removing TLS support in x86_64-unknown-none-hermitkernel
HermitCore's kernel itself doesn't support TLS. Consequently, the entries in x86_64-unknown-none-hermitkernel should be removed. This commit should help to finalize #89062.
linux/aarch64 Now() should be actually_monotonic()
While issues have been seen on arm64 platforms the Arm architecture requires
that the counter monotonically increases and that it must provide a uniform
view of system time (e.g. it must not be possible for a core to receive a
message from another core with a time stamp and observe time going backwards
(ARM DDI 0487G.b D11.1.2). While there have been a few 64bit SoCs that have
bugs (#49281, #56940) which cause time to not monotonically increase, these have
been fixed in the Linux kernel and we shouldn't penalize all Arm SoCs for those
who refuse to update their kernels:
SUN50I_ERRATUM_UNKNOWN1 - Allwinner A64 / Pine A64 - fixed in 5.1
FSL_ERRATUM_A008585 - Freescale LS2080A/LS1043A - fixed in 4.10
HISILICON_ERRATUM_161010101 - Hisilicon 1610 - fixed in 4.11
ARM64_ERRATUM_858921 - Cortex A73 - fixed in 4.12
255a3f3e18 std: Force `Instant::now()` to be monotonic added a Mutex to work around
this problem and a small test program using glommio shows the majority of time spent
acquiring and releasing this Mutex. 3914a7b0da tries to improve this, but actually
makes it worse on big systems as for 128b atomics a ldxp/stxp pair (and successful loop)
for v8.4 systems that don't support FEAT_LSE2 is required which is expensive as a lock
and because of how the load/store-exclusives scale on large Arm systems is both unfair
to threads and tends to go backwards in performance.
A small sample program using glommio improves by 70x on a 32 core Graviton2
system with this change.
[fuchsia] Update process info struct
The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to
using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct.
This change migrates libstd.
See [fxrev.dev/510478](https://fxrev.dev/510478) and [fxbug.dev/30751](https://fxbug.dev/30751) for more detail.
Add abstract namespace support for Unix domain sockets
Hello! The other day I wanted to mess around with UDS in Rust and found that abstract namespaces ([unix(7)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/unix.7.html)) on Linux still needed development. I took the approach of adding `_addr` specific public functions to reduce conflicts.
Feature name: `unix_socket_abstract`
Tracking issue: #85410
Further context: #42048
## Non-platform specific additions
`UnixListener::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixListener>`
`UnixStream::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixDatagram>`
`UnixDatagram::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::send_to_addr(&self, &[u8], &SocketAddr) -> Result<usize>`
## Platform-specific (Linux) additions
`SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(&[u8]) -> SocketAddr`
`SockerAddr::as_abstract_namespace() -> Option<&[u8]>`
## Example
```rust
#![feature(unix_socket_abstract)]
use std::os::unix::net::{UnixListener, SocketAddr};
fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
let addr = SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(b"namespace")?; // Linux only
let listener = match UnixListener::bind_addr(&addr) {
Ok(sock) => sock,
Err(err) => {
println!("Couldn't bind: {:?}", err);
return Err(err);
}
};
Ok(())
}
```
## Further Details
The main inspiration for the implementation came from the [nix-rust](https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/blob/master/src/sys/socket/addr.rs#L558) crate but there are also other [historical](c4db0685b1) [attempts](https://github.com/tormol/uds/blob/master/src/addr.rs#L324) with similar approaches.
A comment I did have was with this change, we now allow a `SocketAddr` to be constructed explicitly rather than just used almost as a handle for the return of `peer_addr` and `local_addr`. We could consider adding other explicit constructors (e.g. `SocketAddr::from_pathname`, `SockerAddr::from_unnamed`).
Cheers!
Use BCryptGenRandom instead of RtlGenRandom on Windows.
This removes usage of RtlGenRandom on Windows, in favour of BCryptGenRandom.
BCryptGenRandom isn't available on XP, but we dropped XP support a while ago.
The fuchsia platform is in the process of softly transitioning over to
using a new value for ZX_INFO_PROCESS with a new corresponding struct.
This change migrates libstd.
See fxrev.dev/510478 and fxbug.dev/30751 for more detail.
Fix ctrl-c causing reads of stdin to return empty on Windows.
Pressing ctrl+c (or ctrl+break) on Windows caused a blocking read of stdin to unblock and return empty, unlike other platforms which continue to block.
On ctrl-c, `ReadConsoleW` will return success, but also set `LastError` to `ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED`.
This change detects this case, and re-tries the call to `ReadConsoleW`.
Fixes#89177. See issue for further details.
Tested on Windows 7 and Windows 10 with both MSVC and GNU toolchains
Improve `std:🧵:available_parallelism` docs
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74479_
This PR reworks the documentation of `std:🧵:available_parallelism`, as requested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89324#issuecomment-934343254).
## Changes
The following changes are made:
- We've removed prior mentions of "hardware threads" and instead centers the docs around "parallelism" as a resource available to a program.
- We now provide examples of when `available_parallelism` may return numbers that differ from the number of CPU cores in the host machine.
- We now mention that the amount of available parallelism may change over time.
- We make note of which platform components we don't take into account which more advanced users may want to take note of.
- The example has been updated, which should be a bit easier to use.
- We've added a docs alias to `num-cpus` which provides similar functionality to `available_parallelism`, and is one of the most popular crates on crates.io.
---
Thanks!
r? `@BurntSushi`
Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests
I threw in `std::path::Path::has_root` for funsies.
A continuation of #89718.
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to non-mutating verb methods
These are methods that could be misconstrued to mutate their input, similar to #89694. I gave each one a different custom message.
I wrote that `upgrade` and `downgrade` don't modify the input pointers. Logically they don't, but technically they do...
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Add #[must_use] to from_value conversions
I added two methods to the list myself. Clippy did not flag them because they take `mut` args, but neither modifies their argument.
```rust
core::str const unsafe fn from_utf8_unchecked_mut(v: &mut [u8]) -> &mut str;
std::ffi::CString unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString;
```
I put a custom note on `from_raw`:
```rust
#[must_use = "call `drop(from_raw(ptr))` if you intend to drop the `CString`"]
pub unsafe fn from_raw(ptr: *mut c_char) -> CString {
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ``@joshtriplett``
Add new tier-3 target: armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf
This change adds a new tier-3 target: armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf
This target is primarily used in embedded linux devices where system resources are slim and glibc is deemed too heavyweight. Cross compilation C toolchains are available [here](https://toolchains.bootlin.com/) or via [buildroot](https://buildroot.org).
The change is based largely on a previous PR #79380 with a few minor modifications. The author of that PR was unable to push the PR forward, and graciously allowed me to take it over.
Per the [target tier 3 policy](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2803-target-tier-policy.md), I volunteer to be the "target maintainer".
This is my first PR to Rust itself, so I apologize if I've missed things!
Add #[must_use] to string/char transformation methods
These methods could be misconstrued as modifying their arguments instead of returning new values.
Where possible I made the note recommend a method that does mutate in place.
Parent issue: #89692
Fix minor std::thread documentation typo
callers of spawn_unchecked() need to make sure that the thread
not outlive references in the passed closure, not the other way around.
Optimize File::read_to_end and read_to_string
Reading a file into an empty vector or string buffer can incur unnecessary `read` syscalls and memory re-allocations as the buffer "warms up" and grows to its final size. This is perhaps a necessary evil with generic readers, but files can be read in smarter by checking the file size and reserving that much capacity.
`std::fs::read` and `std::fs::read_to_string` already perform this optimization: they open the file, reads its metadata, and call `with_capacity` with the file size. This ensures that the buffer does not need to be resized and an initial string of small `read` syscalls.
However, if a user opens the `File` themselves and calls `file.read_to_end` or `file.read_to_string` they do not get this optimization.
```rust
let mut buf = Vec::new();
file.read_to_end(&mut buf)?;
```
I searched through this project's codebase and even here are a *lot* of examples of this. They're found all over in unit tests, which isn't a big deal, but there are also several real instances in the compiler and in Cargo. I've documented the ones I found in a comment here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89516#issuecomment-934423999
Most telling, the documentation for both the `Read` trait and the `Read::read_to_end` method both show this exact pattern as examples of how to use readers. What this says to me is that this shouldn't be solved by simply fixing the instances of it in this codebase. If it's here it's certain to be prevalent in the wider Rust ecosystem.
To that end, this commit adds specializations of `read_to_end` and `read_to_string` directly on `File`. This way it's no longer a minor footgun to start with an empty buffer when reading a file in.
A nice side effect of this change is that code that accesses a `File` as `impl Read` or `dyn Read` will benefit. For example, this code from `compiler/rustc_serialize/src/json.rs`:
```rust
pub fn from_reader(rdr: &mut dyn Read) -> Result<Json, BuilderError> {
let mut contents = Vec::new();
match rdr.read_to_end(&mut contents) {
```
Related changes:
- I also added specializations to `BufReader` to delegate to `self.inner`'s methods. That way it can call `File`'s optimized implementations if the inner reader is a file.
- The private `std::io::append_to_string` function is now marked `unsafe`.
- `File::read_to_string` being more efficient means that the performance note for `io::read_to_string` can be softened. I've added `@camelid's` suggested wording from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80218#issuecomment-936806502.
r? `@joshtriplett`
These methods could be misconstrued as modifying their arguments instead
of returning new values.
Where possible I made the note recommend a method that does mutate in
place.
Reading a file into an empty vector or string buffer can incur
unnecessary `read` syscalls and memory re-allocations as the buffer
"warms up" and grows to its final size. This is perhaps a necessary evil
with generic readers, but files can be read in smarter by checking the
file size and reserving that much capacity.
`std::fs::read` and `read_to_string` already perform this optimization:
they open the file, reads its metadata, and call `with_capacity` with
the file size. This ensures that the buffer does not need to be resized
and an initial string of small `read` syscalls.
However, if a user opens the `File` themselves and calls
`file.read_to_end` or `file.read_to_string` they do not get this
optimization.
```rust
let mut buf = Vec::new();
file.read_to_end(&mut buf)?;
```
I searched through this project's codebase and even here are a *lot* of
examples of this. They're found all over in unit tests, which isn't a
big deal, but there are also several real instances in the compiler and
in Cargo. I've documented the ones I found in a comment here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89516#issuecomment-934423999
Most telling, the `Read` trait and the `read_to_end` method both show
this exact pattern as examples of how to use readers. What this says to
me is that this shouldn't be solved by simply fixing the instances of it
in this codebase. If it's here it's certain to be prevalent in the wider
Rust ecosystem.
To that end, this commit adds specializations of `read_to_end` and
`read_to_string` directly on `File`. This way it's no longer a minor
footgun to start with an empty buffer when reading a file in.
A nice side effect of this change is that code that accesses a `File` as
a bare `Read` constraint or via a `dyn Read` trait object will benefit.
For example, this code from `compiler/rustc_serialize/src/json.rs`:
```rust
pub fn from_reader(rdr: &mut dyn Read) -> Result<Json, BuilderError> {
let mut contents = Vec::new();
match rdr.read_to_end(&mut contents) {
```
Related changes:
- I also added specializations to `BufReader` to delegate to
`self.inner`'s methods. That way it can call `File`'s optimized
implementations if the inner reader is a file.
- The private `std::io::append_to_string` function is now marked
`unsafe`.
- `File::read_to_string` being more efficient means that the performance
note for `io::read_to_string` can be softened. I've added @camelid's
suggested wording from:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80218#issuecomment-936806502
Make cfg imply doc(cfg)
This is a reopening of #79341, rebased and modified a bit (we made a lot of refactoring in rustdoc's types so they needed to be reflected in this PR as well):
* `hidden_cfg` is now in the `Cache` instead of `DocContext` because `cfg` information isn't stored anymore on `clean::Attributes` type but instead computed on-demand, so we need this information in later parts of rustdoc.
* I removed the `bool_to_options` feature (which makes the code a bit simpler to read for `SingleExt` trait implementation.
* I updated the version for the feature.
There is only one thing I couldn't figure out: [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79341#discussion_r561855624)
> I think I'll likely scrap the whole `SingleExt` extension trait as the diagnostics for 0 and >1 items should be different.
How/why should they differ?
EDIT: this part has been solved, the current code was fine, just needed a little simplification.
cc `@Nemo157`
r? `@jyn514`
Original PR description:
This is only active when the `doc_cfg` feature is active.
The implicit cfg can be overridden via `#[doc(cfg(...))]`, so e.g. to hide a `#[cfg]` you can use something like:
```rust
#[cfg(unix)]
#[doc(cfg(all()))]
pub struct Unix;
```
By adding `#![doc(cfg_hide(foobar))]` to the crate attributes the cfg `#[cfg(foobar)]` (and _only_ that _exact_ cfg) will not be implicitly treated as a `doc(cfg)` to render a message in the documentation.
Rename `std:🧵:available_conccurrency` to `std:🧵:available_parallelism`
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74479_
This PR renames `std:🧵:available_conccurrency` to `std:🧵:available_parallelism`.
## Rationale
The API was initially named `std:🧵:hardware_concurrency`, mirroring the [C++ API of the same name](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/thread/hardware_concurrency). We eventually decided to omit any reference to the word "hardware" after [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74480#issuecomment-662045841). And so we ended up with `available_concurrency` instead.
---
For a talk I was preparing this week I was reading through ["Understanding and expressing scalable concurrency" (A. Turon, 2013)](http://aturon.github.io/academic/turon-thesis.pdf), and the following passage stood out to me (emphasis mine):
> __Concurrency is a system-structuring mechanism.__ An interactive system that deals with disparate asynchronous events is naturally structured by division into concurrent threads with disparate responsibilities. Doing so creates a better fit between problem and solution, and can also decrease the average latency of the system by preventing long-running computations from obstructing quicker ones.
> __Parallelism is a resource.__ A given machine provides a certain capacity for parallelism, i.e., a bound on the number of computations it can perform simultaneously. The goal is to maximize throughput by intelligently using this resource. For interactive systems, parallelism can decrease latency as well.
_Chapter 2.1: Concurrency is not Parallelism. Page 30._
---
_"Concurrency is a system-structuring mechanism. Parallelism is a resource."_ — It feels like this accurately captures the way we should be thinking about these APIs. What this API returns is not "the amount of concurrency available to the program" which is a property of the program, and thus even with just a single thread is effectively unbounded. But instead it returns "the amount of _parallelism_ available to the program", which is a resource hard-constrained by the machine's capacity (and can be further restricted by e.g. operating systems).
That's why I'd like to propose we rename this API from `available_concurrency` to `available_parallelism`. This still meets the criteria we previously established of not attempting to define what exactly we mean by "hardware", "threads", and other such words. Instead we only talk about "concurrency" as an abstract resource available to our program.
r? `@joshtriplett`
