Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes#131298
fix usage of ty decl macro fragments in attributes
See the test case. Due to one missing code path (and also the changes in #137517), using $ty or other specific fragments as part of an attr wouldn't work. $tt used to work since it wouldn't be parsed anywhere along the way.
Closes#137662
Note: there was an existing code path involving `Interpolated` in
`MetaItem::from_tokens` that was dead. This commit transfers that to the
new form, but puts an `unreachable!` call inside it.
Make `#[used]` work when linking with `ld64`
To make `#[used]` work in static libraries, we use the `symbols.o` trick introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95604.
However, the linker shipped with Xcode, ld64, works a bit differently from other linkers; in particular, [it completely ignores undefined symbols by themselves](https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/ld64/blob/ld64-954.16/src/ld/parsers/macho_relocatable_file.cpp#L2455-L2468), and only consider them if they have relocations (something something atoms something fixups, I don't know the details).
So to make the `symbols.o` file work on ld64, we need to actually insert a relocation. That's kinda cumbersome to do though, since the relocation must be valid, and hence must point to a valid piece of machine code, and is hence very architecture-specific.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133491, see that for investigation.
---
Another option would be to pass `-u _foo` to the final linker invocation. This has the problem that `-u` causes the linker to not be able to dead-strip the symbol, which is undesirable. (If we did this, we would possibly also want to do it by putting the arguments in a file by itself, and passing that file via ``@`,` e.g. ``@undefined_symbols.txt`,` similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52699, though that [is only supported since Xcode 12](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode-release-notes/xcode-12-release-notes#Linking), and I'm not sure we wanna bump that).
Various other options that are probably all undesirable as they affect link time performance:
- Pass `-all_load` to the linker.
- Pass `-ObjC` to the linker (the Objective-C support in the linker has different code paths that load more of the binary), and instrument the binaries that contain `#[used]` symbols.
- Pass `-force_load` to libraries that contain `#[used]` symbols.
Failed attempt: Embed `-u _foo` in the object file with `LC_LINKER_OPTION`, akin to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121293. Doesn't work, both because `ld64` doesn't read that from archive members unless it already has a reason to load the member (which is what this PR is trying to make it do), and because `ld64` only support the `-l`, `-needed-l`, `-framework` and `-needed_framework` flags in there.
---
TODO:
- [x] Support all Apple architectures.
- [x] Ensure that this works regardless of the actual type of the symbol.
- [x] Write up more docs.
- [x] Wire up a few proper tests.
`@rustbot` label O-apple
```
warning: cannot find macro `in_root` in the crate root
--> $DIR/key-value-expansion-scope.rs:1:10
|
LL | #![doc = in_root!()]
| ^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #124535 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124535>
= help: import `macro_rules` with `use` to make it callable above its definition
= note: `#[warn(out_of_scope_macro_calls)]` on by default
```
Gets rid of two top-level UI tests which is always great.
Furthermore, move `need-crate-arg-ignore-tidy$x.rs`
from `command/` to `invalid-compile-flags/`.
`command/` concerns `std::process::Command` tests, not CLI tests.
```
error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields
--> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15
|
LL | let _ = 2.l;
| ^
|
help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix
|
LL - let _ = 2.l;
LL + let _ = 2.0f64;
|
```
```
error[E0432]: unresolved import `some_novel_crate`
--> file.rs:1:5
|
1 | use some_novel_crate::Type;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `some_novel_crate`
```
On resolve errors where there might be a missing crate, mention `cargo add foo`:
```
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
--> $DIR/conflicting-impl-with-err.rs:4:11
|
LL | impl From<nope::Thing> for Error {
| ^^^^ use of unresolved module or unlinked crate `nope`
|
= help: if you wanted to use a crate named `nope`, use `cargo add nope` to add it to your `Cargo.toml`
```
- Move `tests/ui/attr-usage-inline.rs` to `tests/ui/attributes/inline/`.
- Briefly document test intent.
- Drop unnecessary `#[allow(dead_code)]` as this is allowed-by-default
for ui test suite.
- Move `tests/ui/attr-shebang.rs` to `tests/ui/attributes/`.
- Downgrade test to `check-pass`, this would fail very early if the
parser did not accept `#![..]` attributes.
- Briefly document test intent.
Lint on combining `#[no_mangle]` and `#[export_name]`
This is my very first contribution to the compiler, even though I read the [chapter about lints](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/diagnostics.html) I'm not very certain that this ~~new lint is done right as a builtin lint~~ PR is right. I appreciate any guidance on how to improve the code.
- Add test for issue #47446
- ~~Implement the new lint `mixed_export_name_and_no_mangle` as a builtin lint (not sure if that is the right way to go)~~ Extend `unused_attributes` lint
- Add suggestion how to fix it
<details>
<summary>Old proposed new lint</summary>
> The `mixed_export_name_and_no_mangle` lint detects usage of both `#[export_name]` and `#[no_mangle]` on the same item which results on `#[no_mangle]` being ignored.
>
> *warn-by-default*
>
> ### Example
>
> ```rust
> #[no_mangle] // ignored
> #[export_name = "foo"] // takes precedences
> pub fn bar() {}
> ```
>
> ### Explanation
>
> The compiler will not respect the `#[no_mangle]` attribute when generating the symbol name for the function, as the `#[export_name]` attribute takes precedence. This can lead to confusion and is unnecessary.
</details>
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
Allow disabling ASan instrumentation for globals
AddressSanitizer adds instrumentation to global variables unless the [`no_sanitize_address`](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#global-attributes) attribute is set on them.
This commit extends the existing `#[no_sanitize(address)]` attribute to set this; previously it only had the desired effect on functions.
(cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39699)
AddressSanitizer adds instrumentation to global variables unless the
[`no_sanitize_address`](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#global-attributes)
attribute is set on them.
This commit extends the existing `#[no_sanitize(address)]` attribute to
set this; previously it only had the desired effect on functions.
Stabilize `unsafe_attributes`
# Stabilization report
## Summary
This is a tracking issue for the RFC 3325: unsafe attributes
We are stabilizing `#![feature(unsafe_attributes)]`, which makes certain attributes considered 'unsafe', meaning that they must be surrounded by an `unsafe(...)`, as in `#[unsafe(no_mangle)]`.
RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#3325
Tracking issue: #123757
## What is stabilized
### Summary of stabilization
Certain attributes will now be designated as unsafe attributes, namely, `no_mangle`, `export_name`, and `link_section` (stable only), and these attributes will need to be called by surrounding them in `unsafe(...)` syntax. On editions prior to 2024, this is simply an edition lint, but it will become a hard error in 2024. This also works in `cfg_attr`, but `unsafe` is not allowed for any other attributes, including proc-macros ones.
```rust
#[unsafe(no_mangle)]
fn a() {}
#[cfg_attr(any(), unsafe(export_name = "c"))]
fn b() {}
```
For a table showing the attributes that were considered to be included in the list to require unsafe, and subsequent reasoning about why each such attribute was or was not included, see [this comment here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124214#issuecomment-2124753464)
## Tests
The relevant tests are in `tests/ui/rust-2024/unsafe-attributes` and `tests/ui/attributes/unsafe`.
Emit an error for invalid use of the linkage attribute
fixes#128486
Currently, the use of the linkage attribute for Mod, Impl,... is incorrectly permitted. This PR will correct this issue by generating errors, and I've also added some UI test cases for it.
Related: #128552.
This commit does the following.
- Renames `collect_tokens_trailing_token` as `collect_tokens`, because
(a) it's annoying long, and (b) the `_trailing_token` bit is less
accurate now that its types have changed.
- In `collect_tokens`, adds a `Option<CollectPos>` argument and a
`UsePreAttrPos` in the return type of `f`. These are used in
`parse_expr_force_collect` (for vanilla expressions) and in
`parse_stmt_without_recovery` (for two different cases of expression
statements). Together these ensure are enough to fix all the problems
with token collection and assoc expressions. The changes to the
`stringify.rs` test demonstrate some of these.
- Adds a new test. The code in this test was causing an assertion
failure prior to this commit, due to an invalid `NodeRange`.
The extra complexity is annoying, but necessary to fix the existing
problems.
Emit an error for invalid use of the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute
fixes#128487.
Currently, the use of the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute for Mod, Impl,... is incorrectly permitted. This PR will correct this issue by generating errors, and I've also added some UI test cases for it.
Referenced #128458. As far as I know, the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute can only be used with functions, so I changed that part to `Fn` and `Method` using `check_applied_to_fn_or_method`. However, I couldn't find explicit documentation on this, so I could be mistaken...
