Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
surechen
40ae34194c remove redundant imports
detects redundant imports that can be eliminated.

for #117772 :

In order to facilitate review and modification, split the checking code and
removing redundant imports code into two PR.
2023-12-10 10:56:22 +08:00
jyn
eb53721a34 recurse into refs when comparing tys for diagnostics 2023-12-07 23:00:46 -05:00
Esteban Küber
a8faa8288c Fix rebase 2023-12-04 22:00:34 +00:00
Esteban Küber
a754fcaa43 On "this .clone() is on the reference", provide more info
When encountering a case where `let x: T = (val: &T).clone();` and
`T: !Clone`, already mention that the reference is being cloned. We now
also suggest `#[derive(Clone)]` not only on `T` but also on type
parameters to satisfy blanket implementations.

```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:17:39
   |
LL |             let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
   |                        ------------   ^^^^^^^^^ expected `HashSet<Day>`, found `&HashSet<Day>`
   |                        |
   |                        expected due to this
   |
   = note: expected struct `HashSet<Day>`
           found reference `&HashSet<Day>`
note: `HashSet<Day>` does not implement `Clone`, so `&HashSet<Day>` was cloned instead
  --> $DIR/assignment-of-clone-call-on-ref-due-to-missing-bound.rs:17:39
   |
LL |             let mut x: HashSet<Day> = v.clone();
   |                                       ^
   = help: `Clone` is not implemented because the trait bound `Day: Clone` is not satisfied
help: consider annotating `Day` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
   |
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | enum Day {
   |
```

Case taken from # #41825.
2023-12-04 21:54:33 +00:00
Esteban Küber
90db536741 Tweak output on specific case 2023-12-04 21:54:32 +00:00
Esteban Küber
98cfed7b97 Suggest cloning and point out obligation errors on move error
When encountering a move error, look for implementations of `Clone` for
the moved type. If there is one, check if all its obligations are met.
If they are, we suggest cloning without caveats. If they aren't, we
suggest cloning while mentioning the unmet obligations, potentially
suggesting `#[derive(Clone)]` when appropriate.

```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of a shared reference
  --> $DIR/suggest-clone-when-some-obligation-is-unmet.rs:20:28
   |
LL |     let mut copy: Vec<U> = map.clone().into_values().collect();
   |                            ^^^^^^^^^^^ ------------- value moved due to this method call
   |                            |
   |                            move occurs because value has type `HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
   |
note: `HashMap::<K, V, S>::into_values` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
  --> $SRC_DIR/std/src/collections/hash/map.rs:LL:COL
help: you could `clone` the value and consume it, if the `Hash128_1: Clone` trait bound could be satisfied
   |
LL |     let mut copy: Vec<U> = <HashMap<T, U, Hash128_1> as Clone>::clone(&map.clone()).into_values().collect();
   |                            ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++           +
help: consider annotating `Hash128_1` with `#[derive(Clone)]`
   |
LL + #[derive(Clone)]
LL | pub struct Hash128_1;
   |
```

Fix #109429.
2023-12-04 21:54:32 +00:00
Esteban Küber
03c88aaf21 Tweak .clone() suggestion to work in more cases
When going through auto-deref, the `<T as Clone>` impl sometimes needs
to be specified for rustc to actually clone the value and not the
reference.

```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `S`
  --> $DIR/needs-clone-through-deref.rs:15:18
   |
LL |         for _ in self.clone().into_iter() {}
   |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- value moved due to this method call
   |                  |
   |                  move occurs because value has type `Vec<usize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
   |
note: `into_iter` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
  --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rs:LL:COL
help: you can `clone` the value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
   |
LL |         for _ in <Vec<usize> as Clone>::clone(&self.clone()).into_iter() {}
   |                  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++            +
```

CC #109429.
2023-12-04 21:54:32 +00:00
Nilstrieb
41e8d152dc Show number in error message even for one error
Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
2023-11-24 19:15:52 +01:00
Caio
5a69151d7d Move tests 2023-08-28 17:47:37 -03:00
Esteban Küber
edc3e26773 Account for Rc and Arc when suggesting to clone
When suggesting to clone a reference-counted value, be less uncertain.
2023-08-04 17:50:12 +00:00
Michael Goulet
a74db1abb3 Fix another strange suggestion span 2023-07-10 20:09:28 +00:00
Michael Goulet
3a3f4a2144 Don't use method span on clone suggestion 2023-07-10 20:09:28 +00:00
Michael Goulet
fe870424a7 Do not set up wrong span for adjustments 2023-07-10 20:09:26 +00:00
Caio
d75e43c371 Move tests 2023-02-16 11:42:35 -03:00
Nilstrieb
832751fe1d Also erase substs for new infcx in pin move error
The code originally correctly erased the regions of the type it passed
to the newly created infcx. But after the `fn_sig` query was made to
return an `EarlyBinder<T>`, some substs that were around were
substituted there without erasing their regions. They were then passed
into the newly cerated infcx, which caused the ICE.
2023-01-28 20:43:16 +01:00
Esteban Küber
7b8251e188 Account for method call and indexing when looking for inner-most path in expression 2023-01-17 02:52:43 +00:00
Albert Larsan
cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests 2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00