Fixes incorrect handling of ADT's drop requirements
Fixes#90024 and a bunch of duplicates.
The main issue was just that the contract of `NeedsDropTypes::adt_components` was inconsistent; the list of types it might return were the generic parameters themselves or the fields of the ADT, depending on the nature of the drop impl. This meant that the caller could not determine whether a `.subst()` call was still needed on those types; it called `.subst()` in all cases, and this led to ICEs when the returned types were the generic params.
First contribution of more than a few lines, so feedback definitely appreciated.
Migrate in-tree crates to 2021
This replaces #89075 (cherry picking some of the commits from there), and closes#88637 and fixes#89074.
It excludes a migration of the library crates for now (see tidy diff) because we have some pending bugs around macro spans to fix there.
I instrumented bootstrap during the migration to make sure all crates moved from 2018 to 2021 had the compatibility warnings applied first.
Originally, the intent was to support cargo fix --edition within bootstrap, but this proved fairly difficult to pull off. We'd need to architect the check functionality to support running cargo check and cargo fix within the same x.py invocation, and only resetting sysroots on check. Further, it was found that cargo fix doesn't behave too well with "not quite workspaces", such as Clippy which has several crates. Bootstrap runs with --manifest-path ... for all the tools, and this makes cargo fix only attempt migration for that crate. We can't use e.g. --workspace due to needing to maintain sysroots for different phases of compilation appropriately.
It is recommended to skip the mass migration of Cargo.toml's to 2021 for review purposes; you can also use `git diff d6cd2c6c87 -I'^edition = .20...$'` to ignore the edition = 2018/21 lines in the diff.
Since RFC 3052 soft deprecated the authors field anyway, hiding it from
crates.io, docs.rs, and making Cargo not add it by default, and it is
not generally up to date/useful information, we should remove it from
crates in this repo.
For example, drop glue generated for struct below, doesn't have any
statements, only terminators. Previously it received an estimate of 0,
the new estimate is 13 (6+5 drop terminators, +1 resume, +1 return).
struct S {
a: String,
b: String,
c: String,
d: String,
e: String,
f: String,
}
Originally reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69382#issue-569392141
Such structures may contain self-references, in which case the
same location may be accessible through a pointer that is not
based-on the noalias pointer.
This is still grey area as far as language semantics are concerned,
but checking for !Unpin as an indicator for self-referential
sturctures seems like a good approach for the meantime.
