Introduce `TypeVisitor::BreakTy`
Implements MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#383.
r? `@ghost`
cc `@lcnr` `@oli-obk`
~~Blocked on FCP in rust-lang/compiler-team#383.~~
Add a case to `lint_search_is_some` to handle searching strings
Fixes: #6010
This adds a lint which recommends using `contains()` instead of `find()` followed by `is_some()` on strings as suggested in #6010.
This was added as an additional case to
5af88e3c2d/clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs (L3037)
I would really appreciate any comments/suggestions for my code!
changelog: Added case to `lint_search_is_some` to handle searching strings
Implement destructuring assignment for structs and slices
This is the second step towards implementing destructuring assignment (RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2909, tracking issue: #71126). This PR is the second part of #71156, which was split up to allow for easier review.
Note that the first PR (#78748) is not merged yet, so it is included as the first commit in this one. I thought this would allow the review to start earlier because I have some time this weekend to respond to reviews. If ``@petrochenkov`` prefers to wait until the first PR is merged, I totally understand, of course.
This PR implements destructuring assignment for (tuple) structs and slices. In order to do this, the following *parser change* was necessary: struct expressions are not required to have a base expression, i.e. `Struct { a: 1, .. }` becomes legal (in order to act like a struct pattern).
Unfortunately, this PR slightly regresses the diagnostics implemented in #77283. However, it is only a missing help message in `src/test/ui/issues/issue-77218.rs`. Other instances of this diagnostic are not affected. Since I don't exactly understand how this help message works and how to fix it yet, I was hoping it's OK to regress this temporarily and fix it in a follow-up PR.
Thanks to ``@varkor`` who helped with the implementation, particularly around the struct rest changes.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Do not collect tokens for doc comments
Doc comment is a single token and AST has all the information to re-create it precisely.
Doc comments are also responsible for majority of calls to `collect_tokens` (with `num_calls == 1` and `num_calls == 0`, cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78736).
(I also moved token collection into `fn parse_attribute` to deduplicate code a bit.)
r? `@Aaron1011`
instead of `find()` follows by `is_some()` on strings
Update clippy_lints/src/find_is_some_on_strs.rs
Co-authored-by: Takayuki Nakata <f.seasons017@gmail.com>
Update clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs
Co-authored-by: Philipp Krones <hello@philkrones.com>
Add `let_underscore_drop`
This line generalizes `let_underscore_lock` (#5101) to warn about any initializer expression that implements `Drop`.
So, for example, the following would generate a warning:
```rust
struct Droppable;
impl Drop for Droppable {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
let _ = Droppable;
```
I tried to preserve the original `let_underscore_lock` functionality in the sense that the warning generated for
```rust
let _ = mutex.lock();
```
should be unchanged.
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Add lint [`let_underscore_drop`]
rustc_ast: Do not panic by default when visiting macro calls
Panicking by default made sense when we didn't have HIR or MIR and everything worked on AST, but now all AST visitors run early and majority of them have to deal with macro calls, often by ignoring them.
The second commit renames `visit_mac` to `visit_mac_call`, the corresponding structures were renamed earlier in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69589.
Fix bad suggestions for `deref_addrof` and `try_err` lints
Fix bad suggestions when in macro expansion for `deref_addrof` and `try_err` lints.
Fixes: #6234Fixes: #6242Fixes: #6237
changelog: none
r? `@llogiq`
Fix example used in cargo_common_metadata
The previous example used in `cargo_common_metadata` included an authors field, even though the comment says it doesn't. And thus doesn't actually demonstrate an example of how the lint fails.
This removes that authors field from the _bad_ example and suggest to fix the _bad_ example by adding the authors field
changelog: Fix example used in `cargo_common_metadata`
We skip the lint if the `loop {}` is in the `#[panic_handler]` as the
main recommendation we give is to panic, which obviously isn't
possible in a panic handler.
Signed-off-by: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
Check when `from_utf8` is called from sliced byte array from string
---
*Please keep the line below*
changelog: Fix#5487: Add linter to check when `from_utf8` is called from sliced byte array from string.
"Respect" enums in `interior_mutable_const`
fixes#3962fixes#3825
Hello,
It might not be a good idea to submit another relatively large PR while I have an opened PR; but, I've finished this anyway. This may be able to wait for months.
Note: the code uses the MIR interpreter, which the author of #3962 thought unlikely to be a solution. This might be over-engineering; but, I think it's important to be able to work with the 'http' crate (#3825). (And, I don't want to write a MIR visitor)
---
changelog: fix a false positive in two `interior_mutable_const` lints where a constant with enums gets linted
even if it uses a clearly unfrozen variant
Provide diagnostic suggestion in ExprUseVisitor Delegate
The [Delegate trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38)) currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
r? `@ghost`
Add lint for 'field_reassign_with_default` #568
changelog: Add lint for field_reassign_with_default that checks if mutable object + field modification is used to edit a binding initialized with Default::default() instead of struct constructor.
Fixes#568
Notes:
- Checks for reassignment of one or more fields of a binding initialized with Default::default().
- Implemented using EarlyLintPass, might be future proofed better with LateLintPass.
- Does not trigger if Default::default() is used via another type implementing Default.
- This is a re-open of [PR#4761](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/4761), but I couldn't figure out how to re-open that one so here's a new one with the requested changes :S
Use const sym where possible
I ran a regex search and replace to use const `sym` values where possible. This should give some performance boost by avoiding string interning at runtime.
Con: It is not as consistent as always using `sym!`.
I also changed an internal lint to suggest using `sym::{}`, making an assumption that this will always work for diagnostic items.
changelog: none
Add lint 'ref_option_ref' #1377
This lint checks for usage of `&Option<&T>` which can be simplified as `Option<&T>` as suggested in #1377.
This WIP PR is here to get feedback on the lint as there's more cases to be handled:
* statics/consts,
* associated types,
* type alias,
* function/method parameter/return,
* ADT definitions (struct/tuple struct fields, enum variants)
changelog: Add 'ref_option_ref' lint
Add lint: from_iter_instead_of_collect
Fixes#5679
This implements lint for `::from_iter()` from #5679 not the general issue (`std::ops::Add::add`, etc.).
This lint checks if expression is function call with `from_iter` name and if it's implementation of the `std::iter::FromIterator` trait.
changelog: Introduce from_iter_instead_of_collect lint
single_char_insert_str: lint using insert_str() on single-char literals and suggest insert()
Fixes#6026
changelog: add single_char_insert_str lint which lints using string.insert_str() with single char literals and suggests string.insert() with a char
The [Delegate
trait](981346fc07/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L28-L38))
currently use `PlaceWithHirId` which is composed of Hir `Place` and the
corresponding expression id.
Even though this is an accurate way of expressing how a Place is used,
it can cause confusion during diagnostics.
Eg:
```
let arr : [String; 5];
let [a, ...] = arr;
^^^ E1 ^^^ = ^^E2^^
```
Here `arr` is moved because of the binding created E1. However, when we
point to E1 in diagnostics with the message `arr` was moved, it can be
confusing. Rather we would like to report E2 to the user.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/20
Implement rustc side of report-future-incompat
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71249
This is an alternative to `@pnkfelix's` initial implementation in https://github.com/pnkfelix/rust/commits/prototype-rustc-side-of-report-future-incompat (mainly because I started working before seeing that branch 😄 ).
My approach outputs the entire original `Diagnostic`, in a way that is compatible with incremental compilation. This is not yet integrated with compiletest, but can be used manually by passing `-Z emit-future-incompat-report` to `rustc`.
Several changes are made to support this feature:
* The `librustc_session/lint` module is moved to a new crate `librustc_lint_defs` (name bikesheddable). This allows accessing lint definitions from `librustc_errors`.
* The `Lint` struct is extended with an `Option<FutureBreakage>`. When present, it indicates that we should display a lint in the future-compat report. `FutureBreakage` contains additional information that we may want to display in the report (currently, a `date` field indicating when the crate will stop compiling).
* A new variant `rustc_error::Level::Allow` is added. This is used when constructing a diagnostic for a future-breakage lint that is marked as allowed (via `#[allow]` or `--cap-lints`). This allows us to capture any future-breakage diagnostics in one place, while still discarding them before they are passed to the `Emitter`.
* `DiagnosticId::Lint` is extended with a `has_future_breakage` field, indicating whether or not the `Lint` has future breakage information (and should therefore show up in the report).
* `Session` is given access to the `LintStore` via a new `SessionLintStore` trait (since `librustc_session` cannot directly reference `LintStore` without a cyclic dependency). We use this to turn a string `DiagnosticId::Lint` back into a `Lint`, to retrieve the `FutureBreakage` data.
Currently, `FutureBreakage.date` is always set to `None`. However, this could potentially be interpreted by Cargo in the future.
I've enabled the future-breakage report for the `ARRAY_INTO_ITER` lint, which can be used to test out this PR. The intent is to use the field to allow Cargo to determine the date of future breakage (as described in [RFC 2834](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2834-cargo-report-future-incompat.md)) without needing to parse the diagnostic itself.
cc `@pnkfelix`
- Implement `field_reassign_with_default` as a `LateLintPass`
- Avoid triggering `default_trait_access` on a span already linted by
`field_reassigned_with_default`
- Merge `default_trait_access` and `field_reassign_with_default` into
`Default`
- Co-authored-by: Eduardo Broto <ebroto@tutanota.com>
- Fixes#568
