Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132487 (Provide placeholder generics for traits in "no method found for type parameter" suggestions)
- #132627 (cleanup: Remove outdated comment of `thir_body`)
- #132653 (Don't use `maybe_unwrap_block` when checking for macro calls in a block expr)
- #132793 (Update mdbook to 0.4.42)
- #132847 (elem_offset / subslice_range: use addr() instead of 'as usize')
- #132869 (split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries)
- #132929 (Check for null in the `alloc_zeroed` example)
- #132933 (Make sure that we suggest turbofishing the right type arg for never suggestion)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make sure that we suggest turbofishing the right type arg for never suggestion
I had a bug where rust would suggest the wrong arg to turbofish `()` if there were any early-bound lifetimes...
r? WaffleLapkin
split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries
used `./x clippy -Aclippy::all '-Wclippy::too_long_first_doc_paragraph' library/core library/alloc` to find these issues.
Update mdbook to 0.4.42
This updates mdbook to 0.4.42
Changelog: https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#mdbook-0441
There were some significant changes that I would like to get early testing on.
This also updates rust-by-example which was required due to an update to the theme file.
Don't use `maybe_unwrap_block` when checking for macro calls in a block expr
Fixes#131915
Using `maybe_unwrap_block` to determine if we are looking at a `{ mac_call!{} }` will fail sometimes as `mac_call!{}` could be a `StmtKind::MacCall` not a `StmtKind::Expr`. This caused the def collector to think that `{ mac_call!{} }` was a non-trivial const argument and create a definition for it even though it should not.
r? `@compiler-errors` cc `@camelid`
cleanup: Remove outdated comment of `thir_body`
When typeck fails, `thir_body` returns `ErrorGuaranteed` rather than empty body.
No other code follows this outdated description except `check_unsafety`, which is also cleaned up in this PR.
Provide placeholder generics for traits in "no method found for type parameter" suggestions
In the diagnostics for the error ``no method named `method` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope [E0599]``, the compiler will suggest adding bounds on `T` for traits that define a method named `method`. However, these suggestions didn't include any generic arguments, so applying them would result in a `missing generics for trait` or `missing lifetime specifier` error. This PR adds placeholder arguments to the suggestion in such cases. Specifically, I tried to base the placeholders off of what's done in suggestions for when generics are missing or too few are provided:
- The placeholder for a parameter without a default is the name of the parameter.
- Placeholders are not provided for parameters with defaults.
Placeholder arguments are enclosed in `/*` and `*/`, and the applicability of the suggestion is downgraded to `Applicability::HasPlaceholders` if any placeholders are provided.
Fixes#132407
It will be slower to build and produce larger artifacts, but hopefully
it will help catch debuginfo regressions sooner, especially for problems
that LLVM assertions would uncover.
Add a default implementation for CodegenBackend::link
As a side effect this should add raw-dylib support to cg_gcc as the default ArchiveBuilderBuilder that is used implements create_dll_import_lib. I haven't tested if the raw-dylib support actually works however.
Document some `check_expr` methods, and other misc `hir_typeck` tweaks
Most importantly, make sure that all of the expression checking functions that are called from `check_expr_kind` start with `check_expr_*`. This is super useful to me personally, since I grep these functions all the time, and the ones that *aren't* named consistently are incredibly hard to find.
Also document more of the `check_expr_*` functions, and squash two args for passing data about a call expr into one `Option`.
Arbitrary self types v2: (unused) Receiver trait
This commit contains a new `Receiver` trait, which is the basis for the Arbitrary Self Types v2 RFC. This allows smart pointers to be method receivers even if they're not Deref.
This is currently unused by the compiler - a subsequent PR will start to use this for method resolution if the `arbitrary_self_types` feature gate is enabled. This is being landed first simply to make review simpler: if people feel this should all be in an atomic PR let me know.
This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project, https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
r? `@wesleywiser`
Using "having" in both the leading sentence and the bullets is unnecessary.
It makes it read as "it is only possible to have having several immutable...".
Only copy, rename and link `llvm-objcopy` if llvm tools are enabled
Fixes#132719.
cc `@bjorn3` who reported the bootstrapping problem for cg_clif.
cc `@davidtwco` in case this might be problematic for linux -> macOS cross-compile builds, but seems very unlikely.
cc `@albertlarsan68` (co-reviewed #131405)
r? bootstrap
Remove `rustc_session::config::rustc_short_optgroups`
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132754#discussion_r1835427349.
The name `rustc_short_optgroups` has always been confusing, because it is unrelated to the distinction between short and long options (i.e. `-s` vs `--long`), and instead means something like “the subset of command-line options that are printed by `rustc --help` without `-v`”.
So let's merge that function into the main `rustc_optgroups`, and store the relevant bit of information in a boolean field in `RustcOptGroup` instead.
---
This PR also modifies `RustcOptGroup` to store its various strings directly, instead of inside a boxed `apply` closure. That turned out to not be necessary for the main change, but is a worthwhile cleanup in its own right.
Implement file_lock feature
This adds lock(), lock_shared(), try_lock(), try_lock_shared(), and unlock() to File gated behind the file_lock feature flag
This is the initial implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130994 for Unix and Windows platforms. I will follow it up with an implementation for WASI preview 2
Ensure that tail expr receive lifetime extension
cc `@jieyouxu` `@traviscross`
It just came to me that we should add a test to make sure that we honor the contract from the temporary lifetime rule #121346. We should continue to implement this rule in Edition 2021 onward and shorter tail expression lifetime should not override it.
This is a small PR to improve our assurance and establish a stronger contract.
Tracked by rust-lang/rust#123739
