Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
Accept `TyCtxt` instead of `TyCtxtAt` in `Ty::is_*` functions
Functions in answer:
- `Ty::is_freeze`
- `Ty::is_sized`
- `Ty::is_unpin`
- `Ty::is_copy_modulo_regions`
This allows to remove a lot of useless `.at(DUMMY_SP)`, making the code a bit nicer :3
r? `@compiler-errors`
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
Fix wrapped valid-range handling in ty_find_init_error
Rust's niche handling allows for wrapping valid ranges with end < start;
for instance, a valid range with start=43 and end=41 means a niche of
42. Most places in the compiler handle this correctly, but
`ty_find_init_error` assumed that `lo > 0` means the type cannot contain a
zero.
Fix it to handle wrapping ranges.
Flatten diagnostic slug modules
This makes it easier to grep for the slugs in the code.
See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Localization.20infra.20interferes.20with.20grepping.20for.20error for more discussion about it.
This was mostly done with a few regexes and a bunch of manual work. This also exposes a pretty annoying inconsistency for the extra labels. Some of the extra labels are defined as additional properties in the fluent message (which makes them not prefixed with the crate name) and some of them are new fluent messages themselves (which makes them prefixed with the crate name). I don't know whether we want to clean this up at some point but it's useful to know.
r? `@davidtwco`
Change `unknown_lint` applicability to `MaybeIncorrect`
This small PR changes the applicability of `unknown_lint` to `MaybeIncorrect`, because the suggested lint might not be the correct one.
Here is one example where the current applicability causes a problem. Clippy has a set of internal lints guarded by a feature called `internal`. If the feature is not enabled, then the internal lints are "unknown." In that case, running `cargo clippy --fix ...` on `clippy_utils` causes lines such as the followig
26c96e3416/src/tools/clippy/clippy_utils/src/paths.rs (L51-L52)
to be changed to
```rust
#[expect(clippy::invalid_regex)] // internal lints do not know about all external crates
pub const FUTURES_IO_ASYNCREADEXT: [&str; 3] = ["futures_util", "io", "AsyncReadExt"];
```
which is not correct.
Introduce `subst_iter` and `subst_iter_copied` on `EarlyBinder`
Makes working with bounds lists a bit easier, which I seem to do a lot.
Specifically, means that we don't need to do `.transpose_iter().map(|(pred, _)| *pred)` every time we want to iterate through an `EarlyBinder<&'tcx [(Predicate, Span)]>` (and even then, still have to call `subst` later), which was a very awkward idiom imo.
Rust's niche handling allows for wrapping valid ranges with end < start;
for instance, a valid range with start=43 and end=41 means a niche of
42. Most places in the compiler handle this correctly, but
ty_find_init_error assumed that `lo > 0` means the type cannot contain a
zero.
Fix it to handle wrapping ranges.
Add a test to cover this case.
Slightly tweak comments wrt `lint_overflowing_range_endpoint`
From the review: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101986#discussion_r975610611
It _seemed_ that the lint was not emitted when the `if` check failed, but _actually_ this happens already in a special case and the lint is emitted outside of this function, if this function doesn't. I've cleared up the code/comments a bit, so it's more obvious :)
r? ```@estebank```
translation: doc comments with derives, subdiagnostic-less enum variants, more derive use
- Adds support for `doc` attributes in the diagnostic derives so that documentation comments don't result in the derive failing.
- Adds support for enum variants in the subdiagnostic derive to not actually correspond to an addition to a diagnostic.
- Made use of the derive in more places in the `rustc_ast_lowering`, `rustc_ast_passes`, `rustc_lint`, `rustc_session`, `rustc_infer` - taking advantage of recent additions like eager subdiagnostics, multispan suggestions, etc.
cc #100717
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with` is similar to the previous
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic` but takes a function that can be
used by the caller to modify diagnostic messages originating from the
subdiagnostic (such as performing translation eagerly).
`add_to_diagnostic` now just calls `add_to_diagnostic_with` with an
empty closure.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
I refactored the code:
- Removed handling of methods, as it felt entirely unnecessary
- Removed clippy utils (obviously...)
- Used some shiny compiler features
(let-else is very handy for lints 👀)
- I also renamed the lint to `for_loop_over_fallibles` (note: no `s`).
I'm not sure what's the naming convention here, so maybe I'm wrong.
