Add Apple WatchOS compile targets
Hello,
I would like to add the following target triples for Apple WatchOS as Tier 3 platforms:
armv7k-apple-watchos
arm64_32-apple-watchos
x86_64-apple-watchos-sim
There are some pre-requisites Pull Requests:
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/456 (merged)
https://github.com/alexcrichton/cc-rs/pull/662 (pending)
https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/2717 (merged)
There will be a subsequent PR with standard library changes for WatchOS. Previous compiler and library changes were in a single PR (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94736) which is now closed in favour of separate PRs.
Many thanks!
Vlad.
### Tier 3 Target Requirements
Adds support for Apple WatchOS compile targets.
Below are details on how this target meets the requirements for tier 3:
> tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
`@deg4uss3r` has volunteered to be the target maintainer. I am also happy to help if a second maintainer is required.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
Uses the same naming as the LLVM target, and the same convention as other Apple targets.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
I don't believe there is any ambiguity here.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
I don't see any legal issues here.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> If the target supports building host tools (such as rustc or cargo), those host tools must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries, other than ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other binaries built for the target. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> Targets should not require proprietary (non-FOSS) components to link a functional binary or library.
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
I see no issues with any of the above.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Only relevant to those making approval decisions.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
core and alloc can be used. std support will be added in a subsequent PR.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Use --target=<target> option to cross compile, just like any target. Tests can be run using the WatchOS simulator (see https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/running-your-app-in-the-simulator-or-on-a-device).
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
I don't foresee this being a problem.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
No other targets should be affected by the pull request.
Improve parser diagnostics
This pr fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93867 and contains a couple of diagnostics related changes to the parser.
Here is a short list with some of the changes:
- don't suggest the same thing that is the current token
- suggest removing the current token if the following token is one of the suggestions (maybe incorrect)
- tell the user to put a type or lifetime after where if there is none (as a warning)
- reduce the amount of tokens suggested (via the new eat_noexpect and check_noexpect methods)
If any of these changes are undesirable, i can remove them, thanks!
Remove unnecessary `to_string` and `String::new`
73fa217bc1 changed the type of the `suggestion` argument to `impl ToString`. This patch removes unnecessary `to_string` and `String::new`.
cc: `````@davidtwco`````
Make `type_changing_struct_update` no longer an incomplete feature
After #97705, I don't see what would make it incomplete anymore. `check_expr_struct_fields` seems to now implement the RFC to the letter.
r? ``````@nikomatsakis``````
cc ``````@rust-lang/types``````
interpret: unify offset_from check with offset check
`offset` does the check with a single `check_ptr_access` call while `offset_from` used two calls. Make them both just one one call.
I originally intended to actually factor this into a common function, but I am no longer sure if that makes a lot of sense... the two functions start with pretty different precondition (e.g. `offset` *knows* that the 2nd pointer has the same provenance).
I also reworded the UB messages a little. Saying it "cannot" do something is not how we usually phrase UB (as far as I know). Instead it's not *allowed* to do that.
r? ``````@oli-obk``````
Use safer `strip=symbols`-flag for dylibs on macOS
Closes#93988
To safely strip dylibs on macOS, the `-x` flag is needed per the manpage (see the discussion here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93988#issuecomment-1042574854).
Thus, when the current `crate_type` is producing a dylib (I assume this is the case for proc macros) use the `-x` flag instead of bare `strip` for `strip=symbols`.
Tidy up miscellaneous bounds suggestions
Just some small fixes to suggestions
- Generalizes `Ty::is_suggestable` into a `TypeVisitor`, so that it can be called on things other than `Ty`
- Makes `impl Trait` in arg position no longer suggestible (generalizing the fix in #97640)
- Fixes `impl Trait` not being replaced with fresh type param when it's deeply nested in function signature (fixes#97760)
- Fixes some poor handling of `where` clauses with no predicates (also #97760)
- Uses `InferCtxt::resolve_numeric_literals_with_default` so we suggest `i32` instead of `{integer}` (fixes#97677)
Sorry there aren't many tests the fixes. Most of them would just be duplicates of other tests with empty `where` clauses or `impl Trait` in arg position instead of generic params. Let me know if you'd want more test coverage.
Fix inference issues with unconstrained base expr in `type_changing_struct_update`
Use fresh infer vars to guide inference along in `type_changing_struct_update`.
Fixes#96878
Handle `def_ident_span` like `def_span`.
`def_ident_span` had an ad-hoc status in the compiler.
This PR refactors it to be a first-class citizen like `def_span`:
- it gets encoded in the main metadata loop, instead of the visitor;
- its implementation is updated to mirror the one of `def_span`.
We do not remove the `Option` in the return type, since some items do not have an ident, AnonConsts for instance.
Make -Cpasses= only apply to pre-link optimization
This change causes passes specified in -Cpasses= to be applied
only during pre-link optimization, not during LTO. This avoids
such passes running multiple times, which they may not be
designed for.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97713
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97761 (validating the vtable can lead to Stacked Borrows errors)
- #97789 (Fix#71363's test by adding `-Z translate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no`)
- #97913 (Wrap `HirId`s of locals into `LocalVarId`s for THIR nodes)
- #97979 (Fix typos in Provider API docs)
- #97987 (remove an unnecessary `String`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Wrap `HirId`s of locals into `LocalVarId`s for THIR nodes
This is the first effort to decouple `HirId`s from THIR. `HirId` is not very relevant in building THIR and MIR.
Based on the changeset, I think there are a few other pending refactoring that we could perform after this, in case we want to eliminate use of `HirId` in THIR.
- `TypeckResults::closure_min_captures` could be remapped from the variable `HirId`s to `LocalVarId` while the THIR is getting built.
- Use of `ScopeTree::var_scope` could be eliminated as well, since we will consider deprecating `ScopeTree` in the future.
Fix#71363's test by adding `-Z translate-remapped-path-to-local-path=no`
The test relies on `library/std/src/error.rs` not corresponding to a local path, but remapping might still find the related local file of a remapped path. To fix the test, this PR adds a new `-Z` flag to disable finding the corresponding local path of a remapped path.
Never regard macro rules with compile_error! invocations as unused
The very point of compile_error! is to never be reached, and one of
the use cases of the macro, currently also listed as examples in the
documentation of compile_error, is to create nicer errors for wrong
macro invocations. Thus, we should never warn about unused macro arms
that contain invocations of compile_error.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96150#issuecomment-1126599107 and the discussion after that.
Furthermore, the PR also contains two commits to silence `unused_macro_rules` when a macro has an invalid rule, and to add a test that `unused_macros` does not behave badly in the same situation.
r? `@petrochenkov` as I've talked to them about this
