Amend option.take examples
It wasn't abundantly clear to me what `.take` returned. Perhaps this is a slightly frivolous change, but I think it's an improvement. =)
Apologies if I'm not following proper procedures.
It wasn't abundantly clear to me what `.take` returned. Perhaps this is a slightly frivolous change, but I think it's an improvement. =)
Apologies if I'm not following proper procedures.
New safe associated functions for PinMut
- Add safe `get_mut` and `map`
- Rename unsafe equivalents to `get_mut_unchecked` and `map_unchecked`
The discussion about this starts [in this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49150#issuecomment-399604573) on the tracking issue.
FusedIterator is a marker trait that promises that the implementing
iterator continues to return `None` from `.next()` once it has returned
`None` once (and/or `.next_back()`, if implemented).
The effects of FusedIterator are already widely available through
`.fuse()`, but with stable `FusedIterator`, stable Rust users can
implement this trait for their iterators when appropriate.
A user in a reddit thread was confused by the name of the variable
"num_as_int"; they thought the example was trying to convert the
string "10" as if it were binary 2 by calling str::len(). In reality,
the example is simply demonstrating how to take an immutable reference
to the value of an Option. The confusion comes from the coincidence
that the length of the string "10" is also its binary representation,
and the implication from the variable names that a conversion was
occuring ("num_as_str" to "num_as_int").
This PR changes the example number to 12 instead of 10, and changes
the variable name from "num_as_int" to "num_length" to better
communicate what the example is doing.
The reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/7zpvev/notyetawesome_rust_what_use_cases_would_you_like/dur39xw/
Add transpose conversions for nested Option and Result
These impls are useful when working with combinator
methods that expect an option or a result, but you
have a `Result<Option<T>, E>` instead of an `Option<Result<T, E>>`
or vice versa.
These impls are useful when working with combinator
methods that expect an option or a result, but you
have a Result<Option<T>, E> instead of an Option<Result<T, E>>
or vice versa.
Provide Entry-like API for Option
This implements #39288.
I am wondering whether to use std::intrinsics::unreachable!() here. Both seems fine to me (the second match optimizes away in release mode).
