Add a test to ensure issue #89699 does not show up again. This test
emits an `async move` closure in a proc macro, which is used in a
test program compiled with edition 2015. We make sure the error message
is nice and shows up properly.
Add a note to duplicate diagnostics
Helps explain why there may be a difference between manual testing and the test suite output and highlights them as something to potentially look into
For existing duplicate diagnostics I just blessed them other than a few files that had other `NOTE` annotations in
Properly print cstr literals in `proc_macro::Literal::to_string`
Previously we printed the contents of the string, rather than the actual string literal (e.g. `the c string` instead of `c"the c string"`).
Fixes#112820
cc #105723
without this, the only way to create a `LitKind::Byte` is by
doing `"b'a'".parse::<Literal>()`, this solves that by enabling
`Literal::byte_character(b'a')`
feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventions
Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g.
```rust
static mut CNT: usize = 0;
pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() {
unsafe {
CNT += 1;
}
}
```
to produce highly effective assembly like:
```asm
pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() {
420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16
unsafe {
CNT += 1;
420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp)
420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp)
420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80
420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0>
420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1
420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0)
}
}
420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp)
420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp)
420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16
420003ba: 30200073 mret
```
(disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`)
This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill.
At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`).
This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc].
Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts.
Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades).
[clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v
[full-frame-save]: 9281af2ecf/src/lib.rs (L440-L469)
[implemented by]: b7fb2a3fec/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp (L61-L67)
[callee-save]: 973f1fe7a8/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td (L30-L37)
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
The change in 07f855d781 introduced a
trailing numeral of some kind after the `extern crate
compiler_builtins`, which appears to have caused at least two false
negatives (654b924 and 657fd24). Instead, this change normalizes the
test output to ignore the number (of symbols rustc recognizes?) to avoid
needing to re-`--bless` these two tests for unrelated changes.
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just its two symbols
Restrict linker version script of proc-macro crates to just the two symbols of each proc-macro crate.
The main known effect of doing this is to stop including `#[no_mangle]` symbols in the linker version script.
Background:
The combination of a proc-macro crate with an import of another crate that itself exports a no_mangle function was broken for a period of time, because:
* In PR #99944 we stopped exporting no_mangle symbols from proc-macro crates; proc-macro crates have a very limited interface and are meant to be treated as a blackbox to everything except rustc itself. However: he constructed linker version script still referred to them, but resolving that discrepancy was left as a FIXME in the code, tagged with issue #99978.
* In PR #108017 we started telling the linker to check (via the`--no-undefined-version` linker invocation flag) that every symbol referenced in the "linker version script" is provided as linker input. So the unresolved discrepancy from #99978 started surfacing as a compile-time error (e.g. #111888).
Fix#111888Fix#99978.
Add separate feature gate for async fn track caller
This patch adds a feature gate `async_fn_track_caller` that is separate from `closure_track_caller`. This is to allow enabling `async_fn_track_caller` separately.
Fixes#110009
This patch adds a feature gate `async_fn_track_caller` that is separate from `closure_track_caller`. This is to allow enabling `async_fn_track_caller` separately.
Fixes#110009
tests/ui/proc-macro/*: Migrate FIXMEs to check-pass
proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.
I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the test.
I skipped changing `tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs` in this commit because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.
Part of #62277
proc-macros are processed early in the compiler pipeline. There is no
need to involve codegen. So change to check-pass.
I have also looked through each changed test and to me it is
sufficiently clear that codegen is not needed for the purpose of the
test.
I skipped changing tests/ui/proc-macro/no-missing-docs.rs in this commit
because it was not clear to me that it can be changed to check-pass.
This crate is a private implementation detail. We only need to insert it
into the crate graph for linking and should not expose any of its public
API.
Fixes#113533
Make compiletest aware of targets without dynamic linking
Some parts of the compiletest internals and some tests require dynamic linking to work, which is not supported by all targets. Before this PR, this was handled by if branches matching on the target name.
This PR loads whether a target supports dynamic linking or not from the target spec, and adds a `// needs-dynamic-linking` attribute for tests that require it. Note that I was not able to replace all the old conditions based on the target name, as some targets have `dynamic_linking: true` in their spec but pretend they don't have it in compiletest.
Also, to get this to work I had to *partially* revert #111472 (cc `@djkoloski` `@tmandry` `@bjorn3).` On one hand, only the target spec contains whether a target supports dynamic linking, but on the other hand a subset of the fields can be overridden through `-C` flags (as far as I'm aware only `-C panic=$strategy`). The solution I came up with is to take the target spec as the base, and then override the panic strategy based on `--print=cfg`. Hopefully that should not break y'all again.
Suggest publicly accessible paths for items in private mod:
When encountering a path in non-import situations that are not reachable
due to privacy constraints, search for any public re-exports that the
user could use instead.
Track whether an import suggestion is offering a re-export.
When encountering a path with private segments, mention if the item at
the final path segment is not publicly accessible at all.
Add item visibility metadata to privacy errors from imports:
On unreachable imports, record the item that was being imported in order
to suggest publicly available re-exports or to be explicit that the item
is not available publicly from any path.
In order to allow this, we add a mode to `resolve_path` that will not
add new privacy errors, nor return early if it encounters one. This way
we can get the `Res` corresponding to the final item in the import,
which is used in the privacy error machinery.
Add suggestion to remove `derive()` if invoked macro is non-derive
Adds to the existing `expected derive macro, found {}` error message:
```
help: remove the surrounding "derive()":
--> $DIR/macro-path-prelude-fail-4.rs:1:3
|
LL | #[derive(inline)]
| ^^^^^^^ ^
```
This suggestion will either fix the issue, in the case that the macro was valid, or provide a better error message if not
Not ready for merge yet, as the highlighted span is only valid for trivial formatting. Is there a nice way to get the parent span of the macro path within `smart_resolve_macro_path`?
Closes#109589
