Remove special-casing for argument patterns in MIR typeck (attempt to fix perf regression of #133858)
See [my comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133858#issuecomment-2579029618) on #133858 for more information. This is just a guess as to what went wrong, and I haven't been able to get the profiler running locally, so I'll need a perf run to make sure this actually helps.
There's one test's stderr that suffers a bit, but this was just papering over the issue anyway. Making region errors point to the correct constraints in the presence of invariance/contravariance is a broader problem; the current way it's handled is mostly based on guesswork, luck, and hoping it works out. Properly handling that (somehow) would improve the test's stderr without the hack that this PR reverts.
Make sure to walk into nested const blocks in `RegionResolutionVisitor`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135306
I tried auditing the rest of the visitors that called `.visit_body`, and it seems like this is the only one that was missing it. I wonder if we should modify intravisit (specifcially, that `NestedBodyFilter` stuff) to make this less likely to happen, tho...
r? oli-obk
`-Zrandomize-layout` harder. `Foo<T> != Foo<U>`
Tracking issue: #106764
Previously randomize-layout only used a deterministic shuffle based on the seed stored in an Adt's ReprOptions, meaning that `Foo<T>` and `Foo<U>` were shuffled by the same seed. This change adds a similar seed to each calculated LayoutData so that a struct can be randomized both based on the layout of its fields and its per-type seed.
Primitives start with simple seed derived from some of their properties. Though some types can no longer be distinguished at that point, e.g. usize and u64 will still be treated the same.
previously field ordering was using the same seed for all instances of Foo,
now we pass seed values through the layout tree so that not only
the struct itself affects layout but also its fields
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134898 (Make it easier to run CI jobs locally)
- #135195 (Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible)
- #135261 (Account for identity substituted items in symbol mangling)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible
My motivation for this change is just that it's annoying to check everywhere, especially since all but one call site was just ICEing on errors anyway right there.
They can still fail, but now just return an error constant instead of having the caller handle the error.
fixes#114317fixes#126182
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135212 (Remove outdated information in the `unreachable_pub` lint description)
- #135225 (Explicitly build proc macro test with panic=unwind)
- #135242 (add missing provenance APIs on NonNull)
- #135247 (Add a list of symbols for stable standard library crates)
- #135269 (Remove some unnecessary `.into()` calls)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add a list of symbols for stable standard library crates
There are a few locations where the crate name is checked against an enumerated list of `std`, `core`, `alloc`, and `proc_macro`, or some subset thereof. In most cases when we are looking for any "standard library" crate, all four crates should be treated the same. Change this so the crates are listed in one place, and that list is used wherever a list of `std` crates is needed.
`test` could be considered relevant in some of these cases, but generally treating it separate from the others seems preferable while it is unstable.
There are also a few places that Clippy will be able to use this.
Explicitly build proc macro test with panic=unwind
Fuchsia explicitly builds rust and all rust targets with `-C panic=abort` to minimize code generation size. However, when compiling a proc-macro with this setting it can cause a warning to be emitted, which breaks `tests/ui/invalid-compile-flags/crate-type-flag.rs`. This hasn't been a problem in the past for us since we compile our proc macros on host, rather than inside Fuchsia.
This attempts to fix the issue by explicitly requiring that we're using the unwinder when compiling this test to avoid the warning being emitted.
Fixes#135223
Remove outdated information in the `unreachable_pub` lint description
As far as I understand the `unreachable_pub` lint hasn't had false-positives since it started using "effective visibilities". Let's remove that warning from the lint description.
r? `@petrochenkov`
[mir-opt] GVN some more transmute cases
We already did `Transmute`-then-`PtrToPtr`; this adds the nearly-identical `PtrToPtr`-then-`Transmute`.
It also adds `transmute(Foo(x))` → `transmute(x)`, when `Foo` is a single-field transparent type. That's useful for things like `NonNull { pointer: p }.as_ptr()`. It also detects when a `Transmute` is just an identity-for-the-value `PtrCast` between different raw pointer types, to help such things fold with other GVN passes.
Found these as I was looking at <https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/807>-related changes. This also removes the questionably-useful "turn a transmute into a field projection" part of instsimplify (which I added ages ago without an obvious need for it) since that would just put back the field projections that MCP807 is trying to ban.
r? mir-opt
Implement `const Destruct` in old solver
Self-explanatory. Not totally settled that this is the best structure for built-in trait impls for effect goals in the new solver, but it's almost certainly the simplest.
r? lcnr or re-roll
Add new `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-gnu` targets
These are in symmetry with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`.
> ## Tier 3 target policy
>
> At this tier, the Rust project provides no official support for a target, so we
> place minimal requirements on the introduction of targets.
>
> A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the
> compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge
> broader compiler team consensus via a [Major Change Proposal (MCP)][https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html].
>
> A proposed target or target-specific patch that substantially changes code
> shared with other targets (not just target-specific code) must be reviewed and
> approved by the appropriate team for that shared code before acceptance.
>
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
This is me, `@tbu-` on github.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
Consistent with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`, see also #118150.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
AFAICT, it's the same legal situation as the tier 1 `{x86_64,i686}-pc-windows-gnu`.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
This target supports the whole libstd surface, since it's essentially reusing all of the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target. Understood.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
I tried to write some documentation on that.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
> - Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of
> rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork
> of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
Understood.
> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers
> no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and
> has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality
> of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed
> to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously
> worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
>
Understood.
r? compiler-team
Suggest Replacing Comma with Semicolon in Incorrect Repeat Expressions
Fixes#80173
This PR detects typos in repeat expressions like `["_", 10]` and `vec![String::new(), 10]` and suggests replacing comma with semicolon.
Also, improves code in other place by adding doc comments and making use of a helper function to check if a type implements `Clone`.
References:
1. For `vec![T; N]`: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macro.vec.html
2. For `[T; N]`: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.array.html
We already did `Transmute`-then-`PtrToPtr`; this adds the nearly-identical `PtrToPtr`-then-`Transmute`.
It also adds `transmute(Foo(x))` → `transmute(x)`, when `Foo` is a single-field transparent type. That's useful for things like `NonNull { pointer: p }.as_ptr()`.
Found these as I was looking at MCP807-related changes.
There are a few locations where the crate name is checked against an
enumerated list of `std`, `core`, `alloc`, and `proc_macro`, or some
subset thereof. In most of these cases, all four crates should likely be
treated the same. Change this so the crates are listed in one place, and
that list is used wherever a list of `std` crates is needed.
`test` could be considered relevant in some of these cases, but
generally treating it separate from the others seems preferable while it
is unstable.
There are also a few places that Clippy will be able to use this.
Fuchsia explicitly builds rust and all rust targets with `-C
panic=abort` to minimize code generation size. However, when compiling a
proc-macro with this setting it can cause a warning to be emitted, which
breaks `tests/ui/invalid-compile-flags/crate-type-flag.rs`. This hasn't
been a problem in the past for us since we compile our proc macros on
host, rather than inside Fuchsia.
This attempts to fix the issue by explicitly requiring that we're using
the unwinder when compiling this test to avoid the warning being
emitted.
Fixes#135223
A couple simple borrowck cleanups
This PR has a couple simple renamings:
- it's been a long time since the mapping from `Location`s to `PointIndex`es was extracted from `RegionElements` into the `DenseLocationMap`, but only the types were renamed at the time. borrowck still refers to this map as `elements`. That's confusing, especially since sometimes we also use the mapping via `LivenessValues`, and makes more sense as `location_map` instead.
- to clarify `LocationTable` is not as general as it sounds, and is only for datalog polonius. In this branch I didn't rename the handful of `location_table` fields and params to `polonius_table`, but can do that to differentiate it even more from `location_map`. I did try it locally and it looks worthwhile, so if you'd prefer I can also push it here. (Or we could even switch these datalog types and fields to even more explicit names)
- to clarify the incomprehensible `AllFacts`, it is renamed to `PoloniusFacts`. These can be referred to as `facts` within the legacy polonius module, but as `polonius_facts` outside of it to make it clear that they're not about NLLs (nor are they about in-tree polonius but that'll be magically fixed when they're removed in the future)
r? `@matthewjasper`
Exhaustively handle expressions in patterns
We currently have this invariant in HIR that a `PatKind::Lit` or a `PatKind::Range` only contains
* `ExprKind::Lit`
* `ExprKind::UnOp(Neg, ExprKind::Lit)`
* `ExprKind::Path`
* `ExprKind::ConstBlock`
So I made `PatKind::Lit` and `PatKind::Range` stop containing `Expr`, and instead created a `PatLit` type whose `kind` enum only contains those variants.
The only place code got more complicated was in clippy, as it couldn't share as much anymore with `Expr` handling
It may be interesting on merging `ExprKind::{Path,Lit,ConstBlock}` in the future and using the same `PatLit` type (under a new name).
Then it should also be easier to eliminate any and all `UnOp(Neg, Lit) | Lit` matching that we have across the compiler. Some day we should fold the negation into the literal itself and just store it on the numeric literals
Its original naming hides the fact that it's related to datalog
polonius, and bound to be deleted in the near future.
It also conflicts with the expected name for the actual NLL location
map, and prefixing it with its use will make the differentiation
possible.
