Support AIX-style archive type
Reading facility of AIX big archive has been supported by `object` since 0.30.0.
Writing facility of AIX big archive has already been supported by `ar_archive_writer`, but we need to bump the version to support the new archive type enum.
NotFound errors:
* `ERROR_INVALID_DRIVE`: The system cannot find the drive specified
* `ERROR_BAD_NETPATH`: The network path was not found
* `ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME`: The network name cannot be found.
InvalidFilename:
* `ERROR_BAD_PATHNAME`: The specified path is invalid.
Add Command environment variable inheritance docs
The interaction between the environment variable methods can be confusing. Specifically `env_clear` and `remove_env` have a side effects not mentioned: they disable inheriting environment variables from the parent process. I wanted to fully document this behavior as well as explain relevant edge cases in each of the `Command` env methods.
This is further confused by the return of `get_envs` which will return key/None if `remove_env` has been used, but an empty iterator if `env_clear` has been called. Or a non-empty iterator if `env_clear` was called and later explicit mappings are added. Currently there is no way (that I'm able to find) of observing whether or not the internal `env_clear=true` been toggled on the `Command` struct via its public API.
Ultimately environment variable mappings can be in one of several states:
- Explicitly set value (via `envs` / `env`) will take precedence over parent mapping
- Not explicitly set, will inherit mapping from parent
- Explicitly removed via `remove_env`, this single mapping will not inherit from parent
- Implicitly removed via `env_clear`, no mappings will inherit from parent
I tried to represent this in the relevant sections of the docs.
This is my second-ever doc PR (whoop!). I'm happy to take specific or general doc feedback. Also happy to explain the logic behind any changes or additions I made.
Add `tidy-alphabetical` to features in `alloc` & `std`
So that people have to keep them sorted in future, rather than just sticking them on the end where they conflict more often.
Follow-up to #110269
cc `@jyn514`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #109225 (Clarify that RUST_MIN_STACK may be internally cached)
- #109800 (Improve safe transmute error reporting)
- #110158 (Remove obsolete test case)
- #110180 (don't uniquify regions when canonicalizing)
- #110207 (Assemble `Unpin` candidates specially for generators in new solver)
- #110276 (Remove all but one of the spans in `BoundRegionKind::BrAnon`)
- #110279 (rustdoc: Correctly handle built-in compiler proc-macros as proc-macro and not macro)
- #110298 (Cover edge cases for {f32, f64}.hypot() docs)
- #110299 (Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `impl_subject` query)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Cover edge cases for {f32, f64}.hypot() docs
Fixes#88944
The Euclidean distance is a more general way to express what these functions do, and covers the edge cases of zero and negative inputs.
Does not cover the case of non-normal input values (as the [POSIX docs](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2008edition/) do), but the docs for the rest of the functions in these modules do not address this, I assumed it was not desired.
Clarify that RUST_MIN_STACK may be internally cached
For larger applications it's important that users set `RUST_MIN_STACK` at the start of their program because [`min_stack`](7d3e03666a/library/std/src/sys_common/thread.rs) caches the value. Not doing so can lead to their `env::set_var` call surprisingly not having any effect.
In my own testing `RUST_MIN_STACK` had no effect until I moved it to the top of `main()`. Hopefully this clarification in the docs will help others going forward.
linkat() not available in the system headers of Solaris 10
I've installed rustup on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and would like to use the target sparcv9-sun-solaris. For this, I have built a gcc from the source code for cross-compiling to sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10 with system headers of Solaris 10.
With the following hello word example:
main.rs:
```rust
fn main() {
println!("Hello, world!");
}
```
I had a compilation error:
```
$ rustc -v --target sparcv9-sun-solaris -C linker=/opt/cross-solaris/gcc730/bin/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10-gcc main.rs
error: linking with `/opt/cross-solaris/gcc730/bin/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10-gcc` failed: exit status: 1
|
= note: "/opt/cross-solaris/gcc730/bin/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10-gcc" "-m64" "/tmp/rustcgebYgj/symbols.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.0.rcgu.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.1.rcgu.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.2.rcgu.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.3.rcgu.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.4.rcgu.o" "main.main.89363361-cgu.5.rcgu.o" "main.csypsau9u2r8348.rcgu.o" "-Wl,-z,ignore" "-L" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib" "-Wl,-Bstatic" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libstd-fa47c8247d587714.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libpanic_unwind-5c87bbe223e6c2a3.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libobject-d484934062ff9fbb.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libmemchr-e8dbd5835abcbf43.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libaddr2line-909ad09329bde2f9.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libgimli-4d74a3be929697ac.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/librustc_demangle-47cbe1d7f7271ae1.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libstd_detect-239fd2d25fb32a00.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libhashbrown-c4a7ce45fb9dec19.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libminiz_oxide-fa6bc3d9bfb4e402.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libadler-419f5a82ddd339a3.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/librustc_std_workspace_alloc-7672b378962c11be.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libunwind-0f9e07f0a032c000.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libcfg_if-ede7757c356dfb28.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/liblibc-808d56fbc668148a.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/liballoc-784767fe059ad3fe.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/librustc_std_workspace_core-aa31d7ef0556bbe1.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libcore-81d07df07db18847.rlib" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libcompiler_builtins-313a510e63006db2.rlib" "-Wl,-Bdynamic" "-lsocket" "-lposix4" "-lpthread" "-lresolv" "-lgcc_s" "-lc" "-lm" "-lrt" "-lpthread" "-lsendfile" "-llgrp" "-L" "/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib" "-o" "main" "-nodefaultlibs"
= note: /opt/cross-solaris/gcc730/lib/gcc/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10/7.3.0/../../../../sparcv9-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld: warning: -z ignore ignored.
/home/dlaugt/.rustup/toolchains/stable-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/sparcv9-sun-solaris/lib/libstd-fa47c8247d587714.rlib(std-fa47c8247d587714.std.5c42d2c1-cgu.0.rcgu.o): In function `std::sys::unix::fs:🔗:h3683dfbfbb4995cb':
/rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120/library/std/src/sys/unix/fs.rs:1407: undefined reference to `linkat'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
= help: some `extern` functions couldn't be found; some native libraries may need to be installed or have their path specified
= note: use the `-l` flag to specify native libraries to link
= note: use the `cargo:rustc-link-lib` directive to specify the native libraries to link with Cargo (see https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/build-scripts.html#cargorustc-link-libkindname)
```
linkat() is not available in the system headers of Solaris 10. The hello word example works fine when I build/use rust with this PR change.
don't splice from files into pipes in io::copy
This fixes potential data ordering issue where a write performed after a copy operation could become visible in the copy even though it signaled completion.
I assumed that by not setting `SPLICE_F_MOVE` we would be safe and the kernel would do a copy in kernel space and we could avoid the read-write syscall and copy-to/from-userspace costs. But apparently that flag only makes a difference when splicing from a pipe, but not when splicing into it.
Context: https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/2/9/673
sync::mpsc: synchronize receiver disconnect with initialization
Receiver disconnection relies on the incorrect assumption that `head.index != tail.index` implies that the channel is initialized (i.e `head.block` and `tail.block` point to allocated blocks). However, it can happen that `head.index != tail.index` and `head.block == null` at the same time which leads to a segfault when a channel is dropped in that state.
This can happen because initialization is performed in two steps. First, the tail block is allocated and the `tail.block` is set. If that is successful `head.block` is set to the same pointer. Importantly, initialization is skipped if `tail.block` is not null.
Therefore we can have the following situation:
1. Thread A starts to send the first value of the channel, observes that `tail.block` is null and begins initialization. It sets `tail.block` to point to a newly allocated block and then gets preempted. `head.block` is still null at this point.
2. Thread B starts to send the second value of the channel, observes that `tail.block` *is not* null and proceeds with writing its value in the allocated tail block and sets `tail.index` to 1.
3. Thread B drops the receiver of the channel which observes that `head.index != tail.index` (0 and 1 respectively), therefore there must be messages to drop. It starts traversing the linked list from `head.block` which is still a null pointer, leading to a segfault.
This PR fixes this problem by waiting for initialization to complete when `head.index != tail.index` and the `head.block` is still null. A similar check exists in `start_recv` for similar reasons.
Fixes#110001
Initial support for loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Hi, We hope to add a new port in rust for LoongArch.
LoongArch intro
LoongArch is a RISC style ISA which is independently designed by Loongson
Technology in China. It is divided into two versions, the 32-bit version (LA32)
and the 64-bit version (LA64). LA64 applications have application-level
backward binary compatibility with LA32 applications. LoongArch is composed of
a basic part (Loongson Base) and an expanded part. The expansion part includes
Loongson Binary Translation (LBT), Loongson VirtualiZation (LVZ), Loongson SIMD
EXtension (LSX) and Loongson Advanced SIMD EXtension(LASX).
Currently the LA464 processor core supports LoongArch ISA and the Loongson
3A5000 processor integrates 4 64-bit LA464 cores. LA464 is a four-issue 64-bit
high-performance processor core. It can be used as a single core for high-end
embedded and desktop applications, or as a basic processor core to form an
on-chip multi-core system for server and high-performance machine applications.
Documentations:
ISA:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html
ABI:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.html
More docs can be found at:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/README-EN.html
Since last year, we have locally adapted two versions of rust, rust1.41 and rust1.57, and completed the test locally.
I'm not sure if I'm submitting all the patches at once, so I split up the patches and here's one of the commits
resolve: Preserve reexport chains in `ModChild`ren
This may be potentially useful for
- avoiding uses of `hir::ItemKind::Use` (which usually lead to correctness issues)
- preserving documentation comments on all reexports, including those from other crates
- preserving and checking stability/deprecation info on reexports
- all kinds of diagnostics
The second commit then migrates some hacky logic from rustdoc to `module_reexports` to make it simpler and more correct.
Ideally rustdoc should use `module_reexports` immediately at the top level, so `hir::ItemKind::Use`s are never used.
The second commit also fixes issues with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109330 and therefore
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109631
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109614
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109424
Receiver disconnection relies on the incorrect assumption that
`head.index != tail.index` implies that the channel is initialized (i.e
`head.block` and `tail.block` point to allocated blocks). However, it
can happen that `head.index != tail.index` and `head.block == null` at
the same time which leads to a segfault when a channel is dropped in
that state.
This can happen because initialization is performed in two steps. First,
the tail block is allocated and the `tail.block` is set. If that is
successful `head.block` is set to the same pointer. Importantly,
initialization is skipped if `tail.block` is not null.
Therefore we can have the following situation:
1. Thread A starts to send the first value of the channel, observes that
`tail.block` is null and begins initialization. It sets `tail.block`
to point to a newly allocated block and then gets preempted.
`head.block` is still null at this point.
2. Thread B starts to send the second value of the channel, observes
that `tail.block` *is not* null and proceeds with writing its value
in the allocated tail block and sets `tail.index` to 1.
3. Thread B drops the receiver of the channel which observes that
`head.index != tail.index` (0 and 1 respectively), therefore there
must be messages to drop. It starts traversing the linked list from
`head.block` which is still a null pointer, leading to a segfault.
This PR fixes this problem by waiting for initialization to complete
when `head.index != tail.index` and the `head.block` is still null. A
similar check exists in `start_recv` for similar reasons.
Fixes#110001
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Fix buffer overrun in bootstrap and (test-only) symlink_junction
I don't think these can be hit in practice, due to their inputs being valid paths. It's also not security-sensitive code, but just... bad vibes.
I think this is still not really the right way to do this (in terms of path correctness), but is no worse than it was.
r? `@ChrisDenton`
