Commit Graph

277 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
KaDiWa
9bc69925cb
compiler: remove unnecessary imports and qualified paths 2022-12-10 18:45:34 +01:00
Peter Collingbourne
f44a0153bc Support Option and similar enums as type of static variable with linkage attribute.
Compiler MCP:
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/565
2022-12-05 15:05:43 -08:00
bors
7fe6f36224 Auto merge of #103491 - cjgillot:self-rpit, r=oli-obk
Support using `Self` or projections inside an RPIT/async fn

I reuse the same idea as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103449 to use variances to encode whether a lifetime parameter is captured by impl-trait.

The current implementation of async and RPIT replace all lifetimes from the parent generics by `'static`.  This PR changes the scheme
```rust
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
    fn foo<'b, T>() -> impl Into<Self> + 'b { ... }
}

opaque Foo::<'_a>::foo::<'_b, T>::opaque<'b>: Into<Foo<'_a>> + 'b;
impl<'a> Foo<'a> {
    // OLD
    fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'static>::foo::<'static, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
                             ^^^^^^^ the `Self` becomes `Foo<'static>`

    // NEW
    fn foo<'b, T>() -> Foo::<'a>::foo::<'b, T>::opaque::<'b> { ... }
                             ^^ the `Self` stays `Foo<'a>`
}
```

There is the same issue with projections. In the example, substitute `Self` by `<T as Trait<'b>>::Assoc` in the sugared version, and `Foo<'_a>` by `<T as Trait<'_b>>::Assoc` in the desugared one.

This allows to support `Self` in impl-trait, since we do not replace lifetimes by `'static` any more.  The same trick allows to use projections like `T::Assoc` where `Self` is allowed.  The feature is gated behind a `impl_trait_projections` feature gate.

The implementation relies on 2 tweaking rules for opaques in 2 places:
- we only relate substs that correspond to captured lifetimes during TypeRelation;
- we only list captured lifetimes in choice region computation.

For simplicity, I encoded the "capturedness" of lifetimes as a variance, `Bivariant` vs `Invariant` for unused vs captured lifetimes. The `variances_of` query used to ICE for opaques.

Impl-trait that do not reference `Self` or projections will have their variances as:
- `o` (invariant) for each parent type or const;
- `*` (bivariant) for each parent lifetime --> will not participate in borrowck;
- `o` (invariant) for each own lifetime.

Impl-trait that does reference `Self` and/or projections will have some parent lifetimes marked as `o` (as the example above), and participate in type relation and borrowck.  In the example above, `variances_of(opaque) = ['_a: o, '_b: *, T: o, 'b: o]`.

r? types
cc `@compiler-errors` , as you asked about the issue with `Self` and projections.
2022-11-21 12:17:03 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
55ff8bf847
Rollup merge of #104339 - compiler-errors:rustc_deny_explicit_impl, r=cjgillot
Add `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`

Also adjust `E0322` error message to be more general, since it's used for `DiscriminantKind` and `Pointee` as well.

Also add `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` on the `Tuple` and `Destruct` marker traits.
2022-11-15 10:44:12 +01:00
Michael Goulet
b5b6467810 Add rustc_deny_explicit_impl 2022-11-14 03:23:41 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
da9dca7040 Retire error code. 2022-11-12 10:03:13 +00:00
Dylan DPC
6e819af3a7
Rollup merge of #103924 - PeteDevoy:patch-1, r=estebank
Fix broken link in description of error code E0706

Corresponding subsection in async book is `07.05` not `07.06`.

The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
2022-11-11 20:51:39 +05:30
Dylan DPC
408b8cf7c4
Rollup merge of #103757 - ffmancera:ff/clarify_E0207, r=jackh726
Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207

Error Index for E0207 must mention const and lifetime parameters. In addition, add code examples for these situations.

Fixes #80862
2022-11-07 18:35:23 +05:30
Pete
4b5cff5b55
Fix broken link in error code E0706 docs
Corresponding subsection in async book is not `07.05` not `07.06`.

The information on the linked page is the same so it may be reasonable to remove the whole sentence.
2022-11-03 14:15:32 +01:00
Dominic Farolino
b978bba6a9
Update E0382.md 2022-10-31 00:41:12 -04:00
Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2159df22a2 Mention const and lifetime parameters in error E0207
Error Index for E0207 must mention const and lifetime parameters. In
addition, add code examples for these situations.

Fixes #80862
2022-10-30 12:01:39 +01:00
Dylan DPC
5b6455318a
Rollup merge of #95710 - fee1-dead-contrib:stabilize_arbitrary_enum_discriminant, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize arbitrary_enum_discriminant, take 2

Documentation has been updated in https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1055. cc #86860 for previous stabilization report.

Not yet marks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553 as done: need documentation in the rust reference.
2022-10-26 17:32:53 +05:30
Jesse Ruderman
e3a091ad6a
Remove redundant sentence 2022-10-24 00:52:26 -07:00
Deadbeef
988e75bb65 Stabilize arbitrary_enum_discriminant, take 2 2022-10-22 13:54:39 +08:00
Rageking8
d1982bd0af fix small word dupe typos 2022-10-13 00:53:46 +08:00
nils
1df0a1890a Cleanup some error code explanations
E0045: Use a stable non-C ABI instead
E0092: Use an atomic intrinsic that actually exists
E0161: Don't use box_syntax
E0579: Format ranges in the rustfmt style
E0622: Use the rustfmt style
E0743: Remove feature gate as it's not needed
2022-10-03 08:53:06 +02:00
bors
ce7f0f1aa0 Auto merge of #100719 - CohenArthur:rust-safe-intrinsic-attribute, r=wesleywiser
Add `#[rustc_safe_intrinsic]`

This PR adds the `#[rustc_safe_intrinsic]` attribute as mentionned on Zulip. The goal of this attribute is to avoid keeping a list of symbols as the source for stable intrinsics, and instead rely on an attribute. This is similar to `#[rustc_const_stable]` and `#[rustc_const_unstable]`, which among other things, are used to mark the constness of intrinsic functions.
2022-09-28 19:07:50 +00:00
Matthew Kelly
c0d32fd2cc review updates 2022-09-27 19:23:59 -04:00
Arthur Cohen
99d57ee23d core: Mark all safe intrinsics with #[rustc_safe_intrinsic] 2022-09-27 15:55:42 +02:00
Matthew Kelly
0d9c01480b remove implied link bound per review
also update .stderr outputs
2022-09-26 20:50:33 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
eda2a40145 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into mpk/add-long-error-message-for-E0311 2022-08-31 19:39:39 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
4a443dfb82 review updates to E0311 description 2022-08-29 06:05:01 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
deadf071ed fix trailing ] 2022-08-27 14:36:17 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
de3e95b56c Review updates: simpler MWE and docs
- use the simpler minimum working example from the review
- add an alterate "fix" that helps make the cause of the error more
  clear
- attempt to add an improved description of what is going on
2022-08-27 14:20:59 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
4f194a76c8 Fix rust-doc error
There was a partial rust code block in the readme that was invalid
because of a missing line. I inlined the code snippet into the text to
fix the error. This also improves readability a bit.
2022-08-25 05:46:47 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
fc02eee8f6 fix wrapping 2022-08-24 20:51:48 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
dd7c48e529 Improve description again
-- update summary based on review
-- rewrite explanation to be more clear and correct
2022-08-24 20:44:09 -04:00
Joshua Nelson
31e39446ec Stabilize #![feature(label_break_value)]
# Stabilization proposal

The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.

There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630

Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006

Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249

nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.

joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804

withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.

joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353

[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+

 ## Report

+ Feature gate:
    - d695a497bb/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
    - 6b2d3d5f3c/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs (L2629)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L749)
    - f65bf0b2bb/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs (L1001)
    - 111df9e6ed/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs (L254)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L2079)
    - d695a497bb/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs (L1569)
+ Tests:
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
    - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs

 ## Interactions with other features

Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.

label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
    'foo: {
        Err(())?;
        break 'foo;
    }
};
```

label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
    || break 'a
    //~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
    //~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```

label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
    match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
        _ => {}
    }
}

macro_rules! m {
    ($b:block) => {
        'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
        |x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
    }
}

fn foo() {
    m!({});
}
```

[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
2022-08-23 21:14:12 -05:00
Matthew Kelly
231e3a0415 actually fix typo this time 2022-08-23 05:26:47 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
dbcc409556 Improve E0311.md description 2022-08-23 05:19:04 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
a9cefd0441 fix line lengths 2022-08-19 10:53:14 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
63de1ec070
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
2022-08-19 09:34:20 -04:00
Matthew Kelly
fa91980d2d Add long description and test for E0311
Adds a long description and unit test for the E0311 compiler error.
2022-08-19 06:46:37 -04:00
5225225
09ea9f0a87 Add diagnostic translation lints to crates that don't emit them 2022-08-18 19:29:02 +01:00
lcnr
43ccacf89b region_outlives_predicate no snapshot 2022-07-21 13:09:01 +02:00
bors
9a7b7d5e50 Auto merge of #98180 - notriddle:notriddle/rustdoc-fn, r=petrochenkov,GuillaumeGomez
Improve the function pointer docs

This is #97842 but for function pointers instead of tuples. The concept is basically the same.

* Reduce duplicate impls; show `fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ)` and include a sentence saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.

https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/std/primitive.fn.html
2022-07-19 19:36:57 +00:00
Michael Howell
5271e32c46 Improve the function pointer docs
* Reduce duplicate impls; show only the `fn (T)` and include a sentence
  saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
2022-07-19 08:52:24 -07:00
aticu
38ea23558e Don't use main; improve example 2022-07-19 10:23:34 +02:00
aticu
1cbacc0c8a Add E0790 as more specific variant of E0283 2022-07-19 10:16:10 +02:00
Jane Losare-Lusby
e4e6b1ebc6 fixes post rebase 2022-07-08 21:18:16 +00:00
Jane Lusby
b55453dbad add opt in attribute for stable-in-unstable items 2022-07-08 21:18:15 +00:00
Dylan DPC
45740acd34
Rollup merge of #97423 - m-ou-se:memory-ordering-intrinsics, r=tmiasko
Simplify memory ordering intrinsics

This changes the names of the atomic intrinsics to always fully include their memory ordering arguments.

```diff
- atomic_cxchg
+ atomic_cxchg_seqcst_seqcst

- atomic_cxchg_acqrel
+ atomic_cxchg_acqrel_release

- atomic_cxchg_acqrel_failrelaxed
+ atomic_cxchg_acqrel_relaxed

// And so on.
```

- `seqcst` is no longer implied
- The failure ordering on chxchg is no longer implied in some cases, but now always explicitly part of the name.
- `release` is no longer shortened to just `rel`. That was especially confusing, since `relaxed` also starts with `rel`.
- `acquire` is no longer shortened to just `acq`, such that the names now all match the `std::sync::atomic::Ordering` variants exactly.
- This now allows for more combinations on the compare exchange operations, such as `atomic_cxchg_acquire_release`, which is necessary for #68464.
- This PR only exposes the new possibilities through unstable intrinsics, but not yet through the stable API. That's for [a separate PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98383) that requires an FCP.

Suffixes for operations with a single memory order:

| Order   | Before       | After      |
|---------|--------------|------------|
| Relaxed | `_relaxed`   | `_relaxed` |
| Acquire | `_acq`       | `_acquire` |
| Release | `_rel`       | `_release` |
| AcqRel  | `_acqrel`    | `_acqrel`  |
| SeqCst  | (none)       | `_seqcst`  |

Suffixes for compare-and-exchange operations with two memory orderings:

| Success | Failure | Before                   | After              |
|---------|---------|--------------------------|--------------------|
| Relaxed | Relaxed | `_relaxed`               | `_relaxed_relaxed` |
| Relaxed | Acquire |                       | `_relaxed_acquire` |
| Relaxed | SeqCst  |                       | `_relaxed_seqcst`  |
| Acquire | Relaxed | `_acq_failrelaxed`       | `_acquire_relaxed` |
| Acquire | Acquire | `_acq`                   | `_acquire_acquire` |
| Acquire | SeqCst  |                       | `_acquire_seqcst`  |
| Release | Relaxed | `_rel`                   | `_release_relaxed` |
| Release | Acquire |                       | `_release_acquire` |
| Release | SeqCst  |                       | `_release_seqcst`  |
| AcqRel  | Relaxed | `_acqrel_failrelaxed`    | `_acqrel_relaxed`  |
| AcqRel  | Acquire | `_acqrel`                | `_acqrel_acquire`  |
| AcqRel  | SeqCst  |                       | `_acqrel_seqcst`   |
| SeqCst  | Relaxed | `_failrelaxed`           | `_seqcst_relaxed`  |
| SeqCst  | Acquire | `_failacq`               | `_seqcst_acquire`  |
| SeqCst  | SeqCst  | (none)                   | `_seqcst_seqcst`   |
2022-06-29 10:28:18 +05:30
Mara Bos
4982a59986 Rename/restructure memory ordering intrinsics. 2022-06-28 08:58:27 +02:00
onlinesoftwaredevok
99672fb2dc Add comment for internal error codes 2022-06-12 19:52:49 -03:00
Dylan DPC
f1f44b9e4d
Rollup merge of #96868 - nrc:turbo-stable, r=jhpratt,nbdd0121,nagisa
Stabilize explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait

This is a stabilisation PR for `explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait`.

* [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83701)
  - [Stabilisation report](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83701#issuecomment-1109949897)
  - [FCP entered](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83701#issuecomment-1120285703)
* [implementation PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86176)
* [Reference PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1212)
* There is no mention of using the turbofish operator in the book (other than an entry in the operator list in the appendix), so there is no documentation to change/add there, unless we felt like we should add a section on using turbofish, but that seems orthogonal to `explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait`
2022-06-11 07:42:12 +02:00
CorinJG
6227d89d6a E0577 fixed Sea struct CamelCase/sea module snake_case 2022-06-10 14:21:40 +01:00
CorinJG
20e166eab4 Fixed several error_codes/Exxxx.md messages which used UpperCamelCase instead of snake_case for module names 2022-06-10 11:25:47 +01:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
a8ee1f3a4f Stabilize the bundle native library modifier 2022-06-09 23:12:58 +04:00
bors
bb55bd449e Auto merge of #95565 - jackh726:remove-borrowck-mode, r=nikomatsakis
Remove migrate borrowck mode

Closes #58781
Closes #43234

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(nll)]` and the removal of `-Z borrowck`. Current borrow checking behavior of item bodies is currently done by first infering regions *lexically* and reporting any errors during HIR type checking. If there *are* any errors, then MIR borrowck (NLL) never occurs. If there *aren't* any errors, then MIR borrowck happens and any errors there would be reported. This PR removes the lexical region check of item bodies entirely and only uses MIR borrowck. Because MIR borrowck could never *not* be run for a compiled program, this should not break any programs. It does, however, change diagnostics significantly and allows a slightly larger set of programs to compile.

Tracking issue: #43234
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2094-nll.md
Version: 1.63 (2022-06-30 => beta, 2022-08-11 => stable).

## Motivation

Over time, the Rust borrow checker has become "smarter" and thus allowed more programs to compile. There have been three different implementations: AST borrowck, MIR borrowck, and polonius (well, in progress). Additionally, there is the "lexical region resolver", which (roughly) solves the constraints generated through HIR typeck. It is not a full borrow checker, but does emit some errors.

The AST borrowck was the original implementation of the borrow checker and was part of the initially stabilized Rust 1.0. In mid 2017, work began to implement the current MIR borrow checker and that effort ompleted by the end of 2017, for the most part. During 2018, efforts were made to migrate away from the AST borrow checker to the MIR borrow checker - eventually culminating into "migrate" mode - where HIR typeck with lexical region resolving following by MIR borrow checking - being active by default in the 2018 edition.

In early 2019, migrate mode was turned on by default in the 2015 edition as well, but with MIR borrowck errors emitted as warnings. By late 2019, these warnings were upgraded to full errors. This was followed by the complete removal of the AST borrow checker.

In the period since, various errors emitted by the MIR borrow checker have been improved to the point that they are mostly the same or better than those emitted by the lexical region resolver.

While there do remain some degradations in errors (tracked under the [NLL-diagnostics tag](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-diagnostics), those are sufficiently small and rare enough that increased flexibility of MIR borrow check-only is now a worthwhile tradeoff.

## What is stabilized

As said previously, this does not fundamentally change the landscape of accepted programs. However, there are a [few](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3ANLL-fixed-by-NLL) cases where programs can compile under `feature(nll)`, but not otherwise.

There are two notable patterns that are "fixed" by this stabilization. First, the `scoped_threads` feature, which is a continutation of a pre-1.0 API, can sometimes emit a [weird lifetime error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95527) without NLL. Second, actually seen in the standard library. In the `Extend` impl for `HashMap`, there is an implied bound of `K: 'a` that is available with NLL on but not without - this is utilized in the impl.

As mentioned before, there are a large number of diagnostic differences. Most of them are better, but some are worse. None are serious or happen often enough to need to block this PR. The biggest change is the loss of error code for a number of lifetime errors in favor of more general "lifetime may not live long enough" error. While this may *seem* bad, the former error codes were just attempts to somewhat-arbitrarily bin together lifetime errors of the same type; however, on paper, they end up being roughly the same with roughly the same kinds of solutions.

## What isn't stabilized

This PR does not completely remove the lexical region resolver. In the future, it may be possible to remove that (while still keeping HIR typeck) or to remove it together with HIR typeck.

## Tests

Many test outputs get updated by this PR. However, there are number of tests specifically geared towards NLL under `src/test/ui/nll`

## History

* On 2017-07-14, [tracking issue opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43234)
* On 2017-07-20, [initial empty MIR pass added](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43271)
* On 2017-08-29, [RFC opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2094)
* On 2017-11-16, [Integrate MIR type-checker with NLL](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45825)
* On 2017-12-20, [NLL feature complete](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46862)
* On 2018-07-07, [Don't run AST borrowck on mir mode](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52083)
* On 2018-07-27, [Add migrate mode](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52681)
* On 2019-04-22, [Enable migrate mode on 2015 edition](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59114)
* On 2019-08-26, [Don't downgrade errors on 2015 edition](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64221)
* On 2019-08-27, [Remove AST borrowck](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64790)
2022-06-07 05:04:14 +00:00
Dylan DPC
99afe26032
Rollup merge of #97787 - matthiaskrgr:e0432_explain, r=Dylan-DPC
E0432: rust 2018 -> rust 2018 or later    in --explain message
2022-06-06 14:34:59 +02:00