const_generics: Dont evaluate array length const when handling errors
Fixes#79518Fixes#78246
cc ````@lcnr````
This was ICE'ing because we dont pass in the correct ``ParamEnv`` which meant that there was no ``Self: Foo`` predicate to make ``Self::Assoc`` well formed which caused an ICE when trying to normalize ``Self::Assoc`` in the mir interpreter
r? ````@varkor````
Add match pattern diagnostics regression test
Closes#72377 by adding a regression test.
This test case fails on stable but now works on beta and nightly. It *should* have worked already for years, the crucial point whether it is mentioned that some uncovered patterns are not explicitly mentioned.
Suggest to create a new `const` item if the `fn` in the array is a `const fn`
Fixes#73734. If the `fn` in the array repeat expression is a `const fn`, suggest creating a new `const` item. On nightly, suggest creating an inline `const` block. This PR also removes the `suggest_const_in_array_repeat_expressions` as it is no longer necessary.
Example:
```rust
fn main() {
// Should not compile but hint to create a new const item (stable) or an inline const block (nightly)
let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
println!("{:?}", strings);
}
```
Gives this error:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `std::string::String: std::marker::Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
2 | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `std::marker::Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= note: the `Copy` trait is required because the repeated element will be copied
```
With this change, this is the error message:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
LL | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= help: moving the function call to a new `const` item will resolve the error
```
The use of module-level functions instead of associated functions
on `<*const T>` or `<*mut T>` follows the precedent of
`ptr::slice_from_raw_parts` and `ptr::slice_from_raw_parts_mut`.
Check the result cache before the DepGraph when ensuring queries
Split out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70951
Calling `ensure` on already forced queries is a common operation.
Looking at the results cache first is faster than checking the DepGraph for a green node.
On 32-bit ARM platforms, the register `r14` has the alias `lr`. When used as an output register in `asm!`, rustc canonicalizes the name to `r14`. LLVM only knows the register by the name `lr`, and rejects it. This changes rustc's LLVM code generation to output `lr` instead.
The `rustc_data_structures::sync::OnceCell` is thread-safe when building
a parallel compiler. This is unnecessary for the purposes of pattern
usefulness checking. Use `!Sync` `std::lazy::OnceCell` instead.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #80523 (#[doc(inline)] sym_generated)
- #80920 (Visit more targets when validating attributes)
- #81720 (Updated smallvec version due to RUSTSEC-2021-0003)
- #81891 ([rustdoc-json] Make `header` a vec of modifiers, and FunctionPointer consistent)
- #81912 (Implement the precise analysis pass for lint `disjoint_capture_drop_reorder`)
- #81914 (Fixing bad suggestion for `_` in `const` type when a function #81885)
- #81919 (BTreeMap: fix internal comments)
- #81927 (Add a regression test for #32498)
- #81965 (Fix MIR pretty printer for non-local DefIds)
- #82029 (Use debug log level for developer oriented logs)
- #82056 (fix ice (#82032))
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
In the backend we may want to remove certain temporary files, but in
certain other situations these files might not be produced in the first
place. We don't exactly care about that, and the intent is really that
these files are gone after a certain point in the backend.
Here we unify the backend file removing calls to use `ensure_removed`
which will attempt to delete a file, but will not fail if it does not
exist (anymore).
The tradeoff to this approach is, of course, that we may miss instances
were we are attempting to remove files at wrong paths due to some bug –
compilation would silently succeed but the temporary files would remain
there somewhere.
