Avoid silencing relevant follow-up errors
r? `@matthewjasper`
This PR only adds new errors to tests that are already failing and fixes one ICE.
Several tests were changed to not emit new errors. I believe all of them were faulty tests, and not explicitly testing for the code that had new errors.
When encountering multiple mutable borrows, suggest cloning and adding
derive annotations as needed.
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `sm.x` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:32:9
|
LL | foo(&mut sm.x);
| ^^^^^^^^^ `sm` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: `Str` doesn't implement `Clone`, so this call clones the reference `&Str`
--> $DIR/accidentally-cloning-ref-borrow-error.rs:31:21
|
LL | let mut sm = sr.clone();
| ^^^^^^^
help: consider annotating `Str` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | struct Str {
|
help: consider specifying this binding's type
|
LL | let mut sm: &mut Str = sr.clone();
| ++++++++++
```
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `*inner` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/issue-91206.rs:14:5
|
LL | inner.clear();
| ^^^^^ `inner` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: you can `clone` the `Vec<usize>` value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
--> $DIR/issue-91206.rs:11:17
|
LL | let inner = client.get_inner_ref();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: consider specifying this binding's type
|
LL | let inner: &mut Vec<usize> = client.get_inner_ref();
| +++++++++++++++++
```
When encountering a move error, look for implementations of `Clone` for
the moved type. If there is one, check if all its obligations are met.
If they are, we suggest cloning without caveats. If they aren't, we
suggest cloning while mentioning the unmet obligations, potentially
suggesting `#[derive(Clone)]` when appropriate.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of a shared reference
--> $DIR/suggest-clone-when-some-obligation-is-unmet.rs:20:28
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = map.clone().into_values().collect();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ ------------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `HashMap::<K, V, S>::into_values` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/std/src/collections/hash/map.rs:LL:COL
help: you could `clone` the value and consume it, if the `Hash128_1: Clone` trait bound could be satisfied
|
LL | let mut copy: Vec<U> = <HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1> as Clone>::clone(&map.clone()).into_values().collect();
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
help: consider annotating `Hash128_1` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
|
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | pub struct Hash128_1;
|
```
Fix#109429.
When going through auto-deref, the `<T as Clone>` impl sometimes needs
to be specified for rustc to actually clone the value and not the
reference.
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `S`
--> $DIR/needs-clone-through-deref.rs:15:18
|
LL | for _ in self.clone().into_iter() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `Vec<usize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `into_iter` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rs:LL:COL
help: you can `clone` the value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
|
LL | for _ in <Vec<usize> as Clone>::clone(&self.clone()).into_iter() {}
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +
```
CC #109429.
Fix early param lifetimes in generic_const_exprs
In cases like below, we never actually be able to capture region name for two reasons, first `'static` becomes anonymous lifetime and second we never capture region if it doesn't have a name so this results in ICE.
```
struct DataWrapper<'static> {
data: &'a [u8; Self::SIZE],
}
impl DataWrapper<'a> {
```
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/118021
This is a aspect of Rust that frequently trips up people who are not
aware of it yet. This diagnostic attempts to explain what's happening
and why the lifetime constraint, that was never mentioned in the source,
arose.
Consider alias bounds when computing liveness in NLL (but this time sound hopefully)
This is a revival of #116040, except removing the changes to opaque lifetime captures check to make sure that we're not triggering any unsoundness due to the lack of general existential regions and the currently-existing `ReErased` hack we use instead.
r? `@aliemjay` -- I appreciate you pointing out the unsoundenss in the previous iteration of this PR, and I'd like to hear that you're happy with this iteration of this PR before this goes back into FCP :>
Fixes#116794 as well
---
(mostly copied from #116040 and reworked slightly)
# Background
Right now, liveness analysis in NLL is a bit simplistic. It simply walks through all of the regions of a type and marks them as being live at points. This is problematic in the case of aliases, since it requires that we mark **all** of the regions in their args[^1] as live, leading to bugs like #42940.
In reality, we may be able to deduce that fewer regions are allowed to be present in the projected type (or "hidden type" for opaques) via item bounds or where clauses, and therefore ideally, we should be able to soundly require fewer regions to be live in the alias.
For example:
```rust
trait Captures<'a> {}
impl<T> Captures<'_> for T {}
fn capture<'o>(_: &'o mut ()) -> impl Sized + Captures<'o> + 'static {}
fn test_two_mut(mut x: ()) {
let _f1 = capture(&mut x);
let _f2 = capture(&mut x);
//~^ ERROR cannot borrow `x` as mutable more than once at a time
}
```
In the example above, we should be able to deduce from the `'static` bound on `capture`'s opaque that even though `'o` is a captured region, it *can never* show up in the opaque's hidden type, and can soundly be ignored for liveness purposes.
# The Fix
We apply a simple version of RFC 1214's `OutlivesProjectionEnv` and `OutlivesProjectionTraitDef` rules to NLL's `make_all_regions_live` computation.
Specifically, when we encounter an alias type, we:
1. Look for a unique outlives bound in the param-env or item bounds for that alias. If there is more than one unique region, bail, unless any of the outlives bound's regions is `'static`, and in that case, prefer `'static`. If we find such a unique region, we can mark that outlives region as live and skip walking through the args of the opaque.
2. Otherwise, walk through the alias's args recursively, as we do today.
## Limitation: Multiple choices
This approach has some limitations. Firstly, since liveness doesn't use the same type-test logic as outlives bounds do, we can't really try several options when we're faced with a choice.
If we encounter two unique outlives regions in the param-env or bounds, we simply fall back to walking the opaque via its args. I expect this to be mostly mitigated by the special treatment of `'static`, and can be fixed in a forwards-compatible by a more sophisticated analysis in the future.
## Limitation: Opaque hidden types
Secondly, we do not employ any of these rules when considering whether the regions captured by a hidden type are valid. That causes this code (cc #42940) to fail:
```rust
trait Captures<'a> {}
impl<T> Captures<'_> for T {}
fn a() -> impl Sized + 'static {
b(&vec![])
}
fn b<'o>(_: &'o Vec<i32>) -> impl Sized + Captures<'o> + 'static {}
```
We need to have existential regions to avoid [unsoundness](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116040#issuecomment-1751628189) when an opaque captures a region which is not represented in its own substs but which outlives a region that does.
## Read more
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115822#issuecomment-1731153952 (for the liveness case)
More context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42940#issuecomment-455198309 (for the opaque capture case, which this does not fix)
[^1]: except for bivariant region args in opaques, which will become less relevant when we move onto edition 2024 capture semantics for opaques.
adjust how closure/generator types are printed
I saw `&[closure@$DIR/issue-20862.rs:2:5]` and I thought it is a slice type, because that's usually what `&[_]` is... it took me a while to realize that this is just a confusing printer and actually there's no slice. Let's use something that cannot be mistaken for a regular type.
This function is now used to check `#[panic_handler]`, `start` lang item, `main`, `#[start]` and intrinsic functions.
The diagnosis produced are now closer to the ones produced by trait/impl method signature mismatch.
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `*test` as mutable, as it is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/suggest-mut-iterator.rs:22:9
|
LL | for test in &tests {
| ------ this iterator yields `&` references
LL | test.add(2);
| ^^^^ `test` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be borrowed as mutable
|
help: use a mutable iterator instead
|
LL | for test in &mut tests {
| +++
```
Address #114311.
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary
left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part
of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part,
but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use
indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and
that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an
extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
Don't suggest changing `&self` and `&mut self` in function signature to be mutable when taking `&mut self` in closure
Current suggestion for when taking a mutable reference to `self` in a closure (as an upvar) will produce a machine-applicable suggestion to change the `self` in the function signature to `mut self`, but does not account for the specialness of implicit self in that it can already have `&` and `&mut` (see #111554). This causes the function signature to become `test(&mut mut self)` which does not seem desirable.
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `self` as mutable, as it is not declared as mutable
--> src/sound_player.rs:870:11
|
869 | pub fn test(&mut self) {
| ---- help: consider changing this to be mutable: `mut self`
870 | || test2(&mut self);
| ^^^^^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
```
This PR suppresses the "changing this to be mutable" suggestion if the implicit self is either `ImplicitSelfKind::ImmRef` or `ImplicitSelfKind::MutRef`.
Fixes#111554.
MIR: opt-in normalization of `BasicBlock` and `Local` numbering
This doesn't matter at all for actual codegen, but after spending some time reading pre-codegen MIR, I was wishing I didn't have to jump around so much in reading post-inlining code.
So this add two passes that are off by default for every mir level, but can be enabled (`-Zmir-enable-passes=+ReorderBasicBlocks,+ReorderLocals`) for humans.
tweak "make mut" spans when assigning to locals
Work towards fixing #106857
This PR just cleans up a lot of spans which is helpful before properly fixing the issues. Best reviewed commit-by-commit.
r? `@estebank`
Fix lifetime suggestion for type aliases with objects in them
Fixes an issue identified in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110761#issuecomment-1520678479
This suggestion, like many other borrowck suggestions, are very fragile and there are other ways to trigger strange behavior even after this PR, so this is just a small improvement and not a total rework 💀
Previously, when borrowck failed it would taint all promoteds within the MIR
body. An attempt to evaluated the promoteds would subsequently fail with
spurious "note: erroneous constant used". For example:
```console
...
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:9
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:14
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:19
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
note: erroneous constant used
--> tests/ui/borrowck/tainted-promoteds.rs:7:24
|
7 | a = &0 * &1 * &2 * &3;
| ^^
```
Borrowck failure doesn't indicate that there is anything wrong with
promoteds. Leave them untainted.
Run various queries from other queries instead of explicitly in phases
These are just legacy leftovers from when rustc didn't have a query system. While there are more cleanups of this sort that can be done here, I want to land them in smaller steps.
This phased order of query invocations was already a lie, as any query that looks at types (e.g. the wf checks run before) can invoke e.g. const eval which invokes borrowck, which invokes typeck, ...
Check pattern refutability on THIR
The current `check_match` query is based on HIR, but partially re-lowers HIR into THIR.
This PR proposed to use the results of the `thir_body` query to check matches, instead of re-building THIR.
Most of the diagnostic changes are spans getting shorter, or commas/semicolons not getting removed.
This PR degrades the diagnostic for confusing constants in patterns (`let A = foo()` where `A` resolves to a `const A` somewhere): it does not point ot the definition of `const A` any more.
Desugaring DropAndReplace at MIR build (#107844) fixed issue
70919. Add regressions tests, borrowed from #102078, to ensure we
check for this in the future.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Hill <aa1ronham@gmail.com>
This commit desugars the drop and replace deriving from an
assignment at MIR build, avoiding the construction of the
DropAndReplace terminator (which will be removed in a followign PR)
In order to retain the same error messages for replaces a new
DesugaringKind::Replace variant is introduced.
Consider `tests/ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/issue-102768.stderr`,
the error message where it gives additional notes about where the associated
type is defined, and how the dead code lint doesn't have an article,
like in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/issue-85255.stderr`. They don't have
articles, so it seems unnecessary to have one here.
Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts
This also changes the error message slightly, for two reasons:
- I'm not a fan of saying "value borrowed, by `x`, here"
- it simplifies the error implementation significantly.
