Cleanup `rustc_mir_build/../check_match.rs`
The file had become pretty unwieldy, with a fair amount of duplication. As a bonus, I discovered that we weren't running some pattern checks in if-let chains.
I recommend looking commit-by-commit. The last commit is a whim, I think it makes more sense that way but I don't hold this opinion strongly.
They've been deprecated for four years.
This commit includes the following changes.
- It eliminates the `rustc_plugin_impl` crate.
- It changes the language used for lints in
`compiler/rustc_driver_impl/src/lib.rs` and
`compiler/rustc_lint/src/context.rs`. External lints are now called
"loaded" lints, rather than "plugins" to avoid confusion with the old
plugins. This only has a tiny effect on the output of `-W help`.
- E0457 and E0498 are no longer used.
- E0463 is narrowed, now only relating to unfound crates, not plugins.
- The `plugin` feature was moved from "active" to "removed".
- It removes the entire plugins chapter from the unstable book.
- It removes quite a few tests, mostly all of those in
`tests/ui-fulldeps/plugin/`.
Closes#29597.
Fix incorrect trait bound restriction suggestion
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Pretty print `Fn` traits in `rustc_on_unimplemented`
I don't think that users really ever should need to think about `Fn*` traits' tupled args for a simple trait error.
r? diagnostics
Add all RPITITs when augmenting param-env with GAT bounds in `check_type_bounds`
When checking that associated type definitions actually satisfy their associated type bounds in `check_type_bounds`, we construct a "`normalize_param_env`" which adds a projection predicate that allows us to assume that we can project the GAT to the definition we're checking. For example, in:
```rust
type Foo {
type Bar: Display = i32;
}
```
We would add `<Self as Foo>::Bar = i32` as a projection predicate when checking that `i32: Display` holds.
That `normalize_param_env` was, for some reason, only being used to normalize the predicate before it was registered. This is sketchy, because a nested obligation may require the GAT bound to hold, and also the projection cache is broken and doesn't differentiate projection cache keys that differ by param-envs 😿.
This `normalize_param_env` is also not sufficient when we have nested RPITITs and default trait methods, since we need to be able to assume we can normalize both the RPITIT and all of its child RPITITs to sufficiently prove all of its bounds. This is the cause of #117104, which only starts to fail for RPITITs that are nested 3 and above due to the projection-cache bug above.[^1]
## First fix
Use the `normalize_param_env` everywhere in `check_type_bounds`. This is reflected in a test I've constructed that fixes a GAT-only failure.
## Second fix
For RPITITs, install projection predicates for each RPITIT in the same function in `check_type_bounds`. This fixes#117104.
not sure who to request, so...
r? `@lcnr` hehe feel free to reassign :3
[^1]: The projection cache bug specifically occurs because we try normalizing the `assumed_wf_types` with the non-normalization param-env. This causes us to insert a projection cache entry that keeps the outermost RPITIT rigid, and it trivially satisifes all its own bounds. Super sketchy![^2]
[^2]: I haven't actually gone and fixed the projection cache bug because it's only marginally related, but I could, and it should no longer be triggered here.
Suggest
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait<T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/restrict-assoc-type-of-generic-bound.rs:9:12
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait, B>(a: A) -> B {
| - - expected `B` because of return type
| |
| expected this type parameter
LL | return a.bar();
| ^^^^^^^ expected type parameter `B`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type parameter `B`
found associated type `<A as MyTrait>::T`
help: consider further restricting this bound
|
LL | pub fn foo<A: MyTrait + <T = B>, B>(a: A) -> B {
| +++++++++
```
Fix#117501.
Remove support for alias `-Z symbol-mangling-version`
(This is very similar to the removal of `-Z instrument-coverage` in #117111.)
`-C symbol-mangling-version` was stabilized back in rustc 1.59.0 (2022-02-24) via #90128, with the old unstable flag kept around (with a warning) as an alias to ease migration.
Clarify `Unsize` documentation
The documentation erroneously says that:
```rust
/// - Types implementing a trait `Trait` also implement `Unsize<dyn Trait>`.
/// - Structs `Foo<..., T, ...>` implement `Unsize<Foo<..., U, ...>>` if all of these conditions
/// are met:
/// - `T: Unsize<U>`.
/// - Only the last field of `Foo` has a type involving `T`.
/// - `Bar<T>: Unsize<Bar<U>>`, where `Bar<T>` stands for the actual type of that last field.
```
Specifically, `T: Unsize<U>` is not required to hold -- only the final field must implement `FinalField<T>: Unsize<FinalField<U>>`. This can be demonstrated by the test I added.
---
Second commit fleshes out the documentation a lot more.
Don't check for alias bounds in liveness when aliases have escaping bound vars
I actually have no idea how we *should* be treating aliases with escaping bound vars here... but the simplest behavior is just doing what we used to do before.
r? aliemjay
Fixes#117455
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming
If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.
Fix#72298.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Match usize/isize exhaustively with half-open ranges
The long-awaited finale to the saga of [exhaustiveness checking for integers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50912)!
```rust
match 0usize {
0.. => {} // exhaustive!
}
match 0usize {
0..usize::MAX => {} // helpful error message!
}
```
Features:
- Half-open ranges behave as expected for `usize`/`isize`;
- Trying to use `0..usize::MAX` will tell you that `usize::MAX..` is missing and explain why. No more unhelpful "`_` is missing";
- Everything else stays the same.
This should unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854.
Review-wise:
- I recommend looking commit-by-commit;
- This regresses perf because of the added complexity in `IntRange`; hopefully not too much;
- I measured each `#[inline]`, they all help a bit with the perf regression (tho I don't get why);
- I did not touch MIR building; I expect there's an easy PR there that would skip unnecessary comparisons when the range is half-open.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116267 (Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks)
- #116712 (When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers)
- #117416 (Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted)
- #117421 (coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions)
- #117438 (Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted
Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.
Happy to iterate on this.
Fixes#117413
r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
Store #[deprecated] attribute's `since` value in parsed form
This PR implements the first followup bullet listed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117148#issue-1960240108.
We centralize error handling to the attribute parsing code in `compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs`, and thereby remove some awkward error codepaths from later phases of compilation that had to make sense of these #\[deprecated\] attributes, namely `compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs` and `compiler/rustc_middle/src/middle/stability.rs`.
Detect object safety errors when assoc type is missing
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit
an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing
associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different
errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is
impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116862 (Detect when trait is implemented for type and suggest importing it)
- #117389 (Some diagnostics improvements of `gen` blocks)
- #117396 (Don't treat closures/coroutine types as part of the public API)
- #117398 (Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness)
- #117403 (Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it)
- #117411 (Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds)
- #117414 (Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit
Currently, we will normalize `Opaque := Option<&Opaque>` to something like `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>`, hitting a limit and bottoming out in an unnormalized opaque after the recursion limit gets hit.
Unfortunately, during `layout_of`, we'll simply recurse and try again if the type normalizes to something different than the type:
e6e931dda5/compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs (L58-L60)
That means then we'll try to normalize `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>` again, substituting `Opaque` into itself even deeper. Eventually this will get to the point that we're just stack-overflowing on a really deep type before even hitting an opaque again.
To fix this, we just bottom out into `ty::Error` instead of the unrevealed opaque type.
Fixes#117412
r? `@oli-obk`
Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds
* uses better spans
* clarifies a message that was only talking about generic params, but applies to `dyn ?Trait` and `impl ?Trait` as well
Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it
fixes#117379
Though if some code invokes typeck without having first invoked `check_well_formed` then we'll encounter this ICE again. This can happen in const and const fn bodies if they are evaluated due to other `check_well_formed` checks or similar
