promote debug_assert to assert when possible and useful
This PR fixed a very old issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94705 to clarify and improve the POSIX error checking, and some of the checks are skipped because can have no benefit, but I'm sure that this can open some interesting discussion.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94705
cc: `@tavianator`
cc: `@cuviper`
make raw_eq precondition more restrictive
Specifically, don't allow comparing pointers that way. Comparing pointers is subtle because you have to talk about what happens to the provenance.
This matches what [Miri already implements](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=9eb1dfb8a61b5a2d4a7cee43df2717af), and all existing users are fine with this.
If raw_eq on pointers is ever desired, we can adjust the intrinsic spec and Miri implementation as needed, but for now that seems just unnecessary. Also, this is a const intrinsic, and in const, comparing pointers this way is *not possible* -- so if we allow the intrinsic to compare pointers in general, we need to impose an extra restrictions saying that in const-context, pointers are *not* okay.
linux: Use `pthread_setname_np` instead of `prctl`
This function is available on Linux since glibc 2.12, musl 1.1.16, and
uClibc 1.0.20. The main advantage over `prctl` is that it properly
represents the pointer argument, rather than a multi-purpose `long`,
so we're better representing strict provenance (#95496).
Replace pointer casting in hashmap_random_keys with safe code
The old code was unnecessarily unsafe and relied on the layout of tuples always being the same as an array of the same size (which might be bad with `-Z randomize-layout`)?
The replacement has [identical codegen](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/qxsvdb8nx), so it seems like a reasonable change.
Reoptimize layout array
This way it's one check instead of two, so hopefully (cc #99117) it'll be simpler for rustc perf too 🤞
Quick demonstration:
```rust
pub fn demo(n: usize) -> Option<Layout> {
Layout::array::<i32>(n).ok()
}
```
Nightly: <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=e97bf33508aa03f38968101cdeb5322d>
```nasm
mov rax, rdi
mov ecx, 4
mul rcx
seto cl
movabs rdx, 9223372036854775805
xor esi, esi
cmp rax, rdx
setb sil
shl rsi, 2
xor edx, edx
test cl, cl
cmove rdx, rsi
ret
```
This PR (note no `mul`, in addition to being much shorter):
```nasm
xor edx, edx
lea rax, [4*rcx]
shr rcx, 61
sete dl
shl rdx, 2
ret
```
This is built atop `@CAD97` 's #99136; the new changes are cb8aba66ef6a0e17f08a0574e4820653e31b45a0.
I added a bunch more tests for `Layout::from_size_align` and `Layout::array` too.
Inline CStr::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked::rt_impl
Currently `CStr::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked::rt_impl` is not being inlined. The following function:
```rust
pub unsafe fn from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked(bytes: &[u8]) {
CStr::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked(bytes);
}
```
Outputs the following assembly on current nightly
```asm
example::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked:
jmp qword ptr [rip + _ZN4core3ffi5c_str4CStr29from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked7rt_impl17h026f29f3d6a41333E@GOTPCREL]
```
Meanwhile on beta this provides the following assembly:
```asm
example::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked:
ret
```
This pull request adds `#[inline]` annotation to`rt_impl` to fix a code generation regression for `CStr::from_bytes_with_nul_unchecked`.
docs: remove repetition in `is_numeric` function docs
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99628 we introduce new docs for the `is_numeric` function, and this is a follow-up PR that removes some unnecessary repetition that may be introduced by some rebasing.
`@rustbot` r? `@joshtriplett`
Stabilize backtrace
This PR stabilizes the std::backtrace module. As of #99431, the std::Error::backtrace item has been removed, and so the rest of the backtrace feature is set to be stabilized.
Previous discussion can be found in #72981, #3156.
Stabilized API summary:
```rust
pub mod std {
pub mod backtrace {
pub struct Backtrace { }
pub enum BacktraceStatus {
Unsupported,
Disabled,
Captured,
}
impl fmt::Debug for Backtrace {}
impl Backtrace {
pub fn capture() -> Backtrace;
pub fn force_capture() -> Backtrace;
pub const fn disabled() -> Backtrace;
pub fn status(&self) -> BacktraceStatus;
}
impl fmt::Display for Backtrace {}
}
}
```
`@yaahc`
This function is available on Linux since glibc 2.12, musl 1.1.16, and
uClibc 1.0.20. The main advantage over `prctl` is that it properly
represents the pointer argument, rather than a multi-purpose `long`,
so we're better representing strict provenance (#95496).
test: skip terminfo parsing in Miri
Terminfo parsing takes a significant amount of time in Miri, making libtest startup very slow. To work around that Miri in fact unsets the `TERM` variable. However, this means we don't get colors in `cargo miri test`.
So I propose we add some logic in libtest that skips parsing terminfo files under Miri, and just uses the regular basic coloring commands (taken from the `colored` crate).
As far as I can see, these two commands are all that libtest ever needs from terminfo, so Miri doesn't even lose any functionality through this. If you want I can entirely remove the terminfo parsing code and just use these commands instead.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2292 `@saethlin`
Remove Windows function preloading
After `@Mark-Simulacrum` asked me to provide guidance for when optionally imported functions should be preloaded, I realised my justifications were now quite weak. I think the strongest argument that can be made is that it avoids some degree of nondeterminism when calling these functions (in as far as system API calls can be said to be deterministic). However, I don't think that's particularly convincing unless there's a real world use case where it matters. Further discussion with `@thomcc` has strengthened my feeling that preloading isn't really needed.
Note that `WaitOnAddress` needed some adjustment to work without preloading. I opted not to use a macro for this special case as it seemed silly to do so for just one thing (and I don't like macros tbh).
