Allow escaping bound vars during `normalize_erasing_regions` in new solver
Add `AllowEscapingBoundVars` to `deeply_normalize`, and use it in the new solver in the `query_normalize` routine.
Ideally, we'd make all `query_normalize` calls handle pass in `AllowEscapingBoundVars` individually, because really the only `query_normalize` call that needs `AllowEscapingBoundVars::Yes` is the one in `try_normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions`, but I think that's kind of overkill. I am happy to be convinced otherwise, though.
r? `@lcnr`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113599 (Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions)
- #113662 (Rename VecDeque's `rotate_left` and `rotate_right` parameters)
- #113681 (rustdoc-json: Add test for private supertrait.)
- #113682 (trait system refactor ping: also apply to nested modules of `solve`)
- #113685 (Print artifact sizes in `opt-dist`)
- #113688 (llvm-wrapper: update for LLVM API change)
- #113692 (tests: adapt for removal of -opaque-pointers in LLVM 17)
- #113698 (Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT)
- #113699 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
- #113625 (Structurally normalize in selection)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make it clearer that we're just checking for an RPITIT
Tiny nit to use `is_impl_trait_in_trait` more, to make it clearer that we're just checking whether a def-id is an RPITIT, rather than doing something meaningful with the `opt_rpitit_info`.
r? `@spastorino`
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
refactor(rustc_middle): Substs -> GenericArg
resolves#110793
- [x] rename `SubstsRef` and `InternalSubsts` to `GenericArgsRef<'tcx>` and `GenericArgs<'tcx>`.
- [x] rename variables and fields currently using `substs` to `args`.
- [x] update the module name of `ty::subst` to `ty::generic_args` or sth. Make that module private and publicly reexport its content in the ty module.
- [x] rename `EarlyBinder::subst(_identity)` to `EarlyBinder::instantiate(_identity)`.
- [x] types called `[a-zA-Z]+Substs` renamed to `XArgs`.
- [x] functions containing `substs` now use `args` or `generic_args` (mostly the former).
However, the verb of "substituting" is still being used here and there, mostly in comments. I think that can be a separate PR as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110254 to change the verb to `replace_generics` or something similar.
bootstrap: update defaults for `compiler` and `library` aliases
* `x doc compiler` now documents all of compiler, not just `rustc_driver`.
* `x doc` with compiler docs enabled now includes `rustc-main` and `rustc_smir`. `rustc_codegen_llvm` is only included if the LLVM backend is enabled, which is the default.
* `x doc library` now excludes `sysroot`.
* `x check compiler` and `x check library` now properly check tests/benches/examples of all compiler or library crates, respectively. Note that `x check compiler` will check the library artifacts, but not tests.
fixes the fallout from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111955, cc `@jyn514`
Enable potential_query_instability lint in rustc_hir_typeck.
Fix linting errors by using `FxIndex(Map|Set)` and `Unord(Map|Set)` as appropriate. Part of [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
I really like the `potential_query_instability` lint!
r? `@lcnr`
Add a cache for `maybe_lint_level_root_bounded`
`maybe_lint_level_root_bounded` is called many times and traces node sub-paths many times. This PR adds a cache that lets many of these tracings be skipped, avoiding lots of calls to functions like `Map::attrs` and `Map::parent_id`.
r? `@cjgillot`
make MCP510 behavior opt-in to avoid conflicts between the CLI and target flavors
Fixes#113597, which contains more details on how this happens through the code, and showcases an unexpected `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor.
#112910 added support to use `lld` when the flavor requests it, but didn't explicitly do so only when using `-Clink-self-contained=+linker` or one of the unstable `-Clinker-flavor`s.
The problem: some targets have a `lld` linker and flavor, e.g. `thumbv6m-none-eabi` from that issue. Users can override the linker but there are no linker flavors precise enough to describe the linker opting out of lld: when using `-Clinker=arm-none-eabi-gcc`, we infer this is a `Cc::Yes` linker flavor, but the `lld` component is unknown and therefore defaulted to the target's linker flavor, `Lld::Yes`.
<details>
<summary>Walkthrough of how this happens</summary>
The linker flavor used is a mix between what can be inferred from the CLI (`-C linker`) and the target's default linker flavor:
- there is no linker flavor on the CLI (and that also offers another workaround on nightly: `-C linker-flavor=gnu-cc -Zunstable-options`), so it will have to be inferred [from here](5dac6b320b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs (L1334-L1336)) to [here](5dac6b320b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/link.rs (L1321-L1327)).
- in [`infer_linker_hints`](5dac6b320b/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/mod.rs (L320-L352)) `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc` infers a `Some(Cc::Yes)` cc hint, and no hint about lld.
- the target's `linker_flavor` is combined in `with_cli_hints` with these hints. We have our `Cc::Yes`, but there is no hint about lld, [so the target's flavor `lld` component is used](5dac6b320b/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/mod.rs (L356-L358)). It's [`Gnu(Cc::No, Lld::Yes)`](993deaa0bf/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/thumb_base.rs (L35)).
- so we now have our `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor
</details>
This results in a `Gnu(Cc::Yes, Lld::Yes)` flavor on a non-lld linker, causing an additional unexpected `-fuse-ld=lld` argument to be passed.
I don't know if this target defaulting to `rust-lld` is expected, but until MCP510's new linker flavor are stable, when people will be able to describe their linker/flavor accurately, this PR keeps the stable behavior of not doing anything when the linker/flavor on the CLI unexpectedly conflict with the target's.
I've tested this on a `no_std` `-C linker=arm-none-eabi-gcc -C link-arg=-nostartfiles --target thumbv6m-none-eabi` example, trying to simulate one of `cortex-m`'s test mentioned in issue #113597 (I don't know how to build a local complete `thumbv6m-none-eabi` toolchain to run the exact test), and checked that `-fuse-lld` was indeed gone and the error disappeared.
r? `````@petrochenkov`````
refactor proof tree formatting
mostly:
- handle indentation via a separate formatter
- change nested to use a closure
tested it after rebasing on top of #113536 and everything looks good.
r? `````@BoxyUwU`````
Make Placeholder, GeneratorWitness*, Infer and Error unreachable on SMIR rustc_ty_to_ty
Let's remove these todos to not confuse ``@ericmarkmartin`` if they pick some conversion up.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Implement selection for `Unsize` for better coercion behavior
In order for much of coercion to succeed, we need to be able to deal with partial ambiguity of `Unsize` traits during selection. However, I pessimistically implemented selection in the new trait solver to just bail out with ambiguity if it was a built-in impl:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs (L126)
This implements a proper "rematch" procedure for dealing with built-in `Unsize` goals, so that even if the goal is ambiguous, we are able to get nested obligations which are used in the coercion selection-like loop:
9227ff28af/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/coercion.rs (L702)
Second commit just moves a `resolve_vars_if_possible` call to fix a bug where we weren't detecting a trait upcasting to occur.
r? ``@lcnr``
(re-)tighten sourceinfo span of adjustments in MIR
Diagnostics rely on the spans of MIR statements being (approximately) correct in order to give suggestions relative to that span (i.e. `shrink_to_hi` and `shrink_to_lo`).
I discovered that we're *intentionally* lowering THIR exprs with their parent expr's span if they come from adjustments that are due to a parent expression. While I understand why that may be desirable to demonstrate the relationship of an adjustment and the expression that requires it, it leads to
1. very verbose borrowck output
2. incorrect spans for suggestions
Some diagnostics get around that by giving suggestions relative to other spans we've collected during MIR lowering, such as the span of the method's identifier (e.g. `name` in `.name()`), but this doesn't work too well when things come from desugaring.
I assume it also has lead to numerous tweaks and complications to diagnostics code down the road, which this PR doesn't necessarily aim to fix but may open the gates to fixing later... The last three commits are simplifications due to the fact that we can assume that the move span actually points to what is being moved (and a test).
This regressed in #89110, which was debated somewhat in #90286. cc `@Aaron1011` who originally made this change.
r? diagnostics
Fixes#113547Fixes#111016
miri: protect Move() function arguments during the call
This gives `Move` operands a meaning specific to function calls:
- for the duration of the call, the place the operand comes from is protected, making all read and write accesses insta-UB.
- the contents of that place are reset to `Uninit`, so looking at them again after the function returns, we cannot observe their contents
Turns out we can replace the existing "retag return place" hack with the exact same sort of protection on the return place, which is nicely symmetric.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112564
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2927
This starts with a Miri rustc-push, since we'd otherwise conflict with a PR that recently landed in Miri.
(The "miri tree borrows" commit is an unrelated cleanup I noticed while doing the PR. I can remove it if you prefer.)
r? `@oli-obk`
