Define a dedicated error type for `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`.
Define `NullHandleError` and `InvalidHandleError` types, that implement std::error::Error, and use them as the error types in `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid`,
This addresses [this concern](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87074#issuecomment-1080031167).
This is the same as #95387.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92569 (Improve Error Messaging for Unconstructed Structs and Enum Variants in Generic Contexts)
- #96370 (Cleanup `report_method_error` a bit)
- #96383 (Fix erased region escaping into wfcheck due to #95395)
- #96385 (Recover most `impl Trait` and `dyn Trait` lifetime bound suggestions under NLL)
- #96410 (rustdoc: do not write `{{root}}` in `pub use ::foo` docs)
- #96430 (Fix handling of `!` in rustdoc search)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Recover most `impl Trait` and `dyn Trait` lifetime bound suggestions under NLL
This is done by replacing the duplicated (and very partial) implementation from borrowck with one inspsired from `NiceRegionError::try_report_static_impl_trait` and by re-using `suggest_new_region_bound`.
Fixes#96277
r? ```@jackh726```
Fix erased region escaping into wfcheck due to #95395
We can just use `liberate_late_bound_regions` instead of `erase_late_bound_regions`... This gives us `ReEarlyBound` instead of `ReErased`, the former being something typeck actually knows how to deal with...
Fixes#96381
Side-note: We only actually get far enough in the compiler pipeline to cause this ICE when we're invoking rustdoc. We actually abort rustc right before wfcheck because of the error that we emit (having `_` in the type signature). Why does rustdoc keep going even though we raise an error?
Cleanup `report_method_error` a bit
1. Remove an unnecessary indentation level
2. Split out a couple of large functions from this humongo function body
Improve Error Messaging for Unconstructed Structs and Enum Variants in Generic Contexts
Improves error messaging for empty-tuple structs and enum variants in certain generic contexts. See new ui tests for examples.
Closes#87181
Fix incremental perf regression unsafety checking
Perf regression introduced in #96294
We will simply avoid emitting the name of the unsafe function in MIR unsafeck, since we're moving to THIR unsafeck anyway.
The code currently ignores the actual delimiter on the RHS and fakes up
a `NoDelim`/`DelimSpan::dummy()` one. This commit changes it to use the
actual delimiter.
The commit also reorders the fields for the `Delimited` variant to match
the `Sequence` variant.
Correct documentation for `Rvalue::ShallowInitBox`
As a part of the big MIR docs PR, I had added a comment indicating that `Rvalue::ShallowInitBox` is disallowed after drop elaboration, but this is not true (no idea why I thought it was). Codegen has support for it, and trying to enforce this rule in the validator causes compiling core to ICE on the very first `box` statement.
That being said, this `Rvalue` probably *should* be banned after drop elaboration - it doesn't seem like it's still useful for much. However, I do not have time right now to actually go investigate how difficult a change that is to make, so in the meantime fixing the docs to reflect the current situation seems like the right step.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
simplify `describe_field` func in borrowck's diagnostics part
This PR simplify the `describe_field` func in borrowck's diagnostics part, besides fix the FIXME in it.
Suggest calling method on nested field when struct is missing method
Similar to the suggestion to change `x.field` to `x.nested.field`, implement a similar suggestion for when `x.method()` should be replaced with `x.nested.method()`.
Fix codegen bug in "ptx-kernel" abi related to arg passing
I found a codegen bug in the nvptx abi related to that args are passed as ptrs ([see comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38788#issuecomment-1048999928)), this is not as specified in the [ptx-interoperability doc](https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/ptx-writers-guide-to-interoperability/) or how C/C++ does it. It will also almost always fail in practice since device/host uses different memory spaces for most hardware.
This PR fixes the bug and add tests for passing structs to ptx kernels.
I observed that all nvptx assembly tests had been marked as [ignore a long time ago](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59752#issuecomment-501713428). I'm not sure if the new one should be marked as ignore, it passed on my computer but it might fail if ptx-linker is missing on the server? I guess this is outside scope for this PR and should be looked at in a different issue/PR.
I only fixed the nvptx64-nvidia-cuda target and not the potential code paths for the non-existing 32bit target. Even though 32bit nvptx is not a supported target there are still some code under the hood supporting codegen for 32 bit ptx. I was advised to create an MCP to find out if this code should be removed or updated.
Perhaps ``@RDambrosio016`` would have interest in taking a quick look at this.
Clarify that `Cow::into_owned` returns owned data
Two sections of the `Cow::into_owned` docs imply that `into_owned` returns a `Cow`. Clarify that it returns the underlying owned object, either cloned or extracted from the `Cow`.
