Currently the opts_present() function only checks to see if the option is
configured in the match, but doesn't actually check to see if the option
value has been set. This means that opt_present('h') may return false while
opts_present([~'h']) returns true.
Add a test case to catch this condition and fix opts_present() to check
the value before returning true.
Note, there is another API difference between these two functions that this
does not address. Currently if you pass a non-configured option to
opt_present() the program will fail!(), but opts_present() simply returns
false. If it is acceptable to standardize on the fail!() then opts_present()
should probably be implemented in terms of the opt_present() function.
This will allow you to use the + operator to add together any two
Options, assuming that the contents of each Option likewise implement
+. So Some(4) + Some(1) == Some(5), and adding with None leaves the
other value unchanged.
This might be monoidic? I don't know what that word means!
This is due to the way different versions of gdb print out structs: older versions have them always spread out with fields on different lines, while newer versions will compactly print them on one line. This makes it hard for the output checker to verify the expected output.
Struct and enum representations have some complicatedness that's no longer needed. Now that everything's in one place and has access to anything we'd want to know about the type, flatten some of that out. Slight changes to representations in some cases.
The only thing we really lose is that C-like enums with one variant and a
non-zero discriminant now take up space, but I do not think this is a
common usage. As previously noted, that was mostly there for
transitional compatibility with the pre-adt.rs codebase.
Out goes the extra layer of struct wrapping; the destructedness flag is
added to the end of the struct. This means that, if the struct
previously had alignment padding at the end, the flag will live there
instead of increasing the struct size.
There were three issues effecting the example in the getopts rustdoc:
1. The blockquote was incorrectly formatted. Fixed by switching to using
an explicit markdown code section with ```.
2. The `fail fail_str(f)` would not compile. Fixed by using `fail!()` instead
of `fail`.
3. The line `matches.free[0]` produced a compile error about moving from
an immutable vector. Fix by using `copy`.
Previous year range of 2011-2013 was based on file creation date. The
check_license python script, however, only accepts copyrights starting
in 2012 or later.
