We also have to remove the LLVM argument in cast-target-abi.rs for LLVM
21. I'm not really sure what the best approach here is since that test
already uses revisions. We could also fork the test into a copy for LLVM
19-20 and another for LLVM 21, but what I did for now was drop the
lint-abort-on-error flag to LLVM figuring that some coverage was better
than none, but I'm happy to change this if that was a bad direction.
The above also applies for ffi-out-of-bounds-loads.rs.
r? dianqk
@rustbot label llvm-main
Revert "Rollup merge of #136127 - WaffleLapkin:dyn_ptr_unwrap_cast, r=compiler-errors"
...not permanently tho. Just until we can land something like #138542, which will fix the underlying perf issues (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136127#issuecomment-2743891744). I just don't want this to land on beta and have people rely on this behavior if it'll need some reworking for it to be implemented performantly.
r? `@WaffleLapkin` or reassign -- sorry for reverting ur pr! i'm working on getting it re-landed soon :>
hygiene: Rewrite `apply_mark_internal` to be more understandable
The previous implementation allocated new `SyntaxContext`s in the inverted order, and it was generally very hard to understand why its result matches what the `opaque` and `opaque_and_semitransparent` field docs promise.
```rust
/// This context, but with all transparent and semi-transparent expansions filtered away.
opaque: SyntaxContext,
/// This context, but with all transparent expansions filtered away.
opaque_and_semitransparent: SyntaxContext,
```
It also couldn't be easily reused for the case where the context id is pre-reserved like in #129827.
The new implementation tries to follow the docs in a more straightforward way.
I did the transformation in small steps, so it indeed matches the old implementation, not just the docs.
So I suggest reading only the new version.
Improve hir_pretty for struct expressions.
While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139131 I noticed the hir pretty printer outputs an empty line between each field, and is also missing a space before the `{` and the `}`:
```rust
let a =
StructWithSomeFields{
field_1: 1,
field_2: 2,
field_3: 3,
field_4: 4,
field_5: 5,
field_6: 6,};
let a = StructWithSomeFields{ field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a};
```
This changes it to:
```rust
let a =
StructWithSomeFields {
field_1: 1,
field_2: 2,
field_3: 3,
field_4: 4,
field_5: 5,
field_6: 6 };
let a = StructWithSomeFields { field_1: 1, field_2: 2, ..a };
```
Remove attribute `#[rustc_error]`
It was an ancient way to write `check-pass` tests, but now it's no longer necessary (except for the `delayed_bug_from_inside_query` flavor, which is retained).
Simplify expansion for format_args!().
Instead of calling `Placeholder::new()`, we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
```rust
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
```
After:
```rust
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
```
(I originally avoided the struct expression, because `Placeholder` had a lot of fields. But now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136974 is merged, it only has four fields left.)
This will make the `fmt` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` a candidate for const promotion, which is important if we ever hope to tackle https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698 (It doesn't change anything yet though, because the `args` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` is not const-promotable.)
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
The main highlights this time are a Cranelift update, support for `#[target_feature]` for inline asm on arm64 and some vendor intrinsic fixes for arm64.
[AIX] Ignore linting on repr(C) structs with repr(packed) or repr(align(n))
This PR updates the lint added in 9b40bd7 to ignore repr(C) structs that also have repr(packed) or repr(align(n)).
As these representations can be modifiers on repr(C), it is assumed that users that add these should know what they are doing, and thus the the lint should not warn on the respective structs. For example, for the time being, using repr(packed) and manually padding a repr(C) struct can be done to correctly align struct members on AIX.
Instead of calling new(), we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
After:
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
Set `target_vendor = "openwrt"` on `mips64-openwrt-linux-musl`
OpenWRT is a Linux distribution for embedded network devices. The target name contains `openwrt`, so we should set `cfg(target_vendor = "openwrt")`.
This is similar to what other Linux distributions do (the only one in-tree is `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl`, but that sets `target_vendor = "unikraft"`).
Motivation: To make correctly [parsing target names](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/1413) simpler.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131165.
CC target maintainer `@Itus-Shield`
Fix `uclibc` LLVM target triples
`uclibc` is not an environment understood by LLVM, it is only a concept in Clang that can be selected with `-muclibc` (it affects which dynamic linker is passed to the static linker's `-dynamic-linker` flag).
In fact, using `uclibcgnueabi`/`uclibc` is actively harmful, as it prevents LLVM from seeing that the target is gnu-like; we should use `gnueabi`/`gnu` directly instead.
Motivation: To make it easier to verify that [`cc-rs`' conversion from `rustc` to Clang/LLVM triples](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1431) is correct.
**There are no target maintainers for these targets.** So I'll CC ``@lancethepants`` and ``@skrap`` who maintain the related `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi` and `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf` (both of which already pass `-gnu` instead of `-uclibc`) in case they have any insights.
r? jieyouxu
Remove `terminating_scopes` hash set.
Instead of inserting and checking ids in a hashset, we can just pass a boolean as argument.
For example:
```diff
- visitor.terminating_scopes.insert(arm.hir_id.local_id);
- visitor.enter_node_scope_with_dtor(arm.hir_id.local_id);
+ visitor.enter_node_scope_with_dtor(arm.hir_id.local_id, true);
```
Do not treat lifetimes from parent items as influencing child items
```rust
struct A;
impl Bar<'static> for A {
const STATIC: &str = "";
// ^ no future incompat warning
}
```
has no future incompat warning, because there is no ambiguity. But
```rust
struct C;
impl Bar<'_> for C {
// ^^ this lifeimte
const STATIC: &'static str = {
struct B;
impl Bar<'static> for B {
const STATIC: &str = "";
// causes ^ to emit a future incompat warning
}
""
};
}
```
had one before this PR, because the impl for `B` (which is just a copy of `A`) thought it was influenced by a lifetime on the impl for `C`.
I double checked all other `lifetime_ribs` iterations and all of them do check for `Item` boundaries. This feels very fragile tho, and ~~I think we should do not even be able to see ribs from parent items, but that's a different refactoring that I'd rather not do at the same time as a bugfix~~. EDIT: ah nevermind, this is needed for improving diagnostics like "use of undeclared lifetime" being "can't use generic parameters from outer item" instead.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Remove ScopeDepth
The scope depth was tracked, but never seemed to be used for anything.
Every single place that used `(Scope, ScopeDepth)`, matched it on `(p, _)`.
rustc_resolve: fix instability in lib.rmeta contents
rust-lang/rust@23032f31c9 accidentally introduced some nondeterminism in the ordering of lib.rmeta files, which we caught in our bazel-based builds only recently due to being further behind than normal. In my testing, this fixes the issue.
Avoid wrapping constant allocations in packed structs when not necessary
This way LLVM will set the string merging flag if the alloc is a nul terminated string, reducing binary sizes.
try-job: armhf-gnu
