rustdoc: handle cross-crate RPITITs correctly
Filter out the internal associated types synthesized during the desugaring of RPITITs, they really shouldn't show up in the docs.
This also fixes#113929 since we're no longer invoking `is_impossible_associated_item` (renamed from `is_impossible_method`) which cannot handle them (leading to an ICE). I don't think it makes sense to try to make `is_impossible_associated_item` handle this exotic kind of associated type (CC original author `@compiler-errors).`
@ T-rustdoc reviewers, currently I'm throwing out ITIT assoc tys before cleaning assoc tys at each usage-site. I'm thinking about making `clean_middle_assoc_item` return an `Option<_>` instead and doing the check inside of it to prevent any call sites from forgetting the check for ITITs. Since I wasn't sure if you would like that approach, I didn't go through with it. Let me know what you think.
<details><summary>Explanation on why <code>is_impossible_associated_item(itit_assoc_ty)</code> leads to an ICE</summary>
Given the following code:
```rs
pub trait Trait { fn def<T>() -> impl Default {} }
impl Trait for () {}
```
The generated associated type looks something like (simplified):
```rs
type {opaque#0}<T>: Default = impl Default; // the name is actually `kw::Empty` but this is the `def_path_str` repr
```
The query `is_impossible_associated_item` goes through all predicates of the associated item – in this case `<T as Sized>` – to check if they contain any generic parameters from the (generic) associated type itself. For predicates that don't contain any *own* generics, it does further processing, part of which is instantiating the predicate with the generic arguments of the impl block (which is only correct if they truly don't contain any own generics since they wouldn't get instantiated this way leading to an ICE).
It checks if `parent_def_id(T) == assoc_ty_def_id` to get to know if `T` is owned by the assoc ty. Unfortunately this doesn't work for ITIT assoc tys. In this case, the parent of `T` is `Trait::def` (!) which is the associated function (I'm pretty sure this is very intentional) which is of course not equal to the assoc ty `Trait::{opaque#0}`.
</details>
`@rustbot` label A-cross-crate-reexports
Tweak spans for self arg, fix borrow suggestion for signature mismatch
1. Adjust a suggestion message that was annoying me
2. Fix#112503 by recording the right spans for the `self` part of the `&self` 0th argument
3. Remove the suggestion for adjusting a trait signature on type mismatch, bc that's gonna probably break all the other impls of the trait even if it fixes its one usage 😅
THis significantly complicates `NaiveLayout` logic, but is necessary to
ensure that bounds like `NonNull<T>: PointerLike` hold in generic
contexts.
Also implement exact layout computation for structs.
Reasoning: if the stack is empty, the loop will be infinite,
so the assumption is that the stack can't be non empty. Unwrap
makes the assumption more clear (and removes an indentation level)
Add support for inherent projections in new solver
Not hard to support these, and it cuts out a really big chunk of failing UI tests with `--compare-mode=next-solver`
r? `@lcnr` (feel free to reassign, anyone can review this)
Don't call `predicate_must_hold`-esque functions during fulfillment in intercrate
Fixes#113415
Given that this only happens in `translate_substs`, I don't actually think that this is something that you can weaponize, but it's still sketchy regardless.
r? `@lcnr`
Allow escaping bound vars during `normalize_erasing_regions` in new solver
Add `AllowEscapingBoundVars` to `deeply_normalize`, and use it in the new solver in the `query_normalize` routine.
Ideally, we'd make all `query_normalize` calls handle pass in `AllowEscapingBoundVars` individually, because really the only `query_normalize` call that needs `AllowEscapingBoundVars::Yes` is the one in `try_normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions`, but I think that's kind of overkill. I am happy to be convinced otherwise, though.
r? `@lcnr`
Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT
Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`.
r? `@spastorino`
Structurally resolve in pattern matching when peeling refs in new solver
Let me know if you want me to commit the minimized test:
```rust
fn test() {}
fn test2() {}
fn main() {
let tests: &[(_, fn())] = &[
("test", test),
("test2", test2),
];
for (a, b) in tests {
todo!();
}
}
```
In that test above, the match scrutinee is `<std::vec::Iter<(&'static str, fn())> as Iterator>::Item`, which we cannot peel the refs from.
We also need to structurally resolve in the loop, since structural resolve is inherently shallow. I haven't come up with a test where this matters, but I can if you care.
Also, I removed two other calls to `resolve_vars_with_obligations` in diagnostics code that I'm pretty convinced are not useful.
r? `@lcnr`
Replace RPITIT current impl with new strategy that lowers as a GAT
This PR replaces the current implementation of RPITITs with the new implementation that we had under -Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty flag that lowers the RPIT as a GAT on the trait and on the impls that implement that trait.
Opening this PR as a draft because this goes after #112682, ~#112981~ and ~#112983~.
As soon as those are merged, I can rebase and we should run perf, crater and test a lot.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Don't call `query_normalize` when reporting similar impls
Firstly, It's sketchy to be using `query_normalize` at all during HIR typeck -- it's asking for an ICE 😅. Secondly, we're normalizing an impl trait ref that potentially has parameter types in `ty::ParamEnv::empty()`, which is kinda sketchy as well.
The only UI test change from removing this normalization is that we don't evaluate anonymous constants in impls, which end up giving us really ugly suggestions:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `[X; 35]: Default` is not satisfied
--> /home/gh-compiler-errors/test.rs:4:5
|
4 | <[X; 35] as Default>::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Default` is not implemented for `[X; 35]`
|
= help: the following other types implement trait `Default`:
&[T]
&mut [T]
[T; 32]
[T; core::::array::{impl#30}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#31}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#32}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#33}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#34}::{constant#0}]
and 27 others
```
So just fold the impls with a `BottomUpFolder` that calls `ty::Const::eval`. This doesn't work totally correctly with generic-const-exprs, but it's fine for stable code, and this is error reporting after all.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113413 (Add needs-triage to all new issues)
- #113426 (Don't ICE in `resolve_bound_vars` when associated return-type bounds are in bad positions)
- #113427 (Remove `variances_of` on RPITIT GATs, remove its one use-case)
- #113441 (miri: check that assignments do not self-overlap)
- #113453 (Remove unused from_method from rustc_on_unimplemented)
- #113456 (Avoid calling report_forbidden_specialization for RPITITs)
- #113466 (Update cargo)
- #113467 (Fix comment of `fn_can_unwind`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove unused from_method from rustc_on_unimplemented
Fixes#113439
`on_unimplemented_note` was calling `item_name` for RPITITs and that produced ICEs. I've added a regression test for that but also have removed `from_method` symbol entirely because it wasn't even used and by doing that the `item_name` call was also removed.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`
Needed this in another PR for custom debug impls, and this will also be required to move the new solver into a separate crate that does not use `TyCtxt` so that r-a and friends can depend on the trait solver.
Rebased on top of #113325, only the second and third commits needs reviewing
Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors
Plus a bunch of cleanups.
This should help users debug query cycles due to auto trait checking. We'll probably want to fix cycle errors in most (or all?) cases by looking at the current item's hidden types (new solver does this), and by delaying the auto trait checks to after typeck.
`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`
the `None` case never actually reaches diagnostics so it feels better for diagnostics to be able to rely on the `DefId` being there, cc #113310
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113192 (`assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty` docs)
- #113251 (Use scoped-tls for SMIR to map between TyCtxt and SMIR datastructures)
- #113282 (Update platform-support.md to improve ARM target descriptions)
- #113296 (add flag for enabling global cache usage for proof trees and printing proof trees on error)
- #113324 (implement `ConstEvaluatable` goals in new solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
add flag for enabling global cache usage for proof trees and printing proof trees on error
This adds a few new things:
- `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree=always/never/on-error`
- `always`/`never` were previosuly specifiable by whether the flag exists or not, th new flag is `on_error` which reruns obligations of fulfillment and selection errors with proof tree generation enabled and prints them out
- `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree-uses-cache`
- allows forcing global cache to be used or unused for all generated proof trees, global cache is enabled by default for `always` so that it accurately represents what happend. This flag currently would affect misc uses of `GenerateProofTree::Yes` which will be added in the future for things like diagnostics logic and rustdoc's auto_trait file. We can fix this when we start using proof tree generation for those use cases if it's desirable.
I also changed the output to go straight to stdout instead of going through `debug!` so that `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree` can be adequately used on `nightly` not just a locally built toolchain.
The idea for `on-error` is that it should hopefully make it easier to quickly figure out "why doesnt this code compile"- you just pass in `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree=on-error` and you'll only get proof trees you care about.
---
r? `@lcnr` `@compiler-errors`
Normalize opaques with late-bound vars again
We have a hack in the compiler where if an opaque has escaping late-bound vars, we skip revealing it even though we *could* reveal it from a technical perspective. First of all, this is weird, since we really should be revealing all opaques in `Reveal::All` mode. Second of all, it causes subtle bugs (linked below).
I attempted to fix this in #100980, which was unfortunately reverted due to perf regressions on codebases that used really deeply nested futures in some interesting ways. The worst of which was #103423, which caused the project to hang on build. Another one was #104842, which was just a slow-down, but not a hang. I took some time afterwards to investigate how to rework `normalize_erasing_regions` to take advantage of better caching, but that effort kinda fizzled out (#104133).
However, recently, I was made aware of more bugs whose root cause is not revealing opaques during codegen. That made me want to fix this again -- in the process, interestingly, I took the the minimized example from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103423#issuecomment-1292947043, and it doesn't seem to hang any more...
Thinking about this harder, there have been some changes to the way we lower and typecheck async futures that may have reduced the pathologically large number of outlives obligations (see description of #103423) that we were encountering when normalizing opaques with bound vars the last time around:
* #104321 (lower `async { .. }` directly as a generator that implements `Future`, removing the `from_generator` shim)
* #104833 (removing an `identity_future` fn that was wrapping desugared future generators)
... so given that I can see:
* No significant regression on rust perf bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1600070317)
* No timeouts in crater run I did (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605428952, rechecked failing crates in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605973434)
... and given that this PR:
* Fixes#104601
* Fixes#107557
* Fixes#109464
* Allows us to remove a `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` from codegen (75a8f68183)
I'm inclined to give this another shot at landing this. Best case, it just works -- worst case, we get more examples to study how we need to improve the compiler to make this work.
r? types
Don't emit same goal as input during `wf::unnormalized_obligations`
r? `@aliemjay` cc `@lcnr`
I accidentally pruned the logic to handle `WF(?0)` when writing `wf::unnormalized_obligations`.
idk if you wanted to construct a test first, but this is an obvious fix. Copied the comment from above.
Fixesrust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#36
