Use object instead of LLVM for reading bitcode from rlibs
Together with changes I plan to make as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97485 this will allow entirely removing usage of LLVM's archive reader and thus allow removing `archive_ro.rs` and `ArchiveWrapper.cpp`.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`)
- #100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck)
- #101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`)
- #101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`)
- #101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information)
- #101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature)
- #101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook)
- #101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`)
- #101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck
This is certainly _one_ way to fix#100075. Not really confident it's the _best_ way to do it, though.
The root cause of this issue is that during MIR type-check, we end up trying to equate an opaque against the same opaque def-id but with different substs. Because of the way that we replace RPITs during (HIR) typeck with an inference variable, we don't end up emitting a type-checking error, so the delayed MIR bug causes an ICE.
See the `src/test/ui/impl-trait/issue-100075-2.rs` test below to make that clear -- in that example, we try to equate `{impl Sized} substs=[T]` and `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]`, which causes an ICE. This new logic will instead cause us to infer `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]` as the hidden type for `{impl Sized} substs=[T]`, which causes a proper error to be emitted later on when we check that an opaque isn't recursive.
I'm open to closing this in favor of something else. Ideally we'd fix this in typeck, but the thing we do to ensure backwards compatibility with weird RPIT cases makes that difficult. Also open to discussing this further.
Revert let_chains stabilization
This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
Bumps the stage0 compiler which already has it reverted.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100898 (Do not report too many expr field candidates)
- #101056 (Add the syntax of references to their documentation summary.)
- #101106 (Rustdoc-Json: Retain Stripped Modules when they are imported, not when they have items)
- #101131 (CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible)
- #101141 (Simplify `get_trait_ref` fn used for `virtual_function_elimination`)
- #101146 (Various changes to logging of borrowck-related code)
- #101156 (Remove `Sync` requirement from lint pass objects)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove `Sync` requirement from lint pass objects
This is blocking the clippy sync (#101140). One of the lint passes contains a `Cell` in order to make lifetimes work. It could be worked around, but this is the easier change to make if there are no objections.
Rational for removing the requirement
* All lint pass methods take `&mut self` arguments.
* Many passes depend on running is visitor order.
* Lint passes are created on demand so they're only ever stored in a local.
* `Send` is enough to lint different passes in parallel.
`LintStore` remains `Sync` with this. The constructor functions it contains still maintain their `Sync` requirement.
r? rust-lang/compiler
Simplify `get_trait_ref` fn used for `virtual_function_elimination`
1. The name `get_trait_ref` is misleading, so I renamed it to something more like `expect_...` because it ICEs if used incorrectly.
2. No need to manually go through the existential trait refs, we already have `.principal()` for that.
CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible
The remaining "needs RFC" errors are just needlessly confusing, I think -- time to get rid of that error variant. They are anyway only reachable with miri-unleashed (if at all).
r? `@oli-obk`
Do not report too many expr field candidates
When considering "this expressions' field has a {field/method}" suggestions:
1. Don't report methods that are out of scope
2. Use `span_suggestions` instead of reporting each field candidate, which caps the number of suggestions to 4
4. Blacklist some common traits like `Clone` and `Deref`
Fixes#100894
Separate CountIsStar from CountIsParam in rustc_parse_format.
`rustc_parse_format`'s parser would result in the exact same output for `{:.*}` and `{:.0$}`, making it hard for diagnostics to handle these cases properly.
This splits those cases by adding a new `CountIsStar` enum variant.
This fixes#100995
Prerequisite for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100996
Make use of `[wrapping_]byte_{add,sub}`
These new methods trivially replace old `.cast().wrapping_offset().cast()` & similar code.
Note that [`arith_offset`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/intrinsics/fn.arith_offset.html) and `wrapping_offset` are the same thing.
r? ``@scottmcm``
_split off from #100746_
remove an ineffective check in const_prop
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100043, only the last two commits are new.
ConstProp has a special check when reading from a local that prevents reading uninit locals. However, if that local flows into `force_allocation`, then no check fires and evaluation proceeds. So this check is not really effective at preventing accesses to uninit locals.
With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100043, `read_immediate` and friends always fail when reading uninit locals, so I don't see why ConstProp would need a separate check. Thus I propose we remove it. This is needed to be able to do https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100085.
Remove separate indexing of early-bound regions
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99728.~
This PR copies some modifications from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97839 around object lifetime defaults.
These modifications allow to stop counting generic parameters during lifetime resolution, and rely on the indexing given by `rustc_typeck::collect`.
Use the declaration's SourceInfo for FnEntry retags, not the outermost
This addresses a long-standing `// FIXME` in the pass that adds retags.
The changes to Miri's UI tests will look like this:
```
--> $DIR/aliasing_mut1.rs:LL:CC
|
LL | pub fn safe(_x: &mut i32, _y: &mut i32) {}
< | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not granting access to tag <TAG> because incompatible item [Unique for <TAG>] is protected by call ID
> | ^^ not granting access to tag <TAG> because incompatible item [Unique for <TAG>] is protected by call ID
|
```
r? ````@RalfJung````
translations: rename warn_ to warning
## Description
This MR renames the the macro `warn_` to `warning`.
To give a little bit of context, as [explained](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20diag.20translation/near/295074146) by ```````@davidtwco``````` in the Zulip channel, `warn_` was named like that because the keyword `warn` is a built-in attribute and at the time this macro was created the word `warning` was also
taken.
However, it is no longer the case and we can rename `warn_` to `warning`.
extra sanity check against consts pointing to mutable memory
This should be both unreachable and redundant (since we already ensure that validation only reads from read-only memory, when validating consts), but I feel like we cannot be paranoid enough here, and also if this ever fails it'll be a nicer error than the "cannot read from mutable memory" error.
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access
Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks
independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field
directly.
Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access,
which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
rustc_middle: Remove `Visibility::Invisible`
It had a different meaning in the past, but now it's only used as an implementation detail of import resolution.
