feat(rustc_lint): add `dyn_drop`
Based on the conversation in #86747.
Explanation
-----------
A trait object bound of the form `dyn Drop` is most likely misleading and not what the programmer intended.
`Drop` bounds do not actually indicate whether a type can be trivially dropped or not, because a composite type containing `Drop` types does not necessarily implement `Drop` itself. Naïvely, one might be tempted to write a deferred drop system, to pull cleaning up memory out of a latency-sensitive code path, using `dyn Drop` trait objects. However, this breaks down e.g. when `T` is `String`, which does not implement `Drop`, but should probably be accepted.
To write a trait object bound that accepts anything, use a placeholder trait with a blanket implementation.
```rust
trait Placeholder {}
impl<T> Placeholder for T {}
fn foo(_x: Box<dyn Placeholder>) {}
```
Don't use gc-sections with profile-generate.
When building with profile-generate don't call gc_sections as this can
can sometimes strip out profile data. This missing information in the
prof files can then result in missing functions when using the profile
information.
#78226
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use existing declaration of rust_eh_personality
If crate declares `rust_eh_personality`, re-use existing declaration
as otherwise attempts to set function attributes that follow the
declaration will fail (unless it happens to have exactly the same
type signature as the one predefined in the compiler).
Fixes#70117.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81469#issuecomment-809428126; probably.
These are all testing corner-cases in the compiler.
Adding a new warning broke these test cases, but --cap-lints stops
it from actually breaking things in production.
Based on the conversation in #86747.
Explanation
-----------
A trait object bound of the form `dyn Drop` is most likely misleading
and not what the programmer intended.
`Drop` bounds do not actually indicate whether a type can be trivially
dropped or not, because a composite type containing `Drop` types does
not necessarily implement `Drop` itself. Naïvely, one might be tempted
to write a deferred drop system, to pull cleaning up memory out of a
latency-sensitive code path, using `dyn Drop` trait objects. However,
this breaks down e.g. when `T` is `String`, which does not implement
`Drop`, but should probably be accepted.
To write a trait object bound that accepts anything, use a placeholder
trait with a blanket implementation.
```rust
trait Placeholder {}
impl<T> Placeholder for T {}
fn foo(_x: Box<dyn Placeholder>) {}
```
Add diagnostics for mistyped inclusive range
Inclusive ranges are correctly typed as `..=`. However, it's quite easy to think of it as being like `==`, and type `..==` instead. This PR adds helpful diagnostics for this case.
Resolves#86395 (there are some other cases there, but I think those should probably have separate issues).
r? `@estebank`
Add diagnostic items for Clippy
This adds a bunch of diagnostic items to `std`/`core`/`alloc` functions, structs and traits used in Clippy. The actual refactorings in Clippy to use these items will be done in a different PR in Clippy after the next sync.
This PR doesn't include all paths Clippy uses, I've only gone through the first 85 lines of Clippy's [`paths.rs`](ecf85f4bdc/clippy_utils/src/paths.rs) (after rust-lang/rust-clippy#7466) to get some feedback early on. I've also decided against adding diagnostic items to methods, as it would be nicer and more scalable to access them in a nicer fashion, like adding a `is_diagnostic_assoc_item(did, sym::Iterator, sym::map)` function or something similar (Suggested by `@camsteffen` [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/147480-t-compiler.2Fwg-diagnostics/topic/Diagnostic.20Item.20Naming.20Convention.3F/near/225024603))
There seems to be some different naming conventions when it comes to diagnostic items, some use UpperCamelCase (`BinaryHeap`) and some snake_case (`hashmap_type`). This PR uses UpperCamelCase for structs and traits and snake_case with the module name as a prefix for functions. Any feedback on is this welcome.
cc: rust-lang/rust-clippy#5393
r? `@Manishearth`
Remove nondeterminism in multiple-definitions test
Compare all fields in `DllImport` when sorting to avoid nondeterminism in the error for multiple inconsistent definitions of an extern function. Restore the multiple-definitions test.
Resolves#87084.
Check that const parameters of trait methods have compatible types
This PR fixes#86820. The problem is that this currently passes the type checker:
```rust
trait Tr {
fn foo<const N: u8>(self) -> u8;
}
impl Tr for f32 {
fn foo<const N: bool>(self) -> u8 { 42 }
}
```
i.e. the type checker fails to check whether const parameters in `impl` methods have the same type as the corresponding declaration in the trait. With my changes, I get, for the above code:
```
error[E0053]: method `foo` has an incompatible const parameter type for trait
--> test.rs:6:18
|
6 | fn foo<const N: bool>(self) -> u8 { 42 }
| ^
|
note: the const parameter `N` has type `bool`, but the declaration in trait `Tr::foo` has type `u8`
--> test.rs:2:18
|
2 | fn foo<const N: u8>(self) -> u8;
| ^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
This fixes#86820, where an ICE happens later on because the trait method is declared with a const parameter of type `u8`, but the `impl` uses one of type `usize`:
> `expected int of size 8, but got size 1`
