Remove the `box_pointers` lint.
As the comment says, this lint "is mostly historical, and not particularly useful". It's not worth keeping it around.
r? ``@estebank``
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
The main highlight this time is support for arm64 macOS in cg_clif. A future PR will enable distributing it as rustup component.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126705 (Updated docs on `#[panic_handler]` in `library/core/src/lib.rs`)
- #126876 (Add `.ignore` file to make `config.toml` searchable in vscode)
- #126906 (Small fixme in core now that split_first has no codegen issues)
- #127023 (CI: rename Rust for Linux CI job)
- #127131 (Remove unused `rustc_trait_selection` dependencies)
- #127134 (Print `TypeId` as a `u128` for `Debug`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiler should not suggest nonsensical signatures, original suggestion was
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/lib.rs:3:31
|
3 | fn select<F, I>(filter: F) -> Select<F, I> {
| ------ ^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `Select<F, I>`, found `()`
| |
| implicitly returns `()` as its body has no tail or `return` expression
|
= note: expected struct `Select<F, I>`
found unit type `()`
error[E0282]: type annotations needed for `Select<{closure@src/lib.rs:8:22: 8:25}, I>`
--> src/lib.rs:8:9
|
8 | let lit = select(|x| match x {
| ^^^
|
help: consider giving `lit` an explicit type, where the type for type parameter `I` is specified
|
8 | let lit: Select<{closure@src/lib.rs:8:22: 8:25}, I> = select(|x| match x {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0282, E0308.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0282`.
Avoid cloning jump threading state when possible
The current implementation of jump threading passes most of its time cloning its state. This PR attempts to avoid such clones by special-casing the last predecessor when recursing through a terminator.
This is not optimal, but a first step while I refactor the state data structure to be sparse.
The two other commits are drive-by.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116721
r? `@oli-obk`
These particular callers don't actually use the returned macro information, so
they can use a simpler span-unexpansion function that doesn't return it.
The previous boolean used `true` to indicate that storage-live should _not_ be
emitted, so all occurrences of `Yes` and `No` should be the logical opposite of
the previous value.
The new enum `DeclareLetBindings` has three variants:
- `Yes`: Declare `let` bindings as normal, for `if` conditions.
- `No`: Don't declare bindings, for match guards and let-else.
- `LetNotPermitted`: Assert that `let` expressions should not occur.
Print `TypeId` as a `u128` for `Debug`
Since <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121358>, `TypeId` is represented as a `(u64, u64)`. This also made the debug implementation a lot larger, which is especially apparent with pretty formatting.
Change this to convert the inner value back to a `u128` and then print as a tuple struct to make this less noisy.
Current:
TypeId { t: (1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039) }
TypeId {
t: (
1403077013027291752,
4518903163082958039,
),
}
New:
TypeId(25882202575019293479932656973818029271)
TypeId(
25882202575019293479932656973818029271,
)
Remove unused `rustc_trait_selection` dependencies
Found using `cargo-machete`. The `bitflags` and `derivative` crates were added for the new trait solver, but weren't removed when the next trait solver code was uplifted to a separate crate.
Small fixme in core now that split_first has no codegen issues
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109328#issuecomment-1677366881
BTW, I have a crate implementing exactly this kind of an iterator: https://github.com/GrigorenkoPV/head-tail-iter and I was wondering if it would be worthwhile to try and make an ACP for it to get it included in std (or maybe itertools). My only doubt is that it kinda incentives writing O(n^2) algorithms and is not the hard to replace with a `while let` loop (just as in this PR).
Formerly the `loongarch*-*-none*` targets were added to the
`dist-various-2` CI job, but no corresponding toolchain was added along
with them. This meant the `compiler_builtins` for the targets were built
with the host toolchain.
As the other `dist-various` toolchains are mostly pre-built so far, to
avoid burdening them with crosstool-ng builds, simply move the two
bare-metal LoongArch targets to the `dist-loongarch64-linux` job which
has a ready-to-use LoongArch toolchain. With the proper CFLAGS applied
it is possible to build artifacts suitable for bare-metal. I verified
that the `compiler_builtins` objects are now correctly produced
regarding architecture and ABI, with the changes here applied.
Fixes#125908.
cc @heiher
try-job: dist-loongarch64-linux
try-job: dist-various-2
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123237 (Various rustc_codegen_ssa cleanups)
- #126960 (Improve error message in tidy)
- #127002 (Implement `x perf` as a separate tool)
- #127081 (Add a run-make test that LLD is not being used by default on the x64 beta/stable channel)
- #127106 (Improve unsafe extern blocks diagnostics)
- #127110 (Fix a error suggestion for E0121 when using placeholder _ as return types on function signature.)
- #127114 (fix: prefer `(*p).clone` to `p.clone` if the `p` is a raw pointer)
- #127118 (Show `used attribute`'s kind for user when find it isn't applied to a `static` variable.)
- #127122 (Remove uneccessary condition in `div_ceil`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Since <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121358>, `TypeId` is
represented as a `(u64, u64)`. This also made the debug implementation a
lot larger, which is especially apparent with pretty formatting.
Make this less noisy by converting the inner value back to a `u128` then
printing as a tuple struct.
Current:
TypeId { t: (1403077013027291752, 4518903163082958039) }
TypeId {
t: (
1403077013027291752,
4518903163082958039,
),
}
New:
TypeId(25882202575019293479932656973818029271)
TypeId(
25882202575019293479932656973818029271,
)
Remove uneccessary condition in `div_ceil`
Previously, `div_ceil` for unsigned integers had a `rhs > 0` for rounding. That condition however is always fulfilled, since `rhs == 0` would mean a division by zero earlier.
Show `used attribute`'s kind for user when find it isn't applied to a `static` variable.
For example :
```rust
extern "C" {
#[used] //~ ERROR attribute must be applied to a `static` variable
static FOO: i32; // show the kind of this item to help user understand why the error is reported.
}
```
fixes#126789
fix: prefer `(*p).clone` to `p.clone` if the `p` is a raw pointer
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126863
I wonder if there is a better way to solve the regression problem of this test case:
`tests/ui/borrowck/issue-20801.rs`.
It's okay to drop the dereference symbol in this scenario.
But it's not correct in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126863
```
help: consider removing the dereference here
|
5 - let inner: String = *p;
5 + let inner: String = p;
```
I haven't found out how to tell if clone pointer is allowed, i.e. no type mismatch occurs
Fix a error suggestion for E0121 when using placeholder _ as return types on function signature.
Recommit after refactoring based on comment:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126017#issuecomment-2189149361
But when changing return type's lifetime to `ReError` will affect the subsequent borrow check process and cause test11 in typeck_type_placeholder_item.rs to lost E0515 message.
```rust
fn test11(x: &usize) -> &_ {
//~^ ERROR the placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures for return types
&x //~ ERROR cannot return reference to function parameter(this E0515 msg will disappear)
}
```
fixes#125488
r? ``@pnkfelix``
Improve unsafe extern blocks diagnostics
Closes#126327
For this code:
```rust
extern {
pub fn foo();
pub safe fn bar();
}
```
We get ...
```
error: items in unadorned `extern` blocks cannot have safety qualifiers
--> test.rs:3:5
|
3 | pub safe fn bar();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: add unsafe to this `extern` block
|
1 | unsafe extern {
| ++++++
error[E0658]: `unsafe extern {}` blocks and `safe` keyword are experimental
--> test.rs:3:9
|
3 | pub safe fn bar();
| ^^^^
|
= note: see issue #123743 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123743> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
```
And then making the extern block unsafe, we get ...
```
error: extern block cannot be declared unsafe
--> test.rs:1:1
|
1 | unsafe extern {
| ^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #123743 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123743> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable
error: items in unadorned `extern` blocks cannot have safety qualifiers
--> test.rs:3:5
|
3 | pub safe fn bar();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0658]: `unsafe extern {}` blocks and `safe` keyword are experimental
--> test.rs:3:9
|
3 | pub safe fn bar();
| ^^^^
|
= note: see issue #123743 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123743> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(unsafe_extern_blocks)]` to the crate attributes to enable
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
```
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Add a run-make test that LLD is not being used by default on the x64 beta/stable channel
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126701 showed that the handling of `lld` in bootstrap is currently not ideal. While it would be nice to refactor it eventually, we should also make sure that we have a test that checks that `lld` is not used (yet!) by default on the x64 Linux stable channel.
CC ``@lqd``
r? ``@onur-ozkan``
Implement `x perf` as a separate tool
Continues work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126318, adds a CLI for running `rustc-perf` profiling commands through a new `rustc-perf-wrapper` tool. The CLI is in a separate tool to enable experimentation outside of `bootstrap`.
This is probably most of what we can do so far, I'll add support for benchmarking once `rustc-perf` gets a terminal output for comparing benchmark results.
r? ``@onur-ozkan``
Improve error message in tidy
The old error message was wrong (there is no `venv` Python package on PyPi), and we did not specify the correct Python path in the error message.
Implement new effects desugaring
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits.` Will write down notes once I have finished.
* [x] See if we want `T: Tr` to desugar into `T: Tr, T::Effects: Compat<true>`
* [x] Fix ICEs on `type Assoc: ~const Tr` and `type Assoc<T: ~const Tr>`
* [ ] add types and traits to minicore test
* [ ] update rustc-dev-guide
Fixes#119717Fixes#123664Fixes#124857Fixes#126148
