The extended syntax for function signature that includes contract clauses
should never be user exposed versus the interface we want to ship
externally eventually.
Target modifiers (special marked options) are recorded in metainfo
Target modifiers (special marked options) are recorded in metainfo and compared to be equal in different linked crates.
PR for this RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3716
Option may be marked as `TARGET_MODIFIER`, example: `regparm: Option<u32> = (None, parse_opt_number, [TRACKED TARGET_MODIFIER]`.
If an TARGET_MODIFIER-marked option has non-default value, it will be recorded in crate metainfo as a `Vec<TargetModifier>`:
```
pub struct TargetModifier {
pub opt: OptionsTargetModifiers,
pub value_name: String,
}
```
OptionsTargetModifiers is a macro-generated enum.
Option value code (for comparison) is generated using `Debug` trait.
Error example:
```
error: mixing `-Zregparm` will cause an ABI mismatch in crate `incompatible_regparm`
--> $DIR/incompatible_regparm.rs:10:1
|
LL | #![crate_type = "lib"]
| ^
|
= help: the `-Zregparm` flag modifies the ABI so Rust crates compiled with different values of this flag cannot be used together safely
= note: `-Zregparm=1` in this crate is incompatible with `-Zregparm=2` in dependency `wrong_regparm`
= help: set `-Zregparm=2` in this crate or `-Zregparm=1` in `wrong_regparm`
= help: if you are sure this will not cause problems, use `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=regparm` to silence this error
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
```
`-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=regparm,reg-struct-return` to disable list of flags.
Autodiff Upstreaming - rustc_codegen_ssa, rustc_middle
This PR should not be merged until the rustc_codegen_llvm part is merged.
I will also alter it a little based on what get's shaved off from the cg_llvm PR,
and address some of the feedback I received in the other PR (including cleanups).
I am putting it already up to
1) Discuss with `@jieyouxu` if there is more work needed to add tests to this and
2) Pray that there is someone reviewing who can tell me why some of my autodiff invocations get lost.
Re 1: My test require fat-lto. I also modify the compilation pipeline. So if there are any other llvm-ir tests in the same compilation unit then I will likely break them. Luckily there are two groups who currently have the same fat-lto requirement for their GPU code which I have for my autodiff code and both groups have some plans to enable support for thin-lto. Once either that work pans out, I'll copy it over for this feature. I will also work on not changing the optimization pipeline for functions not differentiated, but that will require some thoughts and engineering, so I think it would be good to be able to run the autodiff tests isolated from the rest for now. Can you guide me here please?
For context, here are some of my tests in the samples folder: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rustbook
Re 2: This is a pretty serious issue, since it effectively prevents publishing libraries making use of autodiff: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/173. For some reason my dummy code persists till the end, so the code which calls autodiff, deletes the dummy, and inserts the code to compute the derivative never gets executed. To me it looks like the rustc_autodiff attribute just get's dropped, but I don't know WHY? Any help would be super appreciated, as rustc queries look a bit voodoo to me.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
r? `@jieyouxu`
Fix deduplication mismatches in vtables leading to upcasting unsoundness
We currently have two cases where subtleties in supertraits can trigger disagreements in the vtable layout, e.g. leading to a different vtable layout being accessed at a callsite compared to what was prepared during unsizing. Namely:
### #135315
In this example, we were not normalizing supertraits when preparing vtables. In the example,
```
trait Supertrait<T> {
fn _print_numbers(&self, mem: &[usize; 100]) {
println!("{mem:?}");
}
}
impl<T> Supertrait<T> for () {}
trait Identity {
type Selff;
}
impl<Selff> Identity for Selff {
type Selff = Selff;
}
trait Middle<T>: Supertrait<()> + Supertrait<T> {
fn say_hello(&self, _: &usize) {
println!("Hello!");
}
}
impl<T> Middle<T> for () {}
trait Trait: Middle<<() as Identity>::Selff> {}
impl Trait for () {}
fn main() {
(&() as &dyn Trait as &dyn Middle<()>).say_hello(&0);
}
```
When we prepare `dyn Trait`, we see a supertrait of `Middle<<() as Identity>::Selff>`, which itself has two supertraits `Supertrait<()>` and `Supertrait<<() as Identity>::Selff>`. These two supertraits are identical, but they are not duplicated because we were using structural equality and *not* considering normalization. This leads to a vtable layout with two trait pointers.
When we upcast to `dyn Middle<()>`, those two supertraits are now the same, leading to a vtable layout with only one trait pointer. This leads to an offset error, and we call the wrong method.
### #135316
This one is a bit more interesting, and is the bulk of the changes in this PR. It's a bit similar, except it uses binder equality instead of normalization to make the compiler get confused about two vtable layouts. In the example,
```
trait Supertrait<T> {
fn _print_numbers(&self, mem: &[usize; 100]) {
println!("{mem:?}");
}
}
impl<T> Supertrait<T> for () {}
trait Trait<T, U>: Supertrait<T> + Supertrait<U> {
fn say_hello(&self, _: &usize) {
println!("Hello!");
}
}
impl<T, U> Trait<T, U> for () {}
fn main() {
(&() as &'static dyn for<'a> Trait<&'static (), &'a ()>
as &'static dyn Trait<&'static (), &'static ()>)
.say_hello(&0);
}
```
When we prepare the vtable for `dyn for<'a> Trait<&'static (), &'a ()>`, we currently consider the PolyTraitRef of the vtable as the key for a supertrait. This leads two two supertraits -- `Supertrait<&'static ()>` and `for<'a> Supertrait<&'a ()>`.
However, we can upcast[^up] without offsetting the vtable from `dyn for<'a> Trait<&'static (), &'a ()>` to `dyn Trait<&'static (), &'static ()>`. This is just instantiating the principal trait ref for a specific `'a = 'static`. However, when considering those supertraits, we now have only one distinct supertrait -- `Supertrait<&'static ()>` (which is deduplicated since there are two supertraits with the same substitutions). This leads to similar offsetting issues, leading to the wrong method being called.
[^up]: I say upcast but this is a cast that is allowed on stable, since it's not changing the vtable at all, just instantiating the binder of the principal trait ref for some lifetime.
The solution here is to recognize that a vtable isn't really meaningfully higher ranked, and to just treat a vtable as corresponding to a `TraitRef` so we can do this deduplication more faithfully. That is to say, the vtable for `dyn for<'a> Tr<'a>` and `dyn Tr<'x>` are always identical, since they both would correspond to a set of free regions on an impl... Do note that `Tr<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>` and `Tr<fn(&'static ())>` are still distinct.
----
There's a bit more that can be cleaned up. In codegen, we can stop using `PolyExistentialTraitRef` basically everywhere. We can also fix SMIR to stop storing `PolyExistentialTraitRef` in its vtable allocations.
As for testing, it's difficult to actually turn this into something that can be tested with `rustc_dump_vtable`, since having multiple supertraits that are identical is a recipe for ambiguity errors. Maybe someone else is more creative with getting that attr to work, since the tests I added being run-pass tests is a bit unsatisfying. Miri also doesn't help here, since it doesn't really generate vtables that are offset by an index in the same way as codegen.
r? `@lcnr` for the vibe check? Or reassign, idk. Maybe let's talk about whether this makes sense.
<sup>(I guess an alternative would also be to not do any deduplication of vtable supertraits (or only a really conservative subset) rather than trying to normalize and deduplicate more faithfully here. Not sure if that works and is sufficient tho.)</sup>
cc `@steffahn` -- ty for the minimizations
cc `@WaffleLapkin` -- since you're overseeing the feature stabilization :3
Fixes#135315Fixes#135316
Remove -Zinline-in-all-cgus and clean up tests/codegen-units/
Implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/814
I've taken some liberties with cleaning up the CGU partitioning tests, because that's the only place this flag was used and also mattered. I've often fought a lot with the contents of `tests/codegen-units` and it has never been clear to me when a test failure indicates a problem with my changes as opposed to a test just needing to be manually blessed. Hopefully the combination of the new README, new comments, and using `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` in the partitioning tests improves that.
I've also deleted some of the `tests/run-make/sepcomp` tests. I think all the "sepcomp" tests have been obviated for years by better-designed (less flaky, clearer failures) test suites, but here I'm just deleting the ones I'm confident in.
bump compiler and tools to windows 0.59, bootstrap to 0.57
This bumps compiler and tools to windows 0.59 (temporary dupes version, as `sysinfo` still depend on <= 0.57).
Bootstrap bumps only to 0.57 (the same sysinfo dep).
This additionally resolves my comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130874#issuecomment-2393562071
Will work on it in follow up pr: There still some sus imports for `rustc_driver.dll` like ws2_32 or RoOriginateErrorW, but i will look at them later.
remove support for the (unstable) #[start] attribute
As explained by `@Noratrieb:`
`#[start]` should be deleted. It's nothing but an accidentally leaked implementation detail that's a not very useful mix between "portable" entrypoint logic and bad abstraction.
I think the way the stable user-facing entrypoint should work (and works today on stable) is pretty simple:
- `std`-using cross-platform programs should use `fn main()`. the compiler, together with `std`, will then ensure that code ends up at `main` (by having a platform-specific entrypoint that gets directed through `lang_start` in `std` to `main` - but that's just an implementation detail)
- `no_std` platform-specific programs should use `#![no_main]` and define their own platform-specific entrypoint symbol with `#[no_mangle]`, like `main`, `_start`, `WinMain` or `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here`. most of them only support a single platform anyways, and need cfg for the different platform's ways of passing arguments or other things *anyways*
`#[start]` is in a super weird position of being neither of those two. It tries to pretend that it's cross-platform, but its signature is a total lie. Those arguments are just stubbed out to zero on ~~Windows~~ wasm, for example. It also only handles the platform-specific entrypoints for a few platforms that are supported by `std`, like Windows or Unix-likes. `my_embedded_platform_wants_to_start_here` can't use it, and neither could a libc-less Linux program.
So we have an attribute that only works in some cases anyways, that has a signature that's a total lie (and a signature that, as I might want to add, has changed recently, and that I definitely would not be comfortable giving *any* stability guarantees on), and where there's a pretty easy way to get things working without it in the first place.
Note that this feature has **not** been RFCed in the first place.
*This comment was posted [in May](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633#issuecomment-2088596042) and so far nobody spoke up in that issue with a usecase that would require keeping the attribute.*
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29633
try-job: x86_64-gnu-nopt
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-2
try-job: test-various
Rename FileName::QuoteExpansion to CfgSpec
I believe this variant name was used incorrectly. The timeline is roughly:
* `FileName::cfg_spec_source_code` was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54517. However, it used `FileName::Quote` instead of `FileName::CfgSpec` which I believe was a mistake.
* Quote stuff was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51285, but did not remove `FileName::Quote`.
* `FileName::CfgSpec` was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116474 because it was unused.
This restores it so that the `--cfg` variant uses a name that makes more sense with how it is used, and restores what I think is the original intent.
I believe this variant name was used incorrectly. The timeline is roughly:
* `FileName::cfg_spec_source_code` was added in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54517. However, it used
`FileName::Quote` instead of `FileName::CfgSpec` which I believe was a
mistake.
* Quote stuff was removed in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51285, but did not remove
`FileName::Quote`.
* `FileName::CfgSpec` was removed in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116474 because it was unused.
This restores it so that the `--cfg` variant uses a name that makes more
sense with how it is used, and restores what I think is the original
intent.
add `-Zmin-function-alignment`
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
This PR adds the `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` flag, that specifies a minimum alignment for all* functions.
### Motivation
This feature is requested by RfL [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128830):
> i.e. the equivalents of `-fmin-function-alignment` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fmin-function-alignment_003dn), Clang does not support it) / `-falign-functions` ([GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-falign-functions), [Clang](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.html#cmdoption-clang1-falign-functions)).
>
> For the Linux kernel, the behavior wanted is that of GCC's `-fmin-function-alignment` and Clang's `-falign-functions`, i.e. align all functions, including cold functions.
>
> There is [`feature(fn_align)`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232), but we need to do it globally.
### Behavior
The `fn_align` feature does not have an RFC. It was decided at the time that it would not be necessary, but maybe we feel differently about that now? In any case, here are the semantics of this flag:
- `-Zmin-function-alignment=<align>` specifies the minimum alignment of all* functions
- the `#[repr(align(<align>))]` attribute can be used to override the function alignment on a per-function basis: when `-Zmin-function-alignment` is specified, the attribute's value is only used when it is higher than the value passed to `-Zmin-function-alignment`.
- the target may decide to use a higher value (e.g. on x86_64 the minimum that LLVM generates is 16)
- The highest supported alignment in rust is `2^29`: I checked a bunch of targets, and they all emit the `.p2align 29` directive for targets that align functions at all (some GPU stuff does not have function alignment).
*: Only with `build-std` would the minimum alignment also be applied to `std` functions.
---
cc `@ojeda`
r? `@workingjubilee` you were active on the tracking issue
mark deprecated option as deprecated in rustc_session to remove copypasta and small refactor
This marks deprecated options as deprecated via flag in options table in rustc_session, which removes copypasted deprecation text from rustc_driver_impl.
This also adds warning for deprecated `-C ar` option, which didn't emitted any warnings before.
Makes `inline_threshold` `[UNTRACKED]`, as it do nothing.
Adds few tests.
See individual commits.
Add support for wasm exception handling to Emscripten target
This is a draft because we need some additional setting for the Emscripten target to select between the old exception handling and the new exception handling. I don't know how to add a setting like that, would appreciate advice from Rust folks. We could maybe choose to use the new exception handling if `Ctarget-feature=+exception-handling` is passed? I tried this but I get errors from llvm so I'm not doing it right.
inline_threshold mark deprecated
no-stack-check
print deprecation message for -Car too
inline_threshold deprecated and do nothing: make in untracked
make OptionDesc struct from tuple
Reduce the amount of explicit FatalError.raise()
Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't silently abort.
Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These
guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't
silently abort.
Improve dependency_format a bit
* Make `DependencyList` an `IndexVec` rather than emulating one using a `Vec` (which was off-by-one as LOCAL_CRATE was intentionally skipped)
* Update some comments for the fact that we now use `#[global_allocator]` rather than `extern crate alloc_system;`/`extern crate alloc_jemalloc;` for specifying which allocator to use. We still use a similar mechanism for the panic runtime, so refer to the panic runtime in those comments instead.
* An unrelated refactor to `create_and_enter_global_ctxt` I forgot to include in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134302. This refactor is too small to be worth it's own PR.
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
A bunch of cleanups (part 2)
Just like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133567 these were all found while looking at the respective code, but are not blocking any other changes I want to make in the short term.
forbid toggling x87 and fpregs on hard-float targets
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344, follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129884:
The `x87` target feature on x86 and the `fpregs` target feature on ARM must not be disabled on a hardfloat target, as that would change the float ABI. However, *enabling* `fpregs` on ARM is [explicitly requested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130988) as it seems to be useful. Therefore, we need to refine the distinction of "forbidden" target features and "allowed" target features: all (un)stable target features can determine on a per-target basis whether they should be allowed to be toggled or not. `fpregs` then checks whether the current target has the `soft-float` feature, and if yes, `fpregs` is permitted -- otherwise, it is not. (Same for `x87` on x86).
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132351. Since `fpregs` and `x87` can be enabled on some builds and disabled on others, it would make sense that one can query it via `cfg`. Therefore, I made them behave in `cfg` like any other unstable target feature.
The first commit prepares the infrastructure, but does not change behavior. The second commit then wires up `fpregs` and `x87` with that new infrastructure.
r? `@workingjubilee`
