Remove unnecessary -fembed-bitcode usage now that it's deprecated
This is a partial revert of 6d819a4b8f because https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/812 removed this flag entirely, meaning we shouldn't have to pass this manually anymore
This replaces the hardcoded rustc-perf commit and ad-hoc downloading and
unpacking of its zipped source with defaulting to use the new rustc-perf
submodule.
While it would be nice to make `opt-dist` able to initialize the
submodule automatically when pointing to a Rust checkout _other_ than
the one opt-dist was built in, that would require a bigger refactor that
moved `update_submodule`, from bootstrap, into build_helper.
Regardless, I imagine it must be quite rare to use `opt-dist` with a
checkout that is neither from a rust-src tarball (which will contain the
submodule), nor the checkout opt-dist itself was built (bootstrap will
update the submodule when opt-dist is built).
This avoids having normal builds pay the cost of initializing that
submodule, while still ensuring it's available whenever `opt-dist` is
built.
Note that, at this point, `opt-dist` will not yet use the submodule,
that will be handled in a subsequent commit.
Currently, it's very challenging to perform a sandboxed `opt-dist`
bootstrap because the tool requires `rustc-perf` to be present, but
there is no proper management/tracking of it. Instead, a specific commit
is hardcoded where it is needed, and a non-checksummed zip is fetched
ad-hoc. This happens in two places:
`src/ci/docker/host-x86_64/dist-x86_64-linux/Dockerfile`:
```dockerfile
ENV PERF_COMMIT 4f313add609f43e928e98132358e8426ed3969ae
RUN curl -LS -o perf.zip https://ci-mirrors.rust-lang.org/rustc/rustc-perf-$PERF_COMMIT.zip && \
unzip perf.zip && \
mv rustc-perf-$PERF_COMMIT rustc-perf && \
rm perf.zip
```
`src/tools/opt-dist/src/main.rs`
```rust
// FIXME: add some mechanism for synchronization of this commit SHA with
// Linux (which builds rustc-perf in a Dockerfile)
// rustc-perf version from 2023-10-22
const PERF_COMMIT: &str = "4f313add609f43e928e98132358e8426ed3969ae";
let url = format!("https://ci-mirrors.rust-lang.org/rustc/rustc-perf-{PERF_COMMIT}.zip");
let client = reqwest::blocking::Client::builder()
.timeout(Duration::from_secs(60 * 2))
.connect_timeout(Duration::from_secs(60 * 2))
.build()?;
let response = retry_action(
|| Ok(client.get(&url).send()?.error_for_status()?.bytes()?.to_vec()),
"Download rustc-perf archive",
5,
)?;
```
This causes a few issues:
1. Maintainers need to be careful to bump PERF_COMMIT in both places
every time
2. In order to run `opt-dist` in a sandbox, you need to provide your own
`rustc-perf` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125125), but to
figure out which commit to provide you need to grep the Dockerfile
3. Even if you manage to provide the correct `rustc-perf`, its
dependencies are not included in the `vendor/` dir created during
`dist`, so it will fail to build from the published source tarballs
4. It is hard to provide any level of automation around updating the
`rustc-perf` in use, leading to staleness
Fundamentally, this means `rustc-src` tarballs no longer contain
everything you need to bootstrap Rust, and packagers hoping to leverage
`opt-dist` need to go out of their way to keep track of this "hidden"
dependency on `rustc-perf`.
This change adds rustc-perf as a git submodule, pinned to the current
`PERF_COMMIT` 4f313add609f43e928e98132358e8426ed3969ae. Subsequent
commits ensure the submodule is initialized when necessary, and make use
of it in `opt-dist`.
Fix `tests/debuginfo/strings-and-strs`.
It fails on my machine because it embeds pointer addresses in the expected output.
This commit replaces the addresses with `0x[...]`.
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
Make `EvalCtxt` generic over `InferCtxtLike`
...but don't change any of the impls, yet! These can get uplifted as we add more methods to `InferCtxtLike`/`Interner` :3
This is built on top of #125230.
r? lcnr
defrost `RUST_MIN_STACK=ice rustc hello.rs`
I didn't think too hard about testing my previous PR rust-lang/rust#122847 which makes our stack overflow handler assist people in discovering the `RUST_MIN_STACK` variable (which apparently is surprisingly useful for Really Big codebases). After it was merged, some useful comments left in a drive-by review led me to discover I had added an ICE. This reworks the code a bit to explain the rationale, remove the ICE that I introduced, and properly test one of the diagnostics.
fix suggestion in E0373 for !Unpin coroutines
Coroutines can be prefixed with the `static` keyword to make them
`!Unpin`.
However, given the following function:
```rust
fn check() -> impl Sized {
let x = 0;
#[coroutine]
static || {
yield;
x
}
}
```
We currently suggest prefixing `move` before `static`, which is
syntactically incorrect:
```
error[E0373]: coroutine may outlive the current function, but it borrows
...
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | static || {
| ^^^^^^^^^ may outlive borrowed value `x`
7 | yield;
8 | x
| - `x` is borrowed here
|
note: coroutine is returned here
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / static || {
7 | | yield;
8 | | x
9 | | }
| |_____^
help: to force the coroutine to take ownership of `x` (and any other
referenced variables), use the `move` keyword
| // this is syntactically incorrect, it should be `static move ||`
6 | move static || {
| ++++
```
This PR suggests adding `move` after `static` for these coroutines.
I also added a UI test for this case.
Never type unsafe lint improvements
- Move linting code to a separate method
- Remove mentions of `core::convert::absurd` (#124311 was rejected)
- Make the lint into FCW
The last thing is a bit weird though. On one hand it should be `EditionSemanticsChange(2024)`, but on the other hand it shouldn't, because we also plan to break it on all editions some time later. _Also_, it's weird that we don't have `FutureReleaseSemanticsChangeReportInDeps`, IMO "this might cause UB in a future release" is important enough to be reported in deps...
IMO we ought to have three enums instead of [`FutureIncompatibilityReason`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/enum.FutureIncompatibilityReason.html#):
```rust
enum IncompatibilityWhen {
FutureRelease,
Edition(Edition),
}
enum IncompatibilyWhat {
Error,
SemanticChange,
}
enum IncompatibilityReportInDeps {
No,
Yes,
}
```
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123748
Add `fn into_raw_with_allocator` to Rc/Arc/Weak.
Split out from #119761
Add `fn into_raw_with_allocator` for `Rc`/`rc::Weak`[^1]/`Arc`/`sync::Weak`.
* Pairs with `from_raw_in` (which already exists on all 4 types).
* Name matches `Box::into_raw_with_allocator`.
* Associated fns on `Rc`/`Arc`, methods on `Weak`s.
<details> <summary>Future PR/ACP</summary>
As a follow-on to this PR, I plan to make a PR/ACP later to move `into_raw(_parts)` from `Container<_, A: Allocator>` to only `Container<_, Global>` (where `Container` = `Vec`/`Box`/`Rc`/`rc::Weak`/`Arc`/`sync::Weak`) so that users of non-`Global` allocators have to explicitly handle the allocator when using `into_raw`-like APIs.
The current behaviors of stdlib containers are inconsistent with respect to what happens to the allocator when `into_raw` is called (which does not return the allocator)
| Type | `into_raw` currently callable with | behavior of `into_raw`|
| --- | --- | --- |
| `Box` | any allocator | allocator is [dropped](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/src/alloc/boxed.rs.html#1060) |
| `Vec` | any allocator | allocator is [forgotten](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/src/alloc/vec/mod.rs.html#884) |
| `Arc`/`Rc`/`Weak` | any allocator | allocator is [forgotten](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/alloc/sync.rs.html#1487)(Arc) [(sync::Weak)](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/alloc/sync.rs.html#2726) [(Rc)](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/alloc/rc.rs.html#1352) [(rc::Weak)](https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/alloc/rc.rs.html#2993) |
In my opinion, neither implicitly dropping nor implicitly forgetting the allocator is ideal; dropping it could immediately invalidate the returned pointer, and forgetting it could unintentionally leak memory. My (to-be) proposed solution is to just forbid calling `into_raw(_parts)` on containers with non-`Global` allocators, and require calling `into_raw_with_allocator`(/`Vec::into_raw_parts_with_alloc`)
</details>
[^1]: Technically, `rc::Weak::into_raw_with_allocator` is not newly added, as it was modified and renamed from `rc::Weak::into_raw_and_alloc`.
Use `throw_unsup_format!` instead of returning `ENOTSUP` in the mmap shim
I noticed this while trying to use `mmap` with `PROT_NONE`, which resulted in this error message:
```
Os { code: 95, kind: Uncategorized, message: "<unknown errnum in strerror_r: 95>" }
```
cc `@saethlin`
Update to LLVM 18.1.6
This rebases our LLVM fork on top of LLVM 18.1.6, which is planned to be the last release of the 18.x series.
Fixes#123695.
Fixes#125053.
r? `@cuviper`
An earlier commit included the change for a suggestion here.
Unfortunately, it also used unwrap instead of dying properly.
Roll out the ~~rice paper~~ EarlyDiagCtxt before we do anything that
might leave a mess.
