rustc_trait_selection` _anyway_ so I don't think that would be much better.
We could also just remove this assertion, it should not actually be necessary for it to be present. It has caught some bugs in the past though so if possible I would like to keep it.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Add ui test for implementation on projection
The error in full can be seen in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107263 and is part of why the PR is blocked (it still requires the approval from the team for supporting it).
r? ``@oli-obk``
Modify primary span label for E0308
Looking at the reactions to https://hachyderm.io/`@ekuber/109622160673605438,` a lot of people seem to have trouble understanding the current output, where the primary span label on type errors talks about the specific types that diverged, but these can be deeply nested type parameters. Because of that we could see "expected i32, found u32" in the label while the note said "expected Vec<i32>, found Vec<u32>". This understandably confuses people. I believe that once people learn to read these errors it starts to make more sense, but this PR changes the output to be more in line with what people might expect, without sacrificing terseness.
Fix#68220.
Remove overlapping parts of multipart suggestions
This PR adds a debug assertion that the parts of a single substitution cannot overlap, fixes a overlapping substitution from the testsuite, and fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106870.
Note that a single suggestion can still have multiple overlapping substitutions / possible edits, we just don't suggest overlapping replacements in a single edit anymore.
I've also included a fix for an unrelated bug where rustfix for `explicit_outlives_requirements` would produce multiple trailing commas for a where clause.
Recover from more const arguments that are not wrapped in curly braces
Recover from some array, borrow, tuple & arithmetic expressions in const argument positions that lack curly braces and provide a suggestion to fix the issue continuing where #92884 left off. Examples of such expressions: `[]`, `[0]`, `[1, 2]`, `[0; 0xff]`, `&9`, `("", 0)` and `(1 + 2) * 3` (we previously did not recover from them).
I am not entirely happy with my current solution because the code that recovers from `[0]` (coinciding with a malformed slice type) and `[0; 0]` (coinciding with a malformed array type) is quite fragile as the aforementioned snippets are actually successfully parsed as types by `parse_ty` since it itself already recovers from them (returning `[⟨error⟩]` and `[⟨error⟩; 0]` respectively) meaning I have to manually look for `TyKind::Err`s and construct a separate diagnostic for the suggestion to attach to (thereby emitting two diagnostics in total).
Fixes#81698.
`@rustbot` label A-diagnostics
r? diagnostics
