Uplift `clippy::cmp_nan` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::cmp_nan` lint into rustc.
## `invalid_nan_comparisons`
~~(deny-by-default)~~ (warn-by-default)
The `invalid_nan_comparisons` lint checks comparison with `f32::NAN` or `f64::NAN` as one of the operand.
### Example
```rust,compile_fail
let a = 2.3f32;
if a == f32::NAN {}
```
### Explanation
NaN does not compare meaningfully to anything – not even itself – so those comparisons are always false.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #112260 (Improve document of `unsafe_code` lint)
- #112429 ([rustdoc] List matching impls on type aliases)
- #112442 (Deduplicate identical region constraints in new solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Uplift `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` lint.
## `undropped_manually_drops`
(warn-by-default)
The `undropped_manually_drops` lint check for calls to `std::mem::drop` with a value of `std::mem::ManuallyDrop` which doesn't drop.
### Example
```rust
struct S;
drop(std::mem::ManuallyDrop::new(S));
```
### Explanation
`ManuallyDrop` does not drop it's inner value so calling `std::mem::drop` will not drop the inner value of the `ManuallyDrop` either.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting an clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
`@rustbot` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::undropped_manually_drops` into rustc
Extra context for unreachable_pub lint
While experienced Rustaceans no doubt know this sort of thing already, as more of a newbie I had trouble understanding why I was triggering the lint. Hopefully this expanded explanation saves someone else some head-scratching.
Fixes#110922
Uplift `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` lint into two lints.
## `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked`
(deny-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8_unchecked` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
unsafe {
std::str::from_utf8_unchecked(b"cl\x82ippy");
}
```
### Explanation
Creating such a `str` would result in undefined behavior as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked` and `std::str::from_utf8_unchecked_mut`.
## `invalid_from_utf8`
(warn-by-default)
The `invalid_from_utf8` lint checks for calls to `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut` with an invalid UTF-8 literal.
### Example
```rust
std::str::from_utf8(b"ru\x82st");
```
### Explanation
Trying to create such a `str` would always return an error as per documentation for `std::str::from_utf8` and `std::str::from_utf8_mut`.
-----
Mostly followed the instructions for uplifting a clippy lint described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
````@rustbot```` label: +I-lang-nominated
r? compiler
-----
For Clippy:
changelog: Moves: Uplifted `clippy::invalid_utf8_in_unchecked` into rustc
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
Add warn-by-default lint when local binding shadows exported glob re-export item
This PR introduces a warn-by-default rustc lint for when a local binding (a use statement, or a type declaration) produces a name which shadows an exported glob re-export item, causing the name from the exported glob re-export to be hidden (see #111336).
### Unresolved Questions
- [x] ~~Is this approach correct? While it passes the UI tests, I'm not entirely convinced it is correct.~~ Seems to be ok now.
- [x] ~~What should the lint be called / how should it be worded? I don't like calling `use x::*;` or `struct Foo;` a "local binding" but they are `NameBinding`s internally if I'm not mistaken.~~ ~~The lint is called `local_binding_shadows_glob_reexport` for now, unless a better name is suggested.~~ `hidden_glob_reexports`.
Fixes#111336.
Ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order
Fixes#111847
This adds a tidy check to ensure Fluent messages are in alphabetical order, as well as sorting all existing messages. I think the error could be worded better, would appreciate suggestions.
<details>
<summary>Script used to sort files</summary>
```py
import sys
import re
fn = sys.argv[1]
with open(fn, 'r') as f:
data = f.read().split("\n")
chunks = []
cur = ""
for line in data:
if re.match(r"^([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\s*=\s*", line):
chunks.append(cur)
cur = ""
cur += line + "\n"
chunks.append(cur)
chunks.sort()
with open(fn, 'w') as f:
f.write(''.join(chunks).strip("\n\n") + "\n")
```
</details>
Consider lint check attributes on match arms
Currently, lint check attributes on match arms have no effect for some lints. This PR makes some lint passes to take those attributes into account.
- `LateContextAndPass` for late lint doesn't update `last_node_with_lint_attrs` when it visits match arms. This leads to lint check attributes on match arms taking no effects on late lints that operate on the arms' pattern:
```rust
match value {
#[deny(non_snake_case)]
PAT => {} // `non_snake_case` only warned due to default lint level
}
```
To be honest, I'm not sure whether this is intentional or just an oversight. I've dug the implementation history and searched up issues/PRs but couldn't find any discussion on this.
- `MatchVisitor` doesn't update its lint level when it visits match arms. This leads to check lint attributes on match arms taking no effect on some lints handled by this visitor, namely: `bindings_with_variant_name` and `irrefutable_let_patterns`.
This seems to be a fallout from #108504. Before 05082f57af, when the visitor operated on HIR rather than THIR, check lint attributes for the said lints were effective. [This playground][play] compiles successfully on current stable (1.69) but fails on current beta and nightly.
I wasn't sure where best to place the test for this. Let me know if there's a better place.
[play]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=38432b79e535cb175f8f7d6d236d29c3
[play-match]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=beta&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=629aa71b7c84b269beadeba664e2221d
Dont check `must_use` on nested `impl Future` from fn
Fixes (but does not close, per beta policy) #111484
Also fixes a `FIXME` left in the code about (presumably) false-positives on non-async `#[must_use] fn() -> impl Future` cases, though if that's not desirable to include in the beta backport then I can certainly revert it.
Beta nominating as it fixes a beta ICE.
Document that `missing_copy_implementations` and `missing_debug_implementations` only apply to public items.
I encountered #111359 (fixed) and noticed that the documentation didn't say that it was _intended_ that `missing_debug_implementations` only applies to public items. This PR fixes that, and makes the same wording change to `missing_copy_implementations` which has the same condition.
I chose the words to also be similar to `missing_docs` which already had such a remark.
Introduce `DynSend` and `DynSync` auto trait for parallel compiler
part of parallel-rustc #101566
This PR introduces `DynSend / DynSync` trait and `FromDyn / IntoDyn` structure in rustc_data_structure::marker. `FromDyn` can dynamically check data structures for thread safety when switching to parallel environments (such as calling `par_for_each_in`). This happens only when `-Z threads > 1` so it doesn't affect single-threaded mode's compile efficiency.
r? `@cjgillot`
Uplift `clippy::{drop,forget}_{ref,copy}` lints
This PR aims at uplifting the `clippy::drop_ref`, `clippy::drop_copy`, `clippy::forget_ref` and `clippy::forget_copy` lints.
Those lints are/were declared in the correctness category of clippy because they lint on useless and most probably is not what the developer wanted.
## `drop_ref` and `forget_ref`
The `drop_ref` and `forget_ref` lint checks for calls to `std::mem::drop` or `std::mem::forget` with a reference instead of an owned value.
### Example
```rust
let mut lock_guard = mutex.lock();
std::mem::drop(&lock_guard) // Should have been drop(lock_guard), mutex
// still locked
operation_that_requires_mutex_to_be_unlocked();
```
### Explanation
Calling `drop` or `forget` on a reference will only drop the reference itself, which is a no-op. It will not call the `drop` or `forget` method on the underlying referenced value, which is likely what was intended.
## `drop_copy` and `forget_copy`
The `drop_copy` and `forget_copy` lint checks for calls to `std::mem::forget` or `std::mem::drop` with a value that derives the Copy trait.
### Example
```rust
let x: i32 = 42; // i32 implements Copy
std::mem::forget(x) // A copy of x is passed to the function, leaving the
// original unaffected
```
### Explanation
Calling `std::mem::forget` [does nothing for types that implement Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.drop.html) since the value will be copied and moved into the function on invocation.
-----
Followed the instructions for uplift a clippy describe here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99696#pullrequestreview-1134072751
cc `@m-ou-se` (as T-libs-api leader because the uplifting was discussed in a recent meeting)
While experienced Rustaceans no doubt know this sort of thing already, as more of a newbie I had trouble understanding why I was triggering the lint.
Hopefully this expanded explanation saves someone else some head-scratching.
Introduce `AliasKind::Inherent` for inherent associated types
Allows us to check (possibly generic) inherent associated types for well-formedness.
Type inference now also works properly.
Follow-up to #105961. Supersedes #108430.
Fixes#106722.
Fixes#108957.
Fixes#109768.
Fixes#109789.
Fixes#109790.
~Not to be merged before #108860 (`AliasKind::Weak`).~
CC `@jackh726`
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@rustbot` label T-types F-inherent_associated_types
