Clean up (sub)diagnostic derives
The biggest chunk of this is unifying the parsing of subdiagnostic attributes (`#[error]`, `#[suggestion(...)]`, `#[label(...)]`, etc) between `Subdiagnostic` and `Diagnostic` type attributes as well as `Diagnostic` field attributes.
It also improves a number of proc macro diagnostics.
Waiting for #101558.
Use function pointers instead of macro-unrolled loops in rustc_query_impl
By making these standalone functions, we
a) allow making them extensible in the future with a new `QueryStruct`
b) greatly decrease the amount of code in each individual function, avoiding exponential blowup in llvm
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96524. Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101173; only the last commit is relevant.
r? `@cjgillot`
* Remove the `float: right` fallback from the main header, which hasn't
been needed since IE11 support was dropped.
* Remove `in-band` from low-level headers, which hasn't been needed since
`.rightside` switched to `float: right` in
593d6d1cb1
* Remove unreachable `.in-band > code, .in-band > .code-header` CSS, since
the `in-band` class was attached to the `code-header` itself, not nested
directly below it.
* Use `rem` instead of `em` for code header margins.
* This results in a slight change in spacing around impls and item-info,
but since it makes it more consistent with the way methods are presented,
it's probably fine.
Neither require nor imply lifetime bounds on opaque type for well formedness
The actual hidden type can live arbitrarily longer than any individual lifetime and arbitrarily shorter than all but one of the lifetimes.
fixes#86218fixes#84305
This is a **breaking change** but it is a necessary soundness fix
These benches benchmark rust langauge features and not the compiler,
so they seem to be in the wrong place here. They also all take <1ns,
making them pretty useless. Looking at their git history, they just
seem to have been carried around for many, many years. This commit
ends their journey.
By making these standalone functions, we
a) allow making them extensible in the future with a new `QueryStruct`
b) greatly decrease the amount of code in each individual function, avoiding exponential blowup in llvm
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #98111 (Clarify `[T]::select_nth_unstable*` return values)
- #101431 (Look at move place's type when suggesting mutable reborrow)
- #101800 (Constify slice.split_at_mut(_unchecked))
- #101997 (Remove support for legacy PM)
- #102194 (Note the type when unable to drop values in compile time)
- #102200 (Constify Default impl's for Arrays and Tuples.)
- #102245 (Constify cmp_min_max_by.)
- #102259 (Type-annotate and simplify documentation of Option::unwrap_or_default)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This restores functionality broken by #98483. Unfortunately, it doesn't
add a test to verify this works, but in this case we notice pretty
quickly as perf uses this functionality and so reports breakage
immediately after merging.
Constify Default impl's for Arrays and Tuples.
Allows to create arrays and tuples in const Context using the ~const Default implementation of the inner type.
Remove support for legacy PM
This removes support for optimizing with LLVM's legacy pass manager, as well as the unstable `-Znew-llvm-pass-manager` option. We have been defaulting to the new PM since LLVM 13 (except for s390x that waited for 14), and LLVM 15 removed support altogether. The only place we still use the legacy PM is for writing the output file, just like `llc` does.
cc #74705
r? ``@nikic``
Constify slice.split_at_mut(_unchecked)
Tracking Issue: [Tracking Issue for const_slice_split_at_mut](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101804)
Feature gate: `#![feature(const_slice_split_at_mut)]`
Still requires const_mut_refs to be actually used, but this feature removes the need to manually re implement these functions in a user crate.
Look at move place's type when suggesting mutable reborrow
Not sure why we are looking at the use site's ty instead of the move site's ty in order to suggest reborrowing the move site, but it was suppressing a perfectly valid reborrow suggestion.
r? `@estebank` who i think touched this last in 520461f1fb, though that was quite a while ago so feel free to reassign.
Clarify `[T]::select_nth_unstable*` return values
In cases where the nth element is not unique within the slice, it is not
correct to say that the values in the returned triplet include ones for
"all elements" less/greater than that at the given index: indeed one (or
more) such values would then also contain elements equal to that at
the given index.
The text proposed here clarifies exactly what is returned, but in so
doing it is also documenting an implementation detail that previously
wasn't detailed: namely that the returned slices are slices into the
reordered slice. I don't think this can be contentious, because the
lifetimes of those returned slices are bound to that of the original
(now reordered) slice—so there really isn't any other reasonable
implementation that could have this behaviour; but nevertheless it's
probably best if `@rust-lang/libs-api` give it a nod?
Fixes#97982
r? `@m-ou-se`
`@rustbot` label +A-docs +C-bug +T-libs-api -T-libs
Don't drop parent substs when we have no generic parameters in `create_substs_for_ast_path`
This bug is being shadowed by an explicit check for `generics.params.is_empty()` in the only parent caller that could trigger it (`create_substs_for_associated_item`). I triggered it on another branch where I'm messing around with astconv stuff.
Also, the second commit simplifies `create_substs_for_associated_item`. Removing that explicit check I mentioned above^ and also the special case call to `Astconv::prohibit_generics` causes the UI test `src/test/ui/structs/struct-path-associated-type.stderr` to change, but I think that it's clearer now. The suggestion to remove the generics is actually useful.
rustdoc: remove unused CSS `#main-content > .line-numbers`
This selector was added in 10b9370286. It became unreachable when 09150f8193 made it so that `.line-numbers` are always nested below `.example-wrap`, even on source pages.
rustdoc: Stabilize --diagnostic-width
This stabilizes the `--diagnostic-width` flag for rustdoc. This flag was stabilized in rustc in #95635, but it isn't clear from the discussion there why it wasn't stabilized in rustdoc. I believe this flag works as expected, following the same behavior as rustc.
I'd like to stabilize this so that the same support can be stabilized in cargo, and it would help simplify things if both rustc and rustdoc supported it.
Resolve async fn signature even without body (e.g., in trait)
Fixes#102138
This "bail if no body" behavior was introduced in #69539 to fix#69401, but that ICE does not reproduce any more. The error message changes a bit, but that's all, and I don't think it's a particularly diagnostic bad regression.
implied_bounds: deal with inference vars
fixes#101951
while computing implied bounds for `<<T as ConstructionFirm>::Builder as BuilderFn<'_>>::Output` normalization replaces a projection with an inference var (adding a `Projection` obligation). Until we prove that obligation, this inference var remains unknown, which caused us to miss an implied bound necessary to prove that the unnormalized projection from the trait method signature is wf.
r? types
Recover error strings on Unix from_lossy_utf8
Some language settings can result in unreliable UTF-8 being produced.
This can result in failing to emit the error string, panicking instead.
from_lossy_utf8 allows us to assume these strings usually will be fine.
This fixes rust-lang#99535.
make Condvar, Mutex, RwLock const constructors work with the `unsupported` impl
applying this patch locally to the `rust-src` component fixes#98378
however, the solution seems wrong to me because PR #97791 didn't add any `rustc_const_stable` attribute to underlying implementations like `std::sys::unix::futex`, so I must be missing something about how const-stability is checked ... maybe the `restricted_std` feature (gate?) has an effect?
fixes#98378fixes#98293 (probably)
Make ZST checks in core/alloc more readable
There's a bunch of these checks because of special handing for ZSTs in various unsafe implementations of stuff.
This lets them be `T::IS_ZST` instead of `mem::size_of::<T>() == 0` every time, making them both more readable and more terse.
*Not* proposed for stabilization. Would be `pub(crate)` except `alloc` wants to use it too.
(And while it doesn't matter now, if we ever get something like #85836 making it a const can help codegen be simpler.)
