Rename `~const Drop` to `~const Destruct`
r? `@oli-obk`
Completely switching to `~const Destructible` would be rather complicated, so it seems best to add it for now and wait for it to be backported to beta in the next release.
The rationale is to prevent complications such as #92149 and #94803 by introducing an entirely new trait. And `~const Destructible` reads a bit better than `~const Drop`. Name Bikesheddable.
Move std::sys::{mutex, condvar, rwlock} to std::sys::locks.
This cleans up the the std::sys modules a bit by putting the locks in a single module called `locks` rather than spread over the three modules `mutex`, `condvar`, and `rwlock`. This makes it easier to organise lock implementations, which helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740.
Add u16::is_utf16_surrogate
Right now, there are methods in the standard library for encoding and decoding UTF-16, but at least for the moment, there aren't any methods specifically for `u16` to help work with UTF-16 data. Since the full logic already exists, this wouldn't really add any code, just expose what's already there.
This method in particular is useful for working with the data returned by Windows `OsStrExt::encode_wide`. Initially, I was planning to also offer a `TryFrom<u16> for char`, but decided against it for now. There is plenty of code in rustc that could be rewritten to use this method, but I only checked within the standard library to replace them.
I think that offering more UTF-16-related methods to u16 would be useful, but I think this one is a good start. For example, one useful method might be `u16::is_pattern_whitespace`, which would check if something is the Unicode `Pattern_Whitespace` category. We can get away with this because all of the `Pattern_Whitespace` characters are in the basic multilingual plane, and hence we don't need to check for surrogates.
add perf side effect docs to `Iterator::cloned()`
Now that #90209 has been closed, as the current state of affairs is neither here nor there, this at least adds a paragraph + example on what to expect performance-wise and how to deal with it to the .cloned() docs.
cc `@the8472`
Fold aarch64 feature +fp into +neon
Arm's FEAT_FP and Feat_AdvSIMD describe the same thing on AArch64:
The Neon unit, which handles both floating point and SIMD instructions.
Moreover, a configuration for AArch64 must include both or neither.
Arm says "entirely proprietary" toolchains may omit floating point:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102374/0101/Data-processing---floating-point
In the Programmer's Guide for Armv8-A, Arm says AArch64 can have
both FP and Neon or neither in custom implementations:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/AArch64-Floating-point-and-NEON
In "Bare metal boot code for Armv8-A", enabling Neon and FP
is just disabling the same trap flag:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dai0527/a
In an unlikely future where "Neon and FP" become unrelated,
we can add "[+-]fp" as its own feature flag.
Until then, we can simplify programming with Rust on AArch64 by
folding both into "[+-]neon", which is valid as it supersets both.
"[+-]neon" is retained for niche uses such as firmware, kernels,
"I just hate floats", and so on.
I am... pretty sure no one is relying on this.
An argument could be made that, as we are not an "entirely proprietary" toolchain, we should not support AArch64 without floats at all. I think that's a bit excessive. However, I want to recognize the intent: programming for AArch64 should be simplified where possible. For x86-64, programmers regularly set up illegal feature configurations because it's hard to understand them, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89586. And per the above notes, plus the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86941, there should be no real use cases for leaving these features split: the two should in fact always go together.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95002.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95064.
- Fixesrust-lang/rust#95122.
Arm's FEAT_FP and Feat_AdvSIMD describe the same thing on AArch64:
The Neon unit, which handles both floating point and SIMD instructions.
Moreover, a configuration for AArch64 must include both or neither.
Arm says "entirely proprietary" toolchains may omit floating point:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102374/0101/Data-processing---floating-point
In the Programmer's Guide for Armv8-A, Arm says AArch64 can have
both FP and Neon or neither in custom implementations:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/AArch64-Floating-point-and-NEON
In "Bare metal boot code for Armv8-A", enabling Neon and FP
is just disabling the same trap flag:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dai0527/a
In an unlikely future where "Neon and FP" become unrelated,
we can add "[+-]fp" as its own feature flag.
Until then, we can simplify programming with Rust on AArch64 by
folding both into "[+-]neon", which is valid as it supersets both.
"[+-]neon" is retained for niche uses such as firmware, kernels,
"I just hate floats", and so on.
Preserve the Windows `GetLastError` error in `HandleOrInvalid`.
In the `TryFrom<HandleOrInvalid> for OwnedHandle` and
`TryFrom<HandleOrNull> for OwnedHandle` implemenations, `forget` the
owned handle on the error path, to avoid calling `CloseHandle` on an
invalid handle. It's harmless, except that it may overwrite the
thread's `GetLastError` error.
r? `@joshtriplett`
In the `TryFrom<HandleOrInvalid> for OwnedHandle` and
`TryFrom<HandleOrNull> for OwnedHandle` implemenations, `forget` the
owned handle on the error path, to avoid calling `CloseHandle` on an
invalid handle. It's harmless, except that it may overwrite the
thread's `GetLastError` error.
Skip a test if symlink creation is not possible
If someone running tests on Windows does not have Developer Mode enabled then creating symlinks will fail which in turn would cause this test to fail. This can be a stumbling block for contributors.
BTreeMap::entry: Avoid allocating if no insertion
This PR allows the `VacantEntry` to borrow from an empty tree with no root, and to lazily allocate a new root node when the user calls `.insert(value)`.
Provide more useful documentation of conversion methods
I thought that the documentation for these methods needed to be a bit more explanatory for new users. For advanced users, the comments are relatively unnecessary. I think it would be useful to explain precisely what the method does. As a new user, when you see the `into` method, where the type is inferred, if you are new you don't even know what you convert to, because it is implicit. I believe this can help new users understand.
remove_dir_all: use fallback implementation on Miri
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1966
The new implementation requires `openat`, `unlinkat`, and `fdopendir`. These cannot easily be shimmed in Miri since libstd does not expose APIs corresponding to them. So for now it is probably easiest to just use the fallback code in Miri. Nobody should run Miri as root anyway...
Relax tests for Windows dos device names
Windows 11 no longer turn paths ending with dos device names into device paths.
E.g. `C:\path\to\COM1.txt` used to get turned into `\\.\COM1`. Whereas now this path is left as is.
Note though that if the given path is an exact (case-insensitive) match for the string `COM1` then it'll still be converted to `\\.\COM1`.
Add a `process_group` method to UNIX `CommandExt`
- Tracking issue: #93857
- RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3228
Add a `process_group` method to `std::os::unix::process::CommandExt` that
allows setting the process group id (i.e. calling `setpgid`) in the child, thus
enabling users to set process groups while leveraging the `posix_spawn` fast
path.
I thought that the documentation for these methods needed to be a bit more explanatory for new users. For advanced users, the comments are relatively unnecessary. I think it would be useful to explain precisely what the method does. As a new user, when you see the `into` method, where the type is inferred, if you are new you don't even know what you convert to, because it is implicit. I believe this can help new users understand.
add `CStr` method that accepts any slice containing a nul-terminated string
I haven't created an issue (tracking or otherwise) for this yet; apologies if my approach isn't correct. This is my first code contribution.
This change adds a member fn that converts a slice into a `CStr`; it is intended to be safer than `from_ptr` (which is unsafe and may read out of bounds), and more useful than `from_bytes_with_nul` (which requires that the caller already know where the nul byte is).
The reason I find this useful is for situations like this:
```rust
let mut buffer = [0u8; 32];
unsafe {
some_c_function(buffer.as_mut_ptr(), buffer.len());
}
let result = CStr::from_bytes_with_nul(&buffer).unwrap();
```
This code above returns an error with `kind = InteriorNul`, because `from_bytes_with_nul` expects that the caller has passed in a slice with the NUL byte at the end of the slice. But if I just got back a nul-terminated string from some FFI function, I probably don't know where the NUL byte is.
I would wish for a `CStr` constructor with the following properties:
- Accept `&[u8]` as input
- Scan for the first NUL byte and return the `CStr` that spans the correct sub-slice (see [future note below](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94984#issuecomment-1070754281)).
- Return an error if no NUL byte is found within the input slice
I asked on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/CStr.20from.20.26.5Bu8.5D.20without.20knowing.20the.20NUL.20location.3F) whether this sounded like a good idea, and got a couple of positive-sounding responses from ``@joshtriplett`` and ``@AzureMarker.``
This is my first draft, so feedback is welcome.
A few issues that definitely need feedback:
1. Naming. ``@joshtriplett`` called this `from_bytes_with_internal_nul` on Zulip, but after staring at all of the available methods, I believe that this function is probably what end users want (rather than the existing fn `from_bytes_with_nul`). Giving it a simpler name (**`from_bytes`**) implies that this should be their first choice.
2. Should I add a similar method on `CString` that accepts `Vec<u8>`? I'd assume the answer is probably yes, but I figured I'd try to get early feedback before making this change bigger.
3. What should the error type look like? I made a unit struct since `CStr::from_bytes` can only fail in one obvious way, but if I need to do this for `CString` as well then that one may want to return `FromVecWithNulError`. And maybe that should dictate the shape of the `CStr` error type also?
Also, cc ``@poliorcetics`` who wrote #73139 containing similar fns.
Consistently present absent stdio handles on Windows as NULL handles.
This addresses #90964 by making the std API consistent about presenting
absent stdio handles on Windows as NULL handles. Stdio handles may be
absent due to `#![windows_subsystem = "windows"]`, due to the console
being detached, or due to a child process having been launched from a
parent where stdio handles are absent.
Specifically, this fixes the case of child processes of parents with absent
stdio, which previously ended up with `stdin().as_raw_handle()` returning
`INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`, which was surprising, and which overlapped with an
unrelated valid handle value. With this patch, `stdin().as_raw_handle()`
now returns null in these situation, which is consistent with what it
does in the parent process.
And, document this in the "Windows Portability Considerations" sections of
the relevant documentation.
Implement `Write for Cursor<[u8; N]>`, plus `A: Allocator` cursor support
This implements `Write for Cursor<[u8; N]>`, and also adds support for generic `A: Allocator` in `Box` and `Vec` cursors.
This was inspired by a user questioning why they couldn't write a `Cursor<[u8; N]>`:
https://users.rust-lang.org/t/why-vec-and-not-u8-makes-cursor-have-write/68210
Related history:
- #27197 switched `AsRef<[u8]>` for reading and seeking
- #67415 tried to use `AsMut<[u8]>` for writing, but did not specialize `Vec`.
Update stdlib for the l4re target
This PR contains the work by ``@humenda`` and myself to update standard library support for the x86_64-unknown-l4re-uclibc tier 3 target, split out from humenda/rust as requested in #85967. The changes have been rebased on current master and updated in follow up commits by myself. The publishing of the changes is authorized and preferred by the original author. To preserve attribution, when standard library changes were introduced as part of other changes to the compiler, I have kept the changes concerning the standard library and altered the commit messages as indicated. Any incompatibilities have been remedied in follow up commits, so that the PR as a whole should result in a clean update of the target.
Use verbatim paths for `process::Command` if necessary
In #89174, the standard library started using verbatim paths so longer paths are usable by default. However, `Command` was originally left out because of the way `CreateProcessW` was being called. This was changed as a side effect of #87704 so now `Command` paths can be converted to verbatim too (if necessary).
This adds a member fn that converts a slice into a CStr; it is intended
to be safer than from_ptr (which is unsafe and may read out of bounds),
and more useful than from_bytes_with_nul (which requires that the caller
already know where the nul byte is).
feature gate: cstr_from_bytes_until_nul
Also add an error type FromBytesUntilNulError for this fn.
Document that `Option<extern "abi" fn>` discriminant elision applies for any ABI
The current phrasing was not very clear on that aspect.
r? `@RalfJung`
`@rustbot` modify labels: A-docs A-ffi
Derive Eq for std::cmp::Ordering, instead of using manual impl.
This allows consts of type Ordering to be used in patterns, and with feature(adt_const_params) allows using `Ordering` as a const generic parameter.
Currently, `std::cmp::Ordering` implements `Eq` using a manually written `impl Eq for Ordering {}`, instead of `derive(Eq)`. This means that it does not implement `StructuralEq`.
This commit removes the manually written impl, and adds `derive(Eq)` to `Ordering`, so that it will implement `StructuralEq`.
Let `try_collect` take advantage of `try_fold` overrides
No public API changes.
With this change, `try_collect` (#94047) is no longer going through the `impl Iterator for &mut impl Iterator`, and thus will be able to use `try_fold` overrides instead of being forced through `next` for every element.
Here's the test added, to see that it fails before this PR (once a new enough nightly is out): https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=462f2896f2fed2c238ee63ca1a7e7c56
This might as well go to the same person as my last `try_process` PR (#93572), so
r? ``@yaahc``
