some general mir typeck cleanup
this pr contains the parts of #95763 which already work correctly.
the remaining commits of that PR have some issues which are more complex to fix.
r? types
Mention `as_mut` alongside `as_ref` in borrowck error message
Kinda fixes#99426 but I guess that really might be better staying open to see if we could make it suggest `as_mut` in a structured way. Not sure how to change borrowck to know that info tho.
Enable unused_parens for match arms
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92751
Currently I can't get the `stderr` to work with `./x.py test`, but this should fix the issue. Help would be appreciated!
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #98771 (Add support for link-flavor rust-lld for iOS, tvOS and watchOS)
- #98835 (relate `closure_substs.parent_substs()` to parent fn in NLL)
- #99746 (Use `TraitEngine` in more places that don't specifically need `FulfillmentContext::new_in_snapshot`)
- #99786 (Recover from C++ style `enum struct`)
- #99795 (Delay a bug when failed to normalize trait ref during specialization)
- #100029 (Prevent ICE for `doc_alias` on match arm, statement, expression)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Check that RPITs constrained by a recursive call in a closure are compatible
Fixes#99073
Adapts a similar visitor pattern to `find_opaque_ty_constraints` (that we use to check TAITs), but with some changes:
0. Only walk the "OnlyBody" children, instead of all items in the RPIT's defining scope
1. Only walk through the body's children if we found a constraining usage
2. Don't actually do any inference, just do a comparison and error if they're mismatched
----
r? `@oli-obk` -- you know all this impl-trait stuff best... is this the right approach? I can explain the underlying issue better if you'd like, in case that might reveal a better solution. Not sure if it's possible to gather up the closure's defining usages of the RPIT while borrowck'ing the outer function, that might be a better place to put this check...
Use full type name instead of just saying `impl Trait` in "captures lifetime" error
I think this is very useful, especially when there's >1 `impl Trait`, and it just means passing around a bit more info that we already have access to.
Remove the unused StableSet and StableMap types from rustc_data_structures.
The current implementation is not "stable" in the same sense that `HashStable` and `StableHasher` are stable, i.e. across compilation sessions. So, in my opinion, it's better to remove those types (which are basically unused anyway) than to give the wrong impression that these are safe for incr. comp.
I plan to provide new "stable" collection types soon that can be used to replace `FxHashMap` and `FxHashSet` in query results (see [draft](69d03ac7a7)). It's unsound that `HashMap` and `HashSet` implement `HashStable` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98890 for a recent P-critical bug caused by this) -- so we should make some progress there.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #98101 (stdlib support for Apple WatchOS)
- #99345 (Do not allow typeck children items to constrain outer RPITs)
- #99383 (Formalize defining_use_anchor)
- #99436 (Add flag to configure `noalias` on `Box<T>`)
- #99483 (Fix a numerical underflow in tuple wrap suggestion)
- #99485 (Stop injecting `#[allow(unused_qualifications)]` in generated `derive` implementations)
- #99486 (Refactor: remove a string comparison between types in `check_str_addition`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Formalize defining_use_anchor
This tackles issue #57961
Introduces new enum called `DefiningAnchor` that replaces `Option<LocalDefId>` of `defining_use_anchor`. Now every use of it is explicit and exhaustively matched, catching errors like one in the linked issue. This is not a perfect fix but it's a step in the right direction.
r? `@oli-obk`
`arena > Rc` for query results
The `Rc`s have to live for the whole duration as their count cannot go below 1 while stored as part of the query results.
By storing them in an arena we should save a bit of memory because we don't have as many independent allocations and also don't have to clone the `Rc` anymore.
