I find that these structs obfuscate the code. Removing them and just
passing the individual fields around makes the `Partition` method
signatures a little longer, but makes the data flow much clearer. E.g.
- `codegen_units` is mutable all the way through.
- `codegen_units`'s length is changed by `merge_codegen_units`, but only
the individual elements are changed by `place_inlined_mono_items` and
`internalize_symbols`.
- `roots`, `internalization_candidates`, and `mono_item_placements` are
all immutable after creation, and all used by just one of the four
methods.
Three of the four methods in `DefaultPartitioning` are defined in
`default.rs`. But `merge_codegen_units` is defined in a separate module,
`merging`, even though it's less than 100 lines of code and roughly the
same size as the other three methods. (Also, the `merging` module
currently sits alongside `default`, when it should be a submodule of
`default`, adding to the confusion.)
In #74275 this explanation was given:
> I pulled this out into a separate module since it seemed like we might
> want a few different merge algorithms to choose from.
But in the three years since there have been no additional merging
algorithms, and there is no mechanism for choosing between different
merging algorithms. (There is a mechanism,
`-Zcgu-partitioning-strategy`, for choosing between different
partitioning strategies, but the merging algorithm is just one piece of
a partitioning strategy.)
This commit merges `merging` into `default`, making the code easier to
navigate and read.
Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`
The detection of slice reference of `{integral}` in `rustc_on_unimplemented` is hacky, but a proper solution requires changing `FmtPrinter` to add a parameter to print integers as `{integral}` and I didn't want to change it just for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. I can do that if requested, though.
I'm open to better wording; this is the best I could come up with.
Mark internal functions and traits unsafe to reflect preconditions
No semantics are changed in this PR; I only mark some functions and and a trait `unsafe` which already had implicit preconditions. Although it seems somewhat redundant for `numfmt::Part::Copy` to contain a `&[u8]` instead of a `&str`, given that all of its current consumers ultimately expect valid UTF-8. Is the type also intended to work for byte-slice formatting in the future?
fix recursion depth handling after confirmation
fixes#111729
I think having to use `Obligation::with_depth` correctly everywhere is very hard because e.g. the nested obligations from `eq` currently do not have the correct obligation depth.
The new solver [completely removes `recursion_depth` from obligations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/traits/solve/struct.Goal.html) and instead tracks the depth in the solver itself which is far easier to get right. Moving the old solver towards this shouldn't be that hard but is probably somewhat annoying.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Fix duplicate `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` calls when using the uninit `Arc` constructors
What this fixes is the duplicate calls to `arcinner_layout_for_value_layout` seen here: https://godbolt.org/z/jr5Gxozhj
The issue was discovered alongside #111603 but is otherwise unrelated to the duplicate `alloca`s, which remain unsolved. Everything I tried to solve said main issue has failed.
As for the duplicate layout calculations, I also tried slapping `#[inline]` and `#[inline(always)]` on everything in sight but the only thing that worked in the end is to dedup the calls by hand.
Add extra debug assertions for equality for Adt/Variant/FieldDef
Would've made it easier to both catch and test https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)
This is a revival of #111523 because I think I pushed an empty branch and bors got a bit too excited it closed the PR.
Document `Pin` memory layout
The fact that `Pin` is `#[repr(transparent)]` technically isn't documented anywhere currently. I don't see any reason why `Pin`'s layout would ever change, so this PR codifies it.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs +A-docs +A-layout +A-pin
Render test messages from bootstrap
Bootstrap was not rendering messages from the test harness when a test failed. This can include messages like "test did not panic as expected". This fixes it by making sure those messages are printed on failure.
Fixes#111825
Don't use inner macro in `marker_impls`
Just recurse instead of having to define an inner macro to avoid the problem with expansion binders being misnumbered between the `$meta` and `$T` variables.
cc `@Veykril` this should fixrust-lang/rust-analyzer#14862 since we've gotten rid of the inner macro.
rustdoc: include strikethrough in item summary
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111822. Since **bold** and *italic* are included, I don't see why ~~strikethrough~~ shouldn't be.
Replace `QueryStruct` with arrays local to `rustc_query_impl`
This removes `QueryStruct` and instead uses constant arrays of function pointers for `try_collect_active_jobs`, `alloc_self_profile_query_strings` and `encode_query_results`. This further decouples `rustc_query_impl` from `rustc_middle`.
r? `@cjgillot`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111745 (Fix overflow in error emitter)
- #111770 (Read beta version from the version file if building from a source tarball)
- #111797 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #111809 (Unset MIRI_BLESS for mir-opt-level 4 miri tests)
- #111817 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Unset MIRI_BLESS for mir-opt-level 4 miri tests
When running `x.py test src/tools/miri --bless`, the 2nd test run (with mir-opt-level 4) crashes because it disables ui checking, which is incompatible with blessing. This PR fixes that by not trying to bless that run.
Read beta version from the version file if building from a source tarball
This pull request changes the `bootstrap` behaviour so that when building `rustc` from a source tarball, the beta revision number is correctly read from the `version` file instead of erroring out by invoking `git`.
The `version` file is observed to only exist in the official source tarball and has the following format:
```
1.70.0-beta.4 (2013813b6 2023-05-07)
```
Fix overflow in error emitter
Fix#109854Close#94171 (was already fixed before but missing test)
This bug happens when a multipart suggestion spans more than one line.
The fix is to update the `acc` variable, which didn't handle the case when the text to remove spans multiple lines but the text to add spans only one line.
Also, use `usize::try_from` instead of `as usize` to detect overflows earlier in the future, and point to the source of the overflow (the original issue points to a different place where this value is used, not where the overflow had happened).
And finally add an `if start != end` check to avoid doing any extra work in case of empty ranges.
Long explanation:
Given this test case:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
generate_setter,
r#"
pub(crate) struct Person<T: Clone> {}
"#,
r#""#,
);
}
```
The compiler will try to convert that code into the following:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
/* usize */,
);
}
```
So it creates a suggestion with 3 separate parts:
```
// Replace "generate_setter" with "/* usize */"
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:5: 4:20 (#0), snippet: "/* usize */" }
// Remove second arg (multiline string)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:20: 7:3 (#0), snippet: "" }
// Remove third arg (r#""#)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:7:3: 8:11 (#0), snippet: "" }
```
Each of this parts gets a separate `SubstitutionHighlight` (this marks the relevant text green in a terminal, the values are 0-indexed so `start: 4` means column 5):
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 18446744073709551614, end: 18446744073709551614 }
```
The 2nd and 3rd suggestion are empty (start = end) because they only remove text, so there are no additions to highlight. But the 3rd span has overflowed because the compiler assumes that the 3rd suggestion is on the same line as the first suggestion. The 2nd span starts at column 20 and the highlight starts at column 16 (15+1), so that suggestion is good. But since the 3rd span starts at column 3, the result is `3 - 4`, or column -1, which turns into -2 with 0-indexed, and that's equivalent to `18446744073709551614 as isize`.
With this fix, the resulting `SubstitutionHighlight` are:
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
```
As expected. I guess ideally we shouldn't emit empty highlights when removing text, but I am too scared to change that.
Don't inline functions with unsized args
Fixes#111355 .
I have some ideas for how we can get this back in the future, out of scope for this PR though.
r? `@cjgillot`
CFI: Fix encode_ty: unexpected Param(B/#1)
Fixes#111510 and complements #106547 by adding support for encoding type parameters and also by transforming trait objects' traits into their identities before emitting type checks.
don't skip inference for type in `offset_of!`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111678 by no longer skipping inference on the type in `offset_of!`. Simply erasing the regions the during writeback isn't enough and can cause ICEs. A test case for this is included.
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111661, because it becomes redundant, since inference already erases the regions.
Fix local libs not included when printing native static libs
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111643 by adding the local used libs to the printed `--print=native-static-libs` output.
It seems that `--print=native-static-libs` doesn't have any test, so I added one. It's very simple and doesn't even tries to compile the result to a binary as I don't know how to handle external library linking in CI. (Note that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/run-make/staticlib-dylib-linkage/Makefile does compile to a binary)
r? `@bjorn3`
