Fix pretty HIR for anon consts in diagnostics
This removes the `NoAnn` printer which skips over nested bodies altogether, which is confusing, and requires users of `{ty|qpath|pat}_to_string` to pass in `&tcx` which now impleemnts `hir_pretty::PpAnn`.
There's one case where this "regresses" by actually printing out the body of the anon const -- we could suppress that, but I don't expect people to actually get anon consts like that unless they're fuzzing, tbh.
r? estebank
Don't even parse an intrinsic unless the feature gate is enabled
Don't return true in `tcx.is_intrinsic` if the function is defined locally and `#![feature(intrinsics)]` is not enabled. This is a slightly more general fix than #123526, since #123587 shows that we have simplifying assumptions about intrinsics elsewhere in the compiler.
This will make the code ICE again if the user **enables** `#[feature(intrinsics)]`, but I kind of feel like if we want to fix that, we should make the `INTERNAL_FEATURES` lint `Deny` again. Perhaps we could do that on non-nightly compilers. Or we should just stop compilation altogether if they have `#![feature]` enabled on a non-nightly compiler.
As for the UX of *real* cases of hitting these ICEs, I believe pretty strongly that if a compiler/stdlib dev is modifying internal intrinsics (intentionally, like when making a change to rustc) we have no guarantee to make the ICE better looking for them. Honestly, *not* spitting out a stack trace is probably a disservice to the people who hit those ICEs in that case.
r? `@Nilstrieb` `@estebank`
Use the rustc_private libc less in tests
I started looking into our use of `rustc_private` + `extern crate libc;` in tests because of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123938 and it looks like some fraction of the users of libc simply don't need the libc crate anymore.
Fix various bugs in `ty_kind_suggestion`
Consolidates two implementations of `ty_kind_suggestion`
Fixes some misuse of the empty param-env
Fixes a problem where we suggested `(42)` instead of `(42,)` for tuple suggestions
Suggest a value when `return;`, making it consistent with `break;`
Fixes#123906
builtin-derive: tag → discriminant
As far as I can tell, all of this operates on the discriminant, not the tag. After all, with something like `Option<&T>`, the "tag" of the `Some` variant is basically just the reference value, which is never what you want to compare when figuring out which variant the enum is in.
See [here](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/appendix/glossary.html) for an explanation of the difference between tag and discriminant.
Discard overflow obligations in `impl_may_apply`
Hacky fix for #123493. Throws away obligations that are overflowing in `impl_may_apply` when we recompute if an impl applies, since those will lead to fatal overflow if processed during fulfillment.
Something about #114811 (I think it's the predicate reordering) caused us to evaluate predicates differently in error reporting leading to fatal overflow, though I believe the underlying overflow is possible to hit since this code was rewritten to use fulfillment.
Fixes#123493
Get rid of `USIZE_MARKER` in formatting infrastructure
An alternative to #123780.
The `USIZE_MARKER` function used to differentiate between placeholder and count arguments is never called anyway, so we can just replace the function-pointer-comparison hack with an `enum` and an `unreachable_unchecked`, hopefully without causing a regression.
CC `@RalfJung`
Detect borrow checker errors where `.clone()` would be an appropriate user action
When a value is moved twice, suggest cloning the earlier move:
```
error[E0509]: cannot move out of type `U2`, which implements the `Drop` trait
--> $DIR/union-move.rs:49:18
|
LL | move_out(x.f1_nocopy);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| cannot move out of here
| move occurs because `x.f1_nocopy` has type `ManuallyDrop<RefCell<i32>>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | move_out(x.f1_nocopy.clone());
| ++++++++
```
When a value is borrowed by an `fn` call, consider if cloning the result of the call would be reasonable, and suggest cloning that, instead of the argument:
```
error[E0505]: cannot move out of `a` because it is borrowed
--> $DIR/variance-issue-20533.rs:53:14
|
LL | let a = AffineU32(1);
| - binding `a` declared here
LL | let x = bat(&a);
| -- borrow of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(a);
| ^ move out of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(x);
| - borrow later used here
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL | let x = bat(&a).clone();
| ++++++++
```
otherwise, suggest cloning the argument:
```
error[E0505]: cannot move out of `a` because it is borrowed
--> $DIR/variance-issue-20533.rs:59:14
|
LL | let a = ClonableAffineU32(1);
| - binding `a` declared here
LL | let x = foo(&a);
| -- borrow of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(a);
| ^ move out of `a` occurs here
LL | drop(x);
| - borrow later used here
|
help: consider cloning the value if the performance cost is acceptable
|
LL - let x = foo(&a);
LL + let x = foo(a.clone());
|
```
This suggestion doesn't attempt to square out the types between what's cloned and what the `fn` expects, to allow the user to make a determination on whether to change the `fn` call or `fn` definition themselves.
Special case move errors caused by `FnOnce`:
```
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `blk`
--> $DIR/once-cant-call-twice-on-heap.rs:8:5
|
LL | fn foo<F:FnOnce()>(blk: F) {
| --- move occurs because `blk` has type `F`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
LL | blk();
| ----- `blk` moved due to this call
LL | blk();
| ^^^ value used here after move
|
note: `FnOnce` closures can only be called once
--> $DIR/once-cant-call-twice-on-heap.rs:6:10
|
LL | fn foo<F:FnOnce()>(blk: F) {
| ^^^^^^^^ `F` is made to be an `FnOnce` closure here
LL | blk();
| ----- this value implements `FnOnce`, which causes it to be moved when called
```
Account for redundant `.clone()` calls in resulting suggestions:
```
error[E0507]: cannot move out of dereference of `S`
--> $DIR/needs-clone-through-deref.rs:15:18
|
LL | for _ in self.clone().into_iter() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ----------- value moved due to this method call
| |
| move occurs because value has type `Vec<usize>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
|
note: `into_iter` takes ownership of the receiver `self`, which moves value
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/iter/traits/collect.rs:LL:COL
help: you can `clone` the value and consume it, but this might not be your desired behavior
|
LL | for _ in <Vec<usize> as Clone>::clone(&self).into_iter() {}
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ~
```
We use the presence of `&mut` values in a move error as a proxy for the user caring about side effects, so we don't emit a clone suggestion in that case:
```
error[E0505]: cannot move out of `s` because it is borrowed
--> $DIR/borrowck-overloaded-index-move-index.rs:53:7
|
LL | let mut s = "hello".to_string();
| ----- binding `s` declared here
LL | let rs = &mut s;
| ------ borrow of `s` occurs here
...
LL | f[s] = 10;
| ^ move out of `s` occurs here
...
LL | use_mut(rs);
| -- borrow later used here
```
We properly account for `foo += foo;` errors where we *don't* suggest `foo.clone() += foo;`, instead suggesting `foo += foo.clone();`.
---
Each commit can be reviewed in isolation. There are some "cleanup" commits, but kept them separate in order to show *why* specific changes were being made, and their effect on tests' output.
Fix#49693, CC #64167.
Avoid more NonNull-raw-NonNull roundtrips in Vec
r? the8472
The standard library in general has a lot of these round-trips from niched types to their raw innards and back. Such round-trips have overhead in debug builds since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120594. I removed some such round-trips in that initial PR and I've been meaning to come back and hunt down more such examples (this is the last item on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120848).
Add `/System/iOSSupport` to the library search path on Mac Catalyst
On macOS, `/System/iOSSupport` contains iOS frameworks like UIKit, which is the whole idea of Mac Catalyst.
To link to these, we need to explicitly tell the linker about the support library stubs provided in the macOS SDK under the same path.
Concretely, when building a binary for Mac Catalyst, Xcode passes the following flags to the linker:
```
-iframework /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.2.sdk/System/iOSSupport/System/Library/Frameworks
-L/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.2.sdk/System/iOSSupport/usr/lib
```
This is not something that can be disabled (it's enabled as soon as you enable `SUPPORTS_MACCATALYST`), so I think it's pretty safe to say that we don't need an option to turn these off.
I've chosen to slightly deviate from what Xcode does and use `-F` instead of `-iframework`, since we don't need to change the header search path, and this way the flags nicely match on all the linkers. From what I could tell by reading Clang sources, there shouldn't be a difference when just running the linker.
CC `@BlackHoleFox,` `@shepmaster` (I accidentally let rustbot choose the reviewer).
typeck: fix `?` suggestion span
Noticed in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112043#issuecomment-2043565292>, if the
```
use the `?` operator to extract the `Result<(), std::fmt::Error>` value, propagating a `Result::Err` value to the caller
```
suggestion is applied to a macro that comes from a non-local crate (e.g. the stdlib), the suggestion span can become non-local, which will cause newer rustfix versions to fail.
This PR tries to remedy the problem by recursively probing ancestors of the expression span, trying to identify the most ancestor span that is (1) still local, and (2) still shares the same syntax context as the expression.
This is the same strategy used in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112043.
The test unfortunately cannot `//@ run-rustfix` because there are two conflicting MaybeIncorrect suggestions that when collectively applied, cause the fixed source file to become non-compilable.
Also avoid running `//@ run-rustfix` for `tests/ui/typeck/issue-112007-leaked-writeln-macro-internals.rs` because that also contains conflicting suggestions.
cc `@ehuss` who noticed this. This question mark span fix + not running rustfix on the tests containing conflicting MaybeIncorrect suggestions should hopefully unblock rustfix from updating.
The suggestion to use `let else` with an uninitialized refutable `let`
statement was erroneous: `let else` cannot be used with deferred
initialization.
Improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier
Resolves#123529
This PR improve diagnostic by suggesting to remove visibility qualifier.
Fix invalid silencing of parsing error
Given
```rust
macro_rules! a {
( ) => {
impl<'b> c for d {
e::<f'g>
}
};
}
```
ensure an error is emitted.
Fix#123079.
Don't delay a bug if we suggest adding a semicolon to the RHS of an assign operator
It only makes sense to delay a bug based on the assumption that "[we] defer to the later error produced by `check_lhs_assignable`" *if* the expression we're erroring actually is an LHS; otherwise, we should still report the error since it's both useful and required.
Fixes#123722
Fix revisions syntax in cfg(ub_checks) test
`//@ revisions YES NO` doesn't do anything without the `:`. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
r? jieyouxu
Stop using `HirId` for fn-like parents since closures are not `OwnerNode`s
This is a minimal fix for #123273.
I'm overall pretty disappointed w/ the state of this code; although it's "just diagnostics", it still should be maintainable and understandable and neither of those are true. I believe this code really needs some major overhauling before anything more should be added to it, because there are subtle invariants that are being exercised and subsequently broken all over the place, and I don't think we should just paper over them (e.g.) by delaying bugs or things like that. I wouldn't be surprised if fixing up this code would also yield better diagnostics.
Silence `unused_imports` for redundant imports
Quick fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121708#issuecomment-2048105393
r? `@petrochenkov` cc `@joshtriplett`
I think this is right, would like confirmation. I also think it's weird that we're using `=` to assign to `is_redundant` but using `per_ns` for the actual spans. Seems like this could be weirdly order dependent, but that's unrelated to this change.
Account for trait/impl difference when suggesting changing argument from ref to mut ref
Do not ICE when encountering a lifetime error involving an argument with an immutable reference of a method that differs from the trait definition.
Fix#123414.
