Some hir cleanups
It seemed odd to not put `AnonConst` in the arena, compared with the other types that we did put into an arena. This way we can also give it a `Span` without growing a lot of other HIR data structures because of the extra field.
r? compiler
Use `tcx.types.unit` instead of `Ty::new_unit(tcx)`
I don't think there is any need for the function, given that we can just access the `.types`, similarly to all other primitives?
Adjust `#[macro_export]`/doctest help suggestion for non_local_defs lint
This PR adjust the help suggestion of the `non_local_definitions` lint when encountering a `#[macro_export]` at top-level doctest.
So instead of a non-sentential help suggestion to move the `macro_rules!` up above the `rustdoc`-generated function. We now suggest users to declare their own function.
Fixes *(partially, needs backport)* #124534
Remove many `#[macro_use] extern crate foo` items
This requires the addition of more `use` items, which often make the code more verbose. But they also make the code easier to read, because `#[macro_use]` obscures where macros are defined.
r? `@fee1-dead`
[Refactor] Rename `Lint` and `LintGroup`'s `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded`
The field being named `is_loaded` was very confusing. Turns out it's true for lints that are registered by external tools like Clippy (I had to look at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116412 to know what the variable meant). So I renamed `is_loaded` to `is_externally_loaded` and added some docs.
Couldn't find documentation supporting that single-variant
`#[repr(Rust)]` enums with RHS assigned work as expected with this
change.
```rust
enum Variants {
A = 17,
} // Would this be zero sized optimized guaranteed?
```
panic_str only exists for the migration to 2021 panic macros
The only caller is `expect_failed`, which is already a cold inline(never) function, so inlining into that function should be fine. (And indeed `panic_str` was `#[inline]` anyway.)
The existence of panic_str risks someone calling it when they should call `panic` instead, and I can't see a reason why this footgun should exist.
I also extended the comment in `panic` to explain why it needs a `'static` string -- I know I've wondered about this in the past and it took me quite a while to understand.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #123680 (Deny gen keyword in `edition_2024_compat` lints)
- #124057 (Fix ICE when ADT tail has type error)
- #124168 (Use `DefiningOpaqueTypes::Yes` in rustdoc, where the `InferCtxt` is guaranteed to have no opaque types it can define)
- #124197 (Move duplicated code in functions in `tests/rustdoc-gui/notable-trait.goml`)
- #124200 (Improve handling of expr->field errors)
- #124220 (Miri: detect wrong vtables in wide pointers)
- #124266 (remove an unused type from the reentrant lock tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Deny gen keyword in `edition_2024_compat` lints
Splits the `keyword_idents` lint into two -- `keyword_idents_2018` and `keyword_idents_2024` -- since each corresponds to a future-compat warning in a different edition. Group these together into a new `keyword_idents` lint group, and add the latter to the `rust_2024_compatibility` so that `gen` is ready for the 2024 edition.
cc `@traviscross` `@ehuss`
Fix trait solver overflow with `non_local_definitions` lint
This PR fixes the trait solver overflow with the `non_local_definitions` lint reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123573 using the suggestion from `@lcnr:` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123573#issuecomment-2041348320 to use the next trait solver.
~~I have not (yet) tried to create a minimized repro~~ ``@compiler-errors`` did the minimization (thanks you) but I have manually tested on the `starlark-rust` project that it fixes the issue.
Fixes#123573
r? `@lcnr`
Stabilize checking of cfgs at compile-time: `--check-cfg` option
This PR stabilize the `--check-cfg` CLI option of `rustc` (and `rustdoc`) 🎉.
In particular this PR does two things:
1. it makes the `--check-cfg` option stable
2. and it moves the documentation to the stable books
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82450#issuecomment-1965328542Resolves#82450
``@rustbot`` labels +S-blocked +F-check-cfg
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Implement syntax for `impl Trait` to specify its captures explicitly (`feature(precise_capturing)`)
Implements `impl use<'a, 'b, T, U> Sized` syntax that allows users to explicitly list the captured parameters for an opaque, rather than inferring it from the opaque's bounds (or capturing *all* lifetimes under 2024-edition capture rules). This allows us to exclude some implicit captures, so this syntax may be used as a migration strategy for changes due to #117587.
We represent this list of captured params as `PreciseCapturingArg` in AST and HIR, resolving them between `rustc_resolve` and `resolve_bound_vars`. Later on, we validate that the opaques only capture the parameters in this list.
We artificially limit the feature to *require* mentioning all type and const parameters, since we don't currently have support for non-lifetime bivariant generics. This can be relaxed in the future.
We also may need to limit this to require naming *all* lifetime parameters for RPITIT, since GATs have no variance. I have to investigate this. This can also be relaxed in the future.
r? `@oli-obk`
Tracking issue:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123432
Skip `unused_parens` report for `Paren(Path(..))` in macro.
fixes#120642
In following code, `unused_parens` suggest change `<($($rest),*)>::bar()` to `<$rest>::bar()` which will cause another err: `error: variable 'rest' is still repeating at this depth`：
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}
macro_rules! problem {
($ty:ident) => {
impl<$ty: Foo> Foo for ($ty,) {
fn bar() { <$ty>::bar() }
}
};
($ty:ident $(, $rest:ident)*) => {
impl<$ty: Foo, $($rest: Foo),*> Foo for ($ty, $($rest),*) {
fn bar() {
<$ty>::bar();
<($($rest),*)>::bar()
}
}
problem!($($rest),*);
}
}
```
I think maybe we can handle this by avoid warning for `Paren(Path(..))` in the macro. Is this reasonable approach?
Implement minimal, internal-only pattern types in the type system
rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107606
You can create pattern types with `std::pat::pattern_type!(ty is pat)`. The feature is incomplete and will panic on you if you use any pattern other than integral range patterns. The only way to create or deconstruct a pattern type is via `transmute`.
This PR's implementation differs from the MCP's text. Specifically
> This means you could implement different traits for different pattern types with the same base type. Thus, we just forbid implementing any traits for pattern types.
is violated in this PR. The reason is that we do need impls after all in order to make them usable as fields. constants of type `std::time::Nanoseconds` struct are used in patterns, so the type must be structural-eq, which it only can be if you derive several traits on it. It doesn't need to be structural-eq recursively, so we can just manually implement the relevant traits on the pattern type and use the pattern type as a private field.
Waiting on:
* [x] move all unrelated commits into their own PRs.
* [x] fix niche computation (see 2db07f94f44f078daffe5823680d07d4fded883f)
* [x] add lots more tests
* [x] T-types MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/126 to finish
* [x] some commit cleanup
* [x] full self-review
* [x] remove 61bd325da19a918cc3e02bbbdce97281a389c648, it's not necessary anymore I think.
* [ ] ~~make sure we never accidentally leak pattern types to user code (add stability checks or feature gate checks and appopriate tests)~~ we don't even do this for the new float primitives
* [x] get approval that [the scope expansion to trait impls](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326866-t-types.2Fnominated/topic/Pattern.20types.20types-team.23126/near/427670099) is ok
r? `@BoxyUwU`
