Support return-type bounds on associated methods from supertraits
Support `T: Trait<method(): Bound>` when `method` comes from a supertrait, aligning it with the behavior of associated type bounds (both equality and trait bounds).
The only wrinkle is that I have to extend `super_predicates_that_define_assoc_type` to look for *all* items, not just `AssocKind::Ty`. This will also be needed to support `feature(associated_const_equality)` as well, which is subtly broken when it comes to supertraits, though this PR does not fix those yet. There's a slight chance there's a perf regression here, in which case I guess I could split it out into a separate query.
Emit while_true lint spanning the entire loop condition
The lint that suggests `loop {}` instead of `while true {}` has functionality to 'pierce' parenthesis in cases like `while (true) {}`. In these cases, the emitted span only went to the hi of the `true` itself, not spanning the entire loop condition.
Before:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
After:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
This is especially a problem for rustfix.
added TraitAlias to check_item() for missing_docs
As in issue #111025 the `missing_docs` was not being triggered for trait aliases. I added `TraitAlias` to the pattern match for check_item(), and the lint seems to be behaving appropriately
Operand::extract_field: only cast llval if it's a pointer and replace bitcast w/ pointercast.
Fixes#105439.
Also cc `@erikdesjardins,` looks like another place to cleanup as part of #105545
Expand the LLVM coverage of `--print target-cpus`
We've been relying on a custom patch to add `MCSubtargetInfo::getCPUTable`
for `rustc --print target-cpus`, and just printing that it's not supported
on external LLVM builds. LLVM `main` now has `getAllProcessorDescriptions`
that can replace ours, so now we try to use that. In addition, the fallback
path can at least print the native and default cpu options.
There were also some mismatches in the function signatures here between
`LLVM_RUSTLLVM` and otherwise; this is now mitigated by sharing these
functions and only using cpp to adjust the function bodies.
Output LLVM optimization remark kind in `-Cremark` output
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90833, the optimization remark kind has not been printed. Therefore it wasn't possible to easily determine from the log (in a programmatic way) which remark kind was produced. I think that the most interesting remarks are the missed ones, which can lead users to some code optimization.
Maybe we could also change the format closer to the "old" one:
```
note: optimization remark for tailcallelim at /checkout/src/libcore/num/mod.rs:1:0: marked this call a tail call candidate
```
I wanted to programatically parse the remarks so that they could work e.g. with https://github.com/OfekShilon/optview2. However, now that I think about it, probably the proper solution is to tell rustc to output them to YAML and then use the YAML as input for the opt remark visualization tools. The flag for enabling this does not seem to work though (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96705#issuecomment-1117632322).
Still I think that it's good to output the remark kind anyway, it's an important piece of information.
r? ```@tmiasko```
The lint that suggests `loop {}` instead of `while true {}` has functionality to 'pierce' parenthesis
in cases like `while (true) {}`. In these cases, the emitted span only went to the hi of the `true`
itself, not spanning the entire loop condition.
Before:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
After:
```
warning: denote infinite loops with `loop { ... }`
--> /tmp/foobar.rs:2:5
|
2 | while ((((((true)))))) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use `loop`
|
= note: `#[warn(while_true)]` on by default
```
More robust debug assertions for `Instance::resolve` on built-in traits with non-standard trait items
In #111264, a user added a new item to the `Future` trait, but the code in [`resolve_associated_item`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ty_utils/instance/fn.resolve_associated_item.html) implicitly assumes that the `Future` trait is defined with only one method (`Future::poll`) and treats the generator body as the implementation of that method.
This PR adds some debug assertions to make sure that that new methods defined on `Future`/`Generator`/etc. don't accidentally resolve to the wrong item when they are added, and adds a helpful comment guiding a compiler dev (or curious `#![no_core]` user) to what must be done to support adding new associated items to these built-in implementations.
I am open to discuss whether a test should be added, but I chose against it because I opted to make these `bug!()`s instead of, e.g., diagnostics or fatal errors. Arguably it doesn't need a test because it's not a bug that can be triggered by an end user, and internal-facing misuses of core kind of touch on rust-lang/compiler-team#620 -- however, I think the assertions I added in this PR are still a very useful way to make sure this bug doesn't waste debugging resources down the line.
Fixes#111264
add hint for =< as <=
Adds a compiler hint for when `=<` is typed instead of `<=`
Example hint:
```rust
fn foo() {
if 1 =< 3 {
println!("Hello, World!");
}
}
```
```
error: expected type, found `3`
--> main.rs:2:13
|
2 | if 1 =< 3 {
| -- ^ expected type
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
This PR only emits the suggestion if there is no space between the `=` and `<`. This hopefully narrows the scope of when this error is emitted, however this still allows this error to be emitted in cases such as this:
```
error: expected expression, found `;`
--> main.rs:2:18
|
2 | if 1 =< [i32;; 3]>::hello() {
| -- ^ expected expression
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
Which could be a good reason not to merge since I haven't been able to think of any other ways of narrowing the scope of this diagnostic.
closes#111128
debuginfo: split method declaration and definition
When we're adding a method to a type DIE, we only want a DW_AT_declaration
there, because LLVM LTO can't unify type definitions when a child DIE is a
full subprogram definition. Now the subprogram definition gets added at the
CU level with a specification link back to the abstract declaration.
Both GCC and Clang write debuginfo this way for C++ class methods.
Fixes#109730.
Fixes#109934.
Make the BUG_REPORT_URL configurable by tools
This greatly simplifies how hard it is to set a custom bug report url; previously tools had to copy
the entire hook implementation.
I haven't changed clippy in case they want to make the change upstream instead of the subtree, but
I'm happy to do so here if the maintainers want - cc ````@rust-lang/clippy````
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109486.
Use fulfillment to check `Drop` impl compatibility
Use an `ObligationCtxt` to ensure that a `Drop` impl does not have stricter requirements than the ADT that it's implemented for, rather than using a `SimpleEqRelation` to (more or less) syntactically equate predicates on an ADT with predicates on an impl.
r? types
### Some background
The old code reads:
```rust
// An earlier version of this code attempted to do this checking
// via the traits::fulfill machinery. However, it ran into trouble
// since the fulfill machinery merely turns outlives-predicates
// 'a:'b and T:'b into region inference constraints. It is simpler
// just to look for all the predicates directly.
```
I'm not sure what this means, but perhaps in the 8 years since that this comment was written (cc #23638) it's gotten easier to process region constraints after doing fulfillment? I don't know how this logic differs from anything we do in the `compare_impl_item` module. Ironically, later on it says:
```rust
// However, it may be more efficient in the future to batch
// the analysis together via the fulfill (see comment above regarding
// the usage of the fulfill machinery), rather than the
// repeated `.iter().any(..)` calls.
```
Also:
* Removes `SimpleEqRelation` which was far too syntactical in its relation.
* Fixes#110557
Add `force` option for `--extern` flag
When `--extern force:foo=libfoo.so` is passed to `rustc` and `foo` is not actually used in the crate, ~inject an `extern crate foo;` statement into the AST~ force it to be resolved anyway in `CrateLoader::postprocess()`. This allows you to, for instance, inject a `#[panic_handler]` implementation into a `#![no_std]` crate without modifying its source so that it can be built as a `dylib`. It may also be useful for `#![panic_runtime]` or `#[global_allocator]`/`#![default_lib_allocator]` implementations.
My work previously involved integrating Rust into an existing C/C++ codebase which was built with Buck and shipped on, among other platforms, Android. When targeting Android, Buck builds all "native" code with shared linkage* so it can be loaded from Java/Kotlin. My project was not itself `#![no_std]`, but many of our dependencies were, and they would fail to build with shared linkage due to a lack of a panic handler. With this change, that project can add the new `force` option to the `std` dependency it already explicitly provides to every crate to solve this problem.
*This is an oversimplification - Buck has a couple features for aggregating dependencies into larger shared libraries, but none that I think sustainably solve this problem.
~The AST injection happens after macro expansion around where we similarly inject a test harness and proc-macro harness. The resolver's list of actually-used extern flags is populated during macro expansion, and if any of our `--extern` arguments have the `force` option and weren't already used, we inject an `extern crate` statement for them. The injection logic was added in `rustc_builtin_macros` as that's where similar injections for tests, proc-macros, and std/core already live.~
(New contributor - grateful for feedback and guidance!)
We've been relying on a custom patch to add `MCSubtargetInfo::getCPUTable`
for `rustc --print target-cpus`, and just printing that it's not supported
on external LLVM builds. LLVM `main` now has `getAllProcessorDescriptions`
that can replace ours, so now we try to use that. In addition, the fallback
path can at least print the native and default cpu options.
There were also some mismatches in the function signatures here between
`LLVM_RUSTLLVM` and otherwise; this is now mitigated by sharing these
functions and only using cpp to adjust the function bodies.
Mark `ErrorGuaranteed` constructor as deprecated so people don't use it
You should never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever use this function unless you know what you're doing, so make it harder to accidentally use it!
Alternatives are to change the name to sound scarier, make it `unsafe` (though it's not really a soundness thing), or work on deeper refactors to make it private.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Stabilize raw-dylib, link_ordinal, import_name_type and -Cdlltool
This stabilizes the `raw-dylib` feature (#58713) for all architectures (i.e., `x86` as it is already stable for all other architectures).
Changes:
* Permit the use of the `raw-dylib` link kind for x86, the `link_ordinal` attribute and the `import_name_type` key for the `link` attribute.
* Mark the `raw_dylib` feature as stable.
* Stabilized the `-Zdlltool` argument as `-Cdlltool`.
* Note the path to `dlltool` if invoking it failed (we don't need to do this if `dlltool` returns an error since it prints its path in the error message).
* Adds tests for `-Cdlltool`.
* Adds tests for being unable to find the dlltool executable, and dlltool failing.
* Fixes a bug where we were checking the exit code of dlltool to see if it failed, but dlltool always returns 0 (indicating success), so instead we need to check if anything was written to `stderr`.
NOTE: As previously noted (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104218#issuecomment-1315895618) using dlltool within rustc is temporary, but this is not the first time that Rust has added a temporary tool use and argument: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104218#issuecomment-1318720482
Big thanks to ``````@tbu-`````` for the first version of this PR (#104218)
Improve check-cfg implementation
This PR makes multiple improvements into the implementation of check-cfg, it is a prerequisite to a follow-up PR that will introduce a simpler and more explicit syntax.
The 2 main area of improvements are:
1. Internal representation of expected values:
- now uses `FxHashSet<Option<Symbol>>` instead of `FxHashSet<Symbol>`, it made the no value expected case only possible when no values where in the `HashSet` which is now represented as `None` (same as cfg represent-it).
- a enum with `Some` and `Any` makes it now clear if some values are expected or not, necessary for `feature` and `target_feature`.
2. Diagnostics: Improve the diagnostics in multiple case and fix case where a missing value could have had a new name suggestion instead of the value diagnostic; and some drive by improvements
I highly recommend reviewing commit by commit.
r? `@petrochenkov`
