FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs
UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic
[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`
FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way
DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method
FIX - broken test
FIX - Rebase conflict
UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
On later stages, the feature is already stable.
Result of running:
rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
Suggested by the team in this Zulip Topic https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler
Handler already has almost all the capabilities of ParseSess when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access source_map from the emitter in order to get a Snippet and the start_point. Not sure if this is the best way to address this gap
This attribute allows to mark default body of a trait function as
unstable. This means that implementing the trait without implementing
the function will require enabling unstable feature.
This is useful in conjunction with `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`,
we may want to relax requirements for a trait, for example allowing
implementing either of `PartialEq::{eq, ne}`, but do so in a safe way
-- making implementation of only `PartialEq::ne` unstable.
If part of a feature is stabilized and a new feature is added for the
remaining parts, then the `implied_by` attribute can be used to indicate
which now-stable feature previously contained a item. If the now-stable
feature is still active (if the user has only just updated rustc, for
example) then there will not be an stability error for uses of the item
from the implied feature.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
When an unexpected meta item is provided to `#[stable]`, the diagnostic
lists "since" and "note" as expected meta-items, however the surrounding
code actually expects "feature" and "since".
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Always evaluate all cfg predicate in all() and any()
This pull-request adjust the handling of the `all()` and `any()` to always evaluate every cfg predicate because not doing so result in accepting incorrect `cfg`:
```rust
#[cfg(any(unix, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not on unix platform (but does on non unix platform)
fn foo1() {}
#[cfg(all(foo, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not
fn foo2() {}
#[cfg(all(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo3() {}
#[cfg(any(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo4() {}
```
This pull-request take the side to directly turn it into a hard error instead of having a future incompatibility lint because the combination to get this incorrect behavior is unusual and highly probable that some code have this without noticing.
A [search](https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=lang%3Arust+%2Fany%5C%28%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2C+%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%3A%3A%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%2F) on Github reveal no such instance nevertheless a Crater run should probably be done before merging this.
This was discover in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94175 when trying to lint on the second predicate. Also note that this seems to have being introduce with Rust 1.27.0: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KnfqKv15f.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Merge `#[deprecated]` and `#[rustc_deprecated]`
The first commit makes "reason" an alias for "note" in `#[rustc_deprecated]`, while still prohibiting it in `#[deprecated]`.
The second commit changes "suggestion" to not just be a feature of `#[rustc_deprecated]`. This is placed behind the new `deprecated_suggestion` feature. This needs a tracking issue; let me know if this PR will be approved and I can create one.
The third commit is what permits `#[deprecated]` to be used when `#![feature(staged_api)]` is enabled. This isn't yet used in stdlib (only tests), as it would require duplicating all deprecation attributes until a bootstrap occurs. I intend to submit a follow-up PR that replaces all uses and removes the remaining `#[rustc_deprecated]` code after the next bootstrap.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api +C-feature-request +A-attributes +S-waiting-on-review
