Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked
in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679
and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end
up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19
would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv`
ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two
things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by
default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite
both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An
explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue`
feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead
of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both
`-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal
C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
Most modules have such a blank line, but some don't. Inserting the blank
line makes it clearer that the `//!` comments are describing the entire
module, rather than the `use` declaration(s) that immediately follows.
smir: merge identical Constant and ConstOperand types
The first commit renames the const operand visitor functions on regular MIR to match the type name, that was forgotten in the original rename.
The second commit changes stable MIR, fixing https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/71. Previously there were two different smir types for the MIR type `ConstOperand`, one used in `Operand` and one in `VarDebugInfoContents`.
Maybe we should have done this with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125967, so there's only a single breaking change... but I saw that PR too late.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/71
Unify intrinsics body handling in StableMIR
rust-lang/rust#120675 introduced a new mechanism to declare intrinsics which will potentially replace the rust-intrinsic ABI.
The new mechanism introduces a placeholder body and mark the intrinsic with `#[rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden]`.
In practice, this means that a backend should not generate code for the placeholder, and shim the intrinsic.
The new annotation is an internal compiler implementation, and it doesn't need to be exposed to StableMIR users.
In this PR, we unify the interface for intrinsics marked with `rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden` and intrinsics that do not have a body.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/79
r? ``@oli-obk``
cc: ``@momvart``
Add a new trait to retrieve StableMir definition Ty
We implement the trait only for definitions that should have a type. It's possible that I missed a few definitions, but we can add them later if needed.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-stable-mir/issues/80
We implement the trait only for definitions that should have a type.
It's possible that I missed a few definitions, but we can add them later
if needed.
rust-lang/rust#120675 introduced a new mechanism to declare intrinsics
which will potentially replace the rust-intrinsic ABI.
The new mechanism introduces a placeholder body and mark the intrinsic
with #[rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden].
In practice, this means that backends should not generate code for the
placeholder, and shim the intrinsic.
The new annotation is an internal compiler implementation,
and it doesn't need to be exposed to StableMIR users.
In this PR, intrinsics marked with `rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden`
are handled the same way as intrinsics that do not have a body.
deref patterns: lower deref patterns to MIR
This lowers deref patterns to MIR. This is a bit tricky because this is the first kind of pattern that requires storing a value in a temporary. Thanks to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123324 false edges are no longer a problem.
The thing I'm not confident about is the handling of fake borrows. This PR ignores any fake borrows inside a deref pattern. We are guaranteed to at least fake borrow the place of the first pointer value, which could be enough, but I'm not certain.
Add simple async drop glue generation
This is a prototype of the async drop glue generation for some simple types. Async drop glue is intended to behave very similar to the regular drop glue except for being asynchronous. Currently it does not execute synchronous drops but only calls user implementations of `AsyncDrop::async_drop` associative function and awaits the returned future. It is not complete as it only recurses into arrays, slices, tuples, and structs and does not have same sensible restrictions as the old `Drop` trait implementation like having the same bounds as the type definition, while code assumes their existence (requires a future work).
This current design uses a workaround as it does not create any custom async destructor state machine types for ADTs, but instead uses types defined in the std library called future combinators (deferred_async_drop, chain, ready_unit).
Also I recommend reading my [explainer](https://zetanumbers.github.io/book/async-drop-design.html).
This is a part of the [MCP: Low level components for async drop](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/727) work.
Feature completeness:
- [x] `AsyncDrop` trait
- [ ] `async_drop_in_place_raw`/async drop glue generation support for
- [x] Trivially destructible types (integers, bools, floats, string slices, pointers, references, etc.)
- [x] Arrays and slices (array pointer is unsized into slice pointer)
- [x] ADTs (enums, structs, unions)
- [x] tuple-like types (tuples, closures)
- [ ] Dynamic types (`dyn Trait`, see explainer's [proposed design](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#async-drop-glue-for-dyn-trait))
- [ ] coroutines (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123948)
- [x] Async drop glue includes sync drop glue code
- [x] Cleanup branch generation for `async_drop_in_place_raw`
- [ ] Union rejects non-trivially async destructible fields
- [ ] `AsyncDrop` implementation requires same bounds as type definition
- [ ] Skip trivially destructible fields (optimization)
- [ ] New [`TyKind::AdtAsyncDestructor`](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#adt-async-destructor-types) and get rid of combinators
- [ ] [Synchronously undroppable types](https://github.com/zetanumbers/posts/blob/main/async-drop-design.md#exclusively-async-drop)
- [ ] Automatic async drop at the end of the scope in async context
Add support to intrinsics fallback body
Before this fix, the call to `body()` would crash, since `has_body()` would return true, but we would try to retrieve the body of an intrinsic which is not allowed.
Instead, the `Instance::body()` function will now convert an Intrinsic into an Item before retrieving its body.
Note: I also changed how we monomorphize the instance body. Unfortunately, the call still ICE for some shims.
r? `@oli-obk`
Before this fix, the call to `body()` would crash, since `has_body()`
would return true, but we would try to retrieve the body of an intrinsic
which is not allowed.
Instead, the `Instance::body()` function will now convert an Intrinsic
into an Item before retrieving its body.
rename ptr::from_exposed_addr -> ptr::with_exposed_provenance
As discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/136281-t-opsem/topic/To.20expose.20or.20not.20to.20expose/near/427757066).
The old name, `from_exposed_addr`, makes little sense as it's not the address that is exposed, it's the provenance. (`ptr.expose_addr()` stays unchanged as we haven't found a better option yet. The intended interpretation is "expose the provenance and return the address".)
The new name nicely matches `ptr::without_provenance`.
Add `Ord::cmp` for primitives as a `BinOp` in MIR
Update: most of this OP was written months ago. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118310#issuecomment-2016940014 below for where we got to recently that made it ready for review.
---
There are dozens of reasonable ways to implement `Ord::cmp` for integers using comparison, bit-ops, and branches. Those differences are irrelevant at the rust level, however, so we can make things better by adding `BinOp::Cmp` at the MIR level:
1. Exactly how to implement it is left up to the backends, so LLVM can use whatever pattern its optimizer best recognizes and cranelift can use whichever pattern codegens the fastest.
2. By not inlining those details for every use of `cmp`, we drastically reduce the amount of MIR generated for `derive`d `PartialOrd`, while also making it more amenable to MIR-level optimizations.
Having extremely careful `if` ordering to μoptimize resource usage on broadwell (#63767) is great, but it really feels to me like libcore is the wrong place to put that logic. Similarly, using subtraction [tricks](https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#CopyIntegerSign) (#105840) is arguably even nicer, but depends on the optimizer understanding it (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/73417) to be practical. Or maybe [bitor is better than add](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/representing-in-ir/67369/2?u=scottmcm)? But maybe only on a future version that [has `or disjoint` support](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-or-disjoint-flag/75036?u=scottmcm)? And just because one of those forms happens to be good for LLVM, there's no guarantee that it'd be the same form that GCC or Cranelift would rather see -- especially given their very different optimizers. Not to mention that if LLVM gets a spaceship intrinsic -- [which it should](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Suboptimal.20inlining.20in.20std.20function.20.60binary_search.60/near/404250586) -- we'll need at least a rustc intrinsic to be able to call it.
As for simplifying it in Rust, we now regularly inline `{integer}::partial_cmp`, but it's quite a large amount of IR. The best way to see that is with 8811efa88b (diff-d134c32d028fbe2bf835fef2df9aca9d13332dd82284ff21ee7ebf717bfa4765R113) -- I added a new pre-codegen MIR test for a simple 3-tuple struct, and this PR change it from 36 locals and 26 basic blocks down to 24 locals and 8 basic blocks. Even better, as soon as the construct-`Some`-then-match-it-in-same-BB noise is cleaned up, this'll expose the `Cmp == 0` branches clearly in MIR, so that an InstCombine (#105808) can simplify that to just a `BinOp::Eq` and thus fix some of our generated code perf issues. (Tracking that through today's `if a < b { Less } else if a == b { Equal } else { Greater }` would be *much* harder.)
---
r? `@ghost`
But first I should check that perf is ok with this
~~...and my true nemesis, tidy.~~
Fix misc printing issues in emit=stable_mir
Trying to continue the work that ````@ouz-a```` started here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118364
Few modifications beyond fixes:
1. I made the `pretty_*` functions private.
2. I added a function to print the instance body
3. Changed a bunch of signatures to write to the writer directly.
4. Added a function to translate the place to its internal representation, so we could use the internal debug implementation.
5. Also removed `pretty_ty`, replaced by Display implementation of Ty which uses the internal display.
