Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`)
- #100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck)
- #101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`)
- #101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`)
- #101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information)
- #101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature)
- #101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook)
- #101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`)
- #101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert let_chains stabilization
This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
Bumps the stage0 compiler which already has it reverted.
Remove separate indexing of early-bound regions
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99728.~
This PR copies some modifications from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97839 around object lifetime defaults.
These modifications allow to stop counting generic parameters during lifetime resolution, and rely on the indexing given by `rustc_typeck::collect`.
sugg: suggest the usage of boolean value when there is a typo in the keyword
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100686
This adds a new suggestion when there is a well-known typo
With the following program
```rust
fn main() {
let x = True;
}
```
Now we have the following suggestion
```
error[E0425]: cannot find value `True` in this scope
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let x = True;
| ^^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: you may want to use a bool value instead
|
2 | let x = true;
| ~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Use `&mut Diagnostic` instead of `&mut DiagnosticBuilder` unless needed
This seems to be the established convention (02ff9e0) when `DiagnosticBuilder` was first added. I am guilty of introducing some of these.
Don't ICE while suggesting updating item path.
When an item isn't found, we may suggest an appropriate import to `use`. Along with that, we also suggest updating the path to work with the `use`. Unfortunately, if the code in question originates from a macro, the span used to indicate which part of the path needs updating may not be suitable and cause an ICE (*). Since, such code is not adjustable directly by the user without modifying the macro, just skip the suggestion in such cases.
(*) The ICE happens because the emitter want to indicate to the user what code to delete by referencing a certain span. But in this case, said span has `lo == hi == 0` which means it thinks it's a dummy span. Adding a space before the proc macro attribute is enough to stop it from ICE'ing but even then the suggestion doesn't really make any sense:
```
help: if you import `DataStore`, refer to it directly
|
1 - #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
1 + #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
```
Since suggestions are best-effort, I just gated this one on `can_be_used_for_suggestions` which catches cases like this.
Fixes#100199
When an item isn't found, we may suggest an appropriate import to
`use`. Along with that, we also suggest updating the path to work
with the `use`. Unfortunately, if the code in question originates
from a macro, the span used to indicate which part of the path
needs updating may not be suitable and cause an ICE. Since, such
code is not adjustable directly by the user without modifying the
macro, just skip the suggestion in such cases.
Always create elided lifetimes, even if inferred.
`PathSource` gives the context in which a path is encountered. The same `PathSource` is used for the full path and the `QSelf` part.
Therefore, we can only rely on `PathSource` to know whether typechecking will be able to infer the lifetimes, not whether we need to insert them at all.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99949
