It currently has two, which don't accurately capture what's happening --
the `TupleStruct` spans are allocated in `ResolverArenas`, which is
different to where the `Expr` is allocated -- and require some
"outlives" constraints to be used.
This commit adds another lifetime, renames the existing ones, and
removes the "outlives" constraints.
Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute
```
error: cannot find attribute `sede` in this scope
--> $DIR/missing-derive-2.rs:22:7
|
LL | #[sede(untagged)]
| ^^^^
|
help: the derive macros `Deserialize` and `Serialize` accept the similarly named `serde` attribute
|
LL | #[serde(untagged)]
| +
error: cannot find attribute `serde` in this scope
--> $DIR/missing-derive-2.rs:16:7
|
LL | #[serde(untagged)]
| ^^^^^
|
note: `serde` is imported here, but it is a crate, not an attribute
--> $DIR/missing-derive-2.rs:5:1
|
LL | extern crate serde;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: `serde` is an attribute that can be used by the derive macros `Serialize` and `Deserialize`, you might be missing a `derive` attribute
|
LL + #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)]
LL | enum B {
|
```
Partially address #47608. This PR doesn't find [macros that haven't yet been imported by name](af945cb86e).
Tracking the old name of renamed unstable library features
This PR resolves the first problem of rust-lang/rust#141617 : tracking renamed unstable features. The first commit is to add a ui test, and the second one tracks the changes. I will comment on the code for clarification.
r? `@jdonszelmann`
There have been a lot of PR's reviewed by you lately, thanks for your time!
cc `@jyn514`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#134536 (Lint on fn pointers comparisons in external macros)
- rust-lang/rust#141069 (Suggest mut when possbile for temporary value dropped while borrowed)
- rust-lang/rust#141934 (resolve: Tweak `private_macro_use` lint to be compatible with upcoming macro prelude changes)
- rust-lang/rust#142034 (Detect method not being present that is present in other tuple types)
- rust-lang/rust#142402 (chore(doctest): Remove redundant blank lines)
- rust-lang/rust#142406 (Note when enum variants shadow an associated function)
- rust-lang/rust#142407 (Remove bootstrap adhoc group)
- rust-lang/rust#142408 (Add myself (WaffleLapkin) to review rotation)
- rust-lang/rust#142418 (Remove lower_arg_ty as all callers were passing `None`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
```
error: cannot find attribute `empty_helper` in this scope
--> $DIR/derive-helper-legacy-limits.rs:17:3
|
LL | #[empty_helper]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: `empty_helper` is an attribute that can be used by the derive macro `Empty`, you might be missing a `derive` attribute
|
LL + #[derive(Empty)]
LL | struct S2;
|
```
Look at proc-macro attributes when encountering unknown attribute
```
error: cannot find attribute `sede` in this scope
--> src/main.rs:18:7
|
18 | #[sede(untagged)]
| ^^^^
|
help: the derive macros `Serialize` and `Deserialize` accept the similarly named `serde` attribute
|
18 | #[serde(untagged)]
| ~~~~~
error: cannot find attribute `serde` in this scope
--> src/main.rs:12:7
|
12 | #[serde(untagged)]
| ^^^^^
|
= note: `serde` is in scope, but it is a crate, not an attribute
help: `serde` is an attribute that can be used by the derive macros `Serialize` and `Deserialize`, you might be missing a `derive` attribute
|
10 | #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)]
|
```
resolve: Tweak `private_macro_use` lint to be compatible with upcoming macro prelude changes
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139493.
Zulip thread requesting help - [#t-compiler/help > Help requested for effects of #139493](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Help.20requested.20for.20effects.20of.20.23139493/with/514653911).
This PR by itself shouldn't cause any observable changes, its only observable effect is that the prelude changes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139493 will no longer cause regressions in tests like `tests/ui/imports/issue-119369.rs` or `tests/ui/extern/issue-80074.rs`.
This is achieved by moving the "is this thing in stdlib prelude" check from an early point (`fn process_macro_use_imports`) to a later point (`fn record_use_inner`), at which the stdlib prelude is already populated and can be inspected.
(The `is_builtin_macro` check is subsumed by the stdlib prelude check, all built-in macros go through the stdlib prelude anyway.)
rustc_resolve: Improve `resolve_const_param_in_non_trivial_anon_const` wording
In some contexts, const expressions are OK. Add a `here` to the error message to clarify this.
Closesrust-lang/rust#79429 which has 15 x 👍
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141554 (Improve documentation for codegen options)
- rust-lang/rust#141817 (rustc_llvm: add Windows system libs only when cross-compiling from Wi…)
- rust-lang/rust#141843 (Add `visit_id` to ast `Visitor`)
- rust-lang/rust#141881 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
- rust-lang/rust#141898 ([rustdoc-json] Implement PartialOrd and Ord for rustdoc_types::Id)
- rust-lang/rust#141921 (Disable f64 minimum/maximum tests for arm 32)
- rust-lang/rust#141930 (Enable triagebot `[concern]` functionality)
- rust-lang/rust#141936 (Decouple "reporting in deps" from `FutureIncompatibilityReason`)
- rust-lang/rust#141949 (move `test-float-parse` tool into `src/tools` dir)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `visit_id` to ast `Visitor`
This helps with efforts to deduplicate the `MutVisitor` and the `Visitor` code. All users of `Visitor`'s methods that have extra `NodeId` as parameters really just want to visit the id on its own.
Also includes some methods deduplicated and cleaned up as a result of this change.
r? oli-obk
Don't declare variables in `ExprKind::Let` in invalid positions
Handle `let` expressions in invalid positions specially during resolve in order to avoid making destructuring-assignment expressions that reference (invalid) variables that have not yet been delcared yet.
See further explanation in test and comment in the source.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141844
`UsePath` contains a `SmallVec<[Res; 3]>`. This holds up to three `Res`
results, one per namespace (type, value, or macro). `lower_import_res`
takes a `PerNS<Option<Res<NodeId>>>` result and lowers it into the
`SmallVec`. This is pretty weird. The input `PerNS` makes it clear which
`Res` belongs to which namespace, but the `SmallVec` throws that
information away.
And code that operates on the `SmallVec` tends to use iteration (or even
just grabbing the first entry!) without knowing which namespace the
`Res` belongs to. Even weirder! Also, `SmallVec` is an overly flexible
type to use here, because it can contain any number of elements (even
though it's optimized for 3 in this case).
This commit changes `UsePath` so it also contains a
`PerNS<Option<Res<HirId>>>`. This type preserves more information and is
more self-documenting. The commit also changes a lot of the use sites to
access the result for a particular namespace. E.g. if you're looking up
a trait, it will be in the `Res` for the type namespace if it's present;
it's silly to look in the `Res` for the value namespace or macro
namespace. Overall I find the new code much easier to understand.
However, some use sites still iterate. These now use `present_items`
because that filters out the `None` results.
Also, `redundant_pub_crate.rs` gets a bigger change. A
`UseKind:ListStem` item gets no `Res` results, which means the old `all`
call in `is_not_macro_export` would succeed (because `all` succeeds on
an empty iterator) and the `ListStem` would be ignored. This is what we
want, but was more by luck than design. The new code detects `ListStem`
explicitly. The commit generalizes the name of that function
accordingly.
Finally, the commit also removes the `use_path` arena, because
`PerNS<Option<Res>>` impls `Copy` (unlike `SmallVec`) and it can be
allocated in the arena shared by all `Copy` types.
source_span_for_markdown_range: fix utf8 violation
it is non-trivial to reproduce this bug through rustdoc, which uses this function less than clippy, so the regression test was added as a unit test instead of an integration test.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141665
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats
For patterns the old diagnostic was just incorrect, but I also added machine applicable suggestions.
For context, this special cases errors for `<T as Trait>::Assoc(..)` patterns and expressions (latter is just a call). Tuple struct patterns and expressions both live in the value namespace, so they are not forwarded through associated *types*.
r? ``@jdonszelmann``
cc ``@petrochenkov`` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80080#issuecomment-800630582 you were wondering why it doesn't work for types, that's why — tuple patterns are resolved in the value namespace.
This helps with efforts to deduplicate the `MutVisitor` and the
`Visitor` code. All users of `Visitor`'s methods that have extra
`NodeId` as parameters really just want to visit the id on its
own.
Also includes some methods deduplicated and cleaned up as
a result of this change.
it is non-trivial to reproduce this bug through rustdoc,
which uses this function less than clippy,
so the regression test was added as a unit test
instead of an integration test.
Use `cfg_attr_trace` in AST with a placeholder attribute for accurate suggestion
In rust-lang/rust#138515, we insert a placeholder attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about the placement of `cfg` attributes. When we suggest removing items with `cfg_attr`s (fixrust-lang/rust#56328) and make them verbose. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused `extern crate`" lint.
```
warning: unused `extern crate`
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
|
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
|
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
|
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
|
```
r? `@petrochenkov`
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
PR 138515, we insert a placeholder attribute so that checks for attributes can still know about the placement of `cfg` attributes. When we suggest removing items with `cfg_attr`s (fix Issue 56328) and make them verbose. We tweak the wording of the existing "unused `extern crate`" lint.
```
warning: unused extern crate
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:9:1
|
LL | extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unused
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/removing-extern-crate.rs:6:9
|
LL | #![warn(rust_2018_idioms)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: `#[warn(unused_extern_crates)]` implied by `#[warn(rust_2018_idioms)]`
help: remove the unused `extern crate`
|
LL - #[cfg_attr(test, macro_use)]
LL - extern crate removing_extern_crate as foo;
LL +
|
```
Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
r? `@fee1-dead`
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
Improve handling of rustdoc lints when used with raw doc fragments.
1. `rustdoc::bare_urls` no longer outputs incoherent suggestions if `source_span_for_markdown_range` returns None, instead outputting no suggestion
2. `source_span_for_markdown_range` has one more heuristic, so it will return `None` less often.
3. add ui test to make sure we don't emit nonsense suggestions.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135851
1. rustdoc::bare_urls doesn't output
invalid suggestions if source_span_for_markdown_range
fails to find a span
2. source_span_for_markdown_range tries harder to
return a span by applying an additional diagnostic
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135851
only resolve top-level guard patterns' guards once
We resolve guard patterns' guards in `resolve_pattern_inner`, so to avoid resolving them multiple times, we must avoid doing so earlier. To accomplish this, `LateResolutionVisitor::visit_pat` contains a case for guard patterns that avoids visiting their guards while walking patterns.
This PR fixes#141265, which was due to `visit::walk_pat` being used instead; this meant guards at the top level of a pattern would be visited twice. e.g. it would ICE on `for x if x in [] {}`, but not `for (x if x) in [] {}`. `visit_pat` was already used for the guard pattern in the second example, on account of the top-level pattern being parens.
Suggest use "{}", self.x instead of {self.x} when resolve x as field of `self`
Fixes#141136
Changes can be seen in the second commit: 9de7fff0d8
r? compiler
We resolve guard patterns' guards in `resolve_pattern_inner`, so to
avoid resolving them multiple times, we must avoid doing so earlier. To
accomplish this, `LateResolutionVisitor::visit_pat` contains a case for
guard patterns that avoids visiting their guards while walking patterns.
This fixes an ICE due to `visit::walk_pat` being used instead, which
meant guards at the top level of a pattern would be visited twice.
make `rustc_attr_parsing` less dominant in the rustc crate graph
It has/had a glob re-export of `rustc_attr_data_structures`, which is a crate much lower in the graph, and a lot of crates were using it *just* (or *mostly*) for that re-export, while they can rely on `rustc_attr_data_structures` directly.
Previous graph:
Graph with this PR:
The first commit keeps the re-export, and just changes the dependency if possible. The second commit is the "breaking change" which removes the re-export, and "explicitly" adds the `rustc_attr_data_structures` dependency where needed. It also switches over some src/tools/*.
The second commit is actually a lot more involved than I expected. Please let me know if it's a better idea to back it out and just keep the first commit.
name resolution for guard patterns
This PR provides an initial implementation of name resolution for guard patterns [(RFC 3637)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md). This does not change the requirement that the bindings on either side of an or-pattern must be the same [(proposal here)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3637-guard-patterns.md#allowing-mismatching-bindings-when-possible); the code that handles that is separate from what this PR touches, so I'm saving it for a follow-up.
On a technical level, this separates "collecting the bindings in a pattern" (which was already done for or-patterns) from "introducing those bindings into scope". I believe the approach used here can be extended straightforwardly in the future to work with `if let` guard patterns, but I haven't tried it myself since we don't allow those yet.
Tracking issue for guard patterns: #129967
cc ``@Nadrieril``
Prefer to suggest stable candidates rather than unstable ones
Fixes#140240
The logic is to replace unstable suggestions if we meet a new stable one, and do nothing if any other situation. In old logic, we just use the first candidate we meet as the suggestion for the same items.
E.g., `std::range::legacy::Range` vs `std::ops::Range`, `legacy` in the former is unstable, we prefer to suggest use the latter.
