interp/validity: enforce Scalar::Initialized
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94527, to also account for the new kind of `Scalar` layout inside the validity checker.
r? `@oli-obk`
When searching for how to read an environment variable, I first encountered the `env!` macro. It would have been useful to me if the documentation had included a link to `std::env::var`, which is what I was actually looking for.
enhance `ConstGoto` mir-opt by moving up `StorageDead` statements
From the `FIXME` in the implementation of `ConstGoto` miropt. We can move `StorageDead` statements up to the predecessor. This can expand the scope of application of this opt.
Suggest from_utf8_unchecked in const contexts
Unfortunately I couldn't figure out how to check whether a given expression is in an `unsafe` context or not, so I just unconditionally emit the wrapping `unsafe {}` block in the suggestion. If there is an easy way to get it to work better then I would love to hear it.
changelog: Suggest `from_utf8_unchecked` instead of `from_utf8` in const contexts for ``[`transmute_bytes_to_str`]``
refs: #8379
Fix unnecessary_cast suggestion for type aliasses
Fix#6923. The [`unnecessary_cast`] lint now will skip casting to non-primitive type.
changelog: fix lint [`unnecessary_cast `]
`indexing_slicing` should not fire if a valid array index comes from a constant function that is evaluated at compile-time
fix#8348
changelog: [`indexing_slicing`] fewer false positives in `const` contexts and with `const` indices
Update cargo
5 commits in 1ef1e0a12723ce9548d7da2b63119de9002bead8..e2e2dddebe66dfc1403a312653557e332445308b
2022-03-31 00:17:18 +0000 to 2022-04-05 17:04:53 +0000
- Part 2 of RFC2906 -- allow inheriting from a different `Cargo.toml` (rust-lang/cargo#10517)
- File Cache is valid if checkout or contents hasn't changed (rust-lang/cargo#10507)
- Fix how scrape-examples handles proc macros (rust-lang/cargo#10533)
- tools: update checkout action on CI (rust-lang/cargo#10521)
- Don't error if no binaries were installed (rust-lang/cargo#10508)
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95659 (Rely on #[link] attribute for unwind on Fuchsia.)
- #95684 (rustdoc: Fix item info display overflow)
- #95693 (interp: pass TyCtxt to Machine methods that do not take InterpCx)
- #95699 (fix: Vec leak when capacity is 0)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix: Vec leak when capacity is 0
When `RawVec::with_capacity_in` is called with capacity 0, an allocation of size 0 is allocated.
However, `<RawVec as Drop>::drop` doesn't deallocate, since it only checks if capacity was 0. Fixed by not allocating when capacity is 0.
interp: pass TyCtxt to Machine methods that do not take InterpCx
This just seems like something you might need, so let's consistently have it.
One day we might have to add `ParamEnv` as well, though that seems less likely (and in Miri you can always use `reveal_all` anyway). It might make sense to have a type that packages `TyCtxt` and `ParamEnv`, this pairing occurs quite frequently in rustc...
r? `@oli-obk`
rustdoc: Fix item info display overflow
I came across this issue when reading local `Iterator` docs (reproduced in this screenshot):
The problem comes from the fact that `span` isn't `display: block` by default. Since `item-info` was already present on `<div>` in other places, I moved the last one to `div` as well.
r? `@notriddle`
Fix unsound `File` methods
This is a draft attempt to fix#81357. *EDIT*: this PR now tackles `read()`, `write()`, `read_at()`, `write_at()` and `read_buf`. Still needs more testing though.
cc `@jstarks,` can you confirm the the Windows team is ok with the Rust stdlib using `NtReadFile` and `NtWriteFile`?
~Also, I'm provisionally using `CancelIo` in a last ditch attempt to recover but I'm not sure that this is actually a good idea. Especially as getting into this state would be a programmer error so aborting the process is justified in any case.~ *EDIT*: removed, see comments.
The current terse output gives 112 chars per line, which causes
wraparound for people using 100 char wide terminals, which is very
common.
This commit changes it to be exactly 100 wide, which makes the output
look much nicer.
Currently it's called in `parse_tt` every time a match rule is invoked.
This commit moves it so it's called instead once per match rule, in
`compile_declarative_macro. This is a performance win.
The commit also moves `compute_locs` out of `TtParser`, because there's
no longer any reason for it to be in there.
Use revisions to track NLL test output (part 1)
The idea here is 2 fold: 1) When we eventually do make NLL default on, that PR should be systematic in "delete revisions and corresponding error annotations" 2) This allows us to look at test NLL outputs in chunks. (Though, I've opted here not to "mark" these tests. There are some tests with NLL revisions *now* that will be missed. I expect we do a second pass once we have all the tests with NLL revisions; these tests should be easy enough to eyeball.)
The actual review here should be "easy", but a bit tedious. I expect we should manually go through each test output and confirm it's okay.
The majority of these are either: 1) Only span change (the one I see most common is highlighting an entire function call, rather than just the function name in that call) 2) "E0308 mismatched types" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 3) "E0495 cannot infer an appropriate lifetime for lifetime parameter" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 4) "E0312 lifetime of reference outlives lifetime of borrowed content" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 5) "E0759 `XXX` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 6) "E0623 lifetime mismatch" -> "lifetime does not live long enough"
Other than the now lack of an error code, most of these look fine (with most giving more helpful suggestions now).
`rfc1623` output isn't great.
cc ``@marmeladema`` if you want to look through these
Let's r? ``@oli-obk`` since you've commented on the Zulip thread ;)
caution against ptr-to-int transmutes
I don't know how strong of a statement we want to make here, but I am very concerned that the current docs could be interpreted as saying that ptr-to-int transmutes are just as okay as transmuting `*mut T` into an `&mut T`.
Examples [like this](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/286#issuecomment-1085144431) show that ptr-to-int transmutes are deeply suspicious -- they are either UB, or they don't round-trip properly, or we have to basically say that `transmute` will actively look for pointers and do all the things a ptr-to-int cast does (which includes a global side-effect of marking the pointed-to allocation as 'exposed').
Another alternative might be to simply not talk about them... but we *do* want people to use casts rather than transmutes for this.
Cc `@rust-lang/lang`
