`Split*::as_str` refactor
I've made this patch almost a year ago, so the rename and the behavior change are in one commit, sorry 😅
This fixes#84974, as it's required to make other changes work.
This PR
- Renames `as_str` method of string `Split*` iterators to `remainder` (it seems like the `as_str` name was confusing to users)
- Makes `remainder` return `Option<&str>`, to distinguish between "the iterator is exhausted" and "the tail is empty", this was [required on the tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77998#issuecomment-832696619)
r? `@m-ou-se`
Add notes and examples about non-intuitive `PathBuf::set_extension` behavior
Basically, passing the empty string will actually remove the extension instead of setting it to the empty string. This might change what is considered to be an extension. Additionally, passing an extension that contains dots will make the path only consider the last part of it to be the new extension.
Context is no longer Sync so this doesn't work.
error[E0277]: `*mut ()` cannot be shared between threads safely
--> library/core/tests/task.rs:24:21
|
24 | static CONTEXT: Context<'static> = Context::from_waker(&WAKER);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `*mut ()` cannot be shared between threads safely
|
= help: within `Context<'static>`, the trait `Sync` is not implemented for `*mut ()`
= note: required because it appears within the type `PhantomData<*mut ()>`
= note: required because it appears within the type `Context<'static>`
= note: shared static variables must have a type that implements `Sync`
Revert "Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint"
This is a clean revert of #105484.
I confirmed that reverting that PR fixes the regression reported in #106247. ~~I can't say I understand what this code is doing, but maybe it can be re-landed with a different implementation.~~ **Edit:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106247#issuecomment-1367174384 has an explanation of why #105484 ends up surfacing spurious `where_clause_object_safety` errors. The implementation of `where_clause_object_safety` assumes we only check whether a trait is object safe when somebody actually uses that trait with `dyn`. However the implementation of `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` added in the problematic PR involves checking *every* trait for whether it is object-safe.
FYI `@nbdd0121` `@compiler-errors`
Unify id-based thread parking implementations
Multiple platforms currently use thread-id-based parking implementations (NetBSD and SGX[^1]). Even though the strategy does not differ, these are duplicated for each platform, as the id is encoded into an atomic thread variable in different ways for each platform.
Since `park` is only called by one thread, it is possible to move the thread id into a separate field. By ensuring that the field is only written to once, before any other threads access it, these accesses can be unsynchronized, removing any restrictions on the size and niches of the thread id.
This PR also renames the internal `thread_parker` modules to `thread_parking`, as that name now better reflects their contents. I hope this does not add too much reviewing noise.
r? `@m-ou-se`
`@rustbot` label +T-libs
[^1]: SOLID supports this as well, I will switch it over in a follow-up PR.
Basically, passing the empty string will actually remove the extension
instead of setting it to the empty string. This might change what is
considered to be an extension. Additionally, passing an extension that
contains dots will make the path only consider the last part of it to be
the new extension.
Add #[inline] markers to once_cell methods
Added inline markers to all simple methods under the `once_cell` feature. Relates to #74465 and #105587
This should not block #105587
`IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` documentation.
Added documentation for IPv6 Addresses `IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` also known as `in6addr_any` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` also known as `in6addr_loopback` similar to `INADDR_ANY` for IPv4 Addresses.
Replace libstd, libcore, liballoc terminology in docs
Fixes#103551. I changed line comments containing the outdated terms as well.
It would be great if someone with more experience could weigh in on whether these changes introduce ambiguity as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103551#issuecomment-1291225315.
doc: clearer and more correct Iterator::scan
The `Iterator::scan` documentation seemed a little misleading to my newcomer
eyes, and this tries to address that.
* I found “similar to `fold`” unhelpful because (a) the similarity is only that
they maintain state between iterations, and (b) the _dissimilarity_ is no less
important: one returns a final value and the other an iterator. So this
replaces that with “which, like `fold`, holds internal state, but unlike
`fold`, produces a new iterator.
* I found “the return value from the closure, an `Option`, is yielded by the
iterator” to be downright incorrect, because “yielded by the iterator” means
“returned by the `next` method wrapped in `Some`”, so this implied that `scan`
would convert an input iterator of `T` to an output iterator of `Option<T>`.
So this replaces “yielded by the iterator” with “returned by the `next`
method” and elaborates: “Thus the closure can return `Some(value)` to yield
`value`, or `None` to end the iteration.”
* This also changes the example to illustrate the latter point by returning
`None` to terminate the iteration early based on `state`.
Catch panics/unwinding in destruction of TLS values
`destroy_value` is/can be called from C code (libc). Unwinding from Rust to C code is undefined behavior, which is why unwinding is caught here.
This problem caused an infinite loop inside the unwinding code when running `src/test/ui/threads-sendsync/issue-24313.rs` on a tier 3 target (QNX/Neutrino) on aarch64.
See also https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Infinite.20unwinding.20bug.
kmc-solid: Fix memory ordering in thread operations
Fixes two memory ordering issues in the thread state machine (`ThreadInner::lifecycle`) of the [`*-kmc-solid_*`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/kmc-solid.html) Tier 3 targets.
1. When detaching a thread that is still running (i.e., the owner updates `lifecycle` first, and the child updates it next), the first update did not synchronize-with the second update, resulting in a data race between the first update and the deallocation of `ThreadInner` by the child thread.
2. When joining on a thread, the joiner has to pass its own task ID to the joinee in order to be woken up later, but in doing so, it did not synchronize-with the read operation, creating possible sequences of execution where the joinee wakes up an incorrect or non-existent task.
Both issue are theoretical and most likely have never manifested in practice because of the stronger guarantees provided by the Arm memory model (particularly due to its barrier-based definition). Compiler optimizations could have subverted this, but the inspection of compiled code did not reveal such optimizations taking place.
Bump master bootstrap compiler
This PR bumps the bootstrap compiler to the beta created earlier this week, cherry-picks the stabilization version number updates, and updates the `cfg(bootstrap)`s.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
adjust message on non-unwinding panic
"thread panicked while panicking" is just plain wrong in case this is a non-unwinding panic, such as
- a panic out of a `nounwind` function
- the sanity checks we have in `mem::uninitialized` and `mem::zeroed`
- the optional debug assertion in various unsafe std library functions
Clarify `catch_unwind` docs about panic hooks
Makes it clear from `catch_unwind` docs that the panic hook will be called before the panic is caught.
Fixes#105432
Make sentinel value configurable in `library/std/src/sys_common/thread_local_key.rs`
This is an excerpt of a changeset for the QNX/Neutrino OS. To make the patch for QNX smaller and easier to review, I've extracted this change (which is OS independent). I would be surprised if no other OS is also affected.
All this patch does is to define a `const` for a sentinel value instead of using it directly at several places.
There are OSs that always return the lowest free value. The algorithm in `lazy_init` always avoids keys with the sentinel value.
In affected OSs, this means that each call to `lazy_init` will always request two keys from the OS and returns/frees the first one (with sentinel value) immediately afterwards.
By making the sentinel value configurable, affected OSs can use a different value than zero to prevent this performance issue.
On QNX/Neutrino, it is planned to use a different sentinel value:
```rust
// Define a sentinel value that is unlikely to be returned
// as a TLS key (but it may be returned).
#[cfg(not(target_os = "nto"))]
const KEY_SENTVAL: usize = 0;
// On QNX/Neutrino, 0 is always returned when currently not in use.
// Using 0 would mean to always create two keys and remote the first
// one (with value of 0) immediately afterwards.
#[cfg(target_os = "nto")]
const KEY_SENTVAL: usize = libc::PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX + 1;
```
It seems like no other OS defines `PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX` in Rusts libc, but `limits.h` on unix systems does.
available_parallelism: Gracefully handle zero value cfs_period_us
There seem to be some scenarios where the cgroup cpu quota field `cpu.cfs_period_us` can contain `0`. This field is used to determine the "amount" of parallelism suggested by the function `std:🧵:available_parallelism`
A zero value of this field cause a panic when `available_parallelism()` is invoked. This issue was detected by the call from binaries built by `cargo test`. I really don't feel like `0` is a good value for `cpu.cfs_period_us`, but I also don't think applications should panic if this value is seen.
This panic started happening with rust 1.64.0.
This case is gracefully handled by other projects which read this information: [num_cpus](e437b9d908/src/linux.rs (L207-L210)), [ninja](https://github.com/ninja-build/ninja/pull/2174/files), [dotnet](c4341d45ac/src/coreclr/pal/src/misc/cgroup.cpp (L481-L483))
Before this change, running `cargo test` in environments configured as described above would trigger this panic:
```
$ RUST_BACKTRACE=1 cargo test
Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 3.55s
Running unittests src/main.rs (target/debug/deps/x-9a42e145aca2934d)
thread 'main' panicked at 'attempt to divide by zero', library/std/src/sys/unix/thread.rs:546:70
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
2: core::panicking::panic
3: std::sys::unix:🧵:cgroups::quota
4: std::sys::unix:🧵:available_parallelism
5: std:🧵:available_parallelism
6: test::helpers::concurrency::get_concurrency
7: test::console::run_tests_console
8: test::test_main
9: test::test_main_static
10: x::main
at ./src/main.rs:1:1
11: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once
at /tmp/rust-1.64-1.64.0-1/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:248:5
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin x'
```
I've tested this change in an environment which has the bad (questionable?) setup and rebuilding the test executable against a fixed std library fixes the panic.
Move `ReentrantMutex` to `std::sync`
If I understand #84187 correctly, `sys_common` should not contain platform-independent code, even if it is private.
Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint
The lint detects when an object-safe trait has multiple supertraits.
Enabled in libcore and liballoc as they are low-level enough that many embedded programs will use them.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Fix backoff doc to match implementation
The commit 8dddb22943 in the crossbeam-channel PR (#93563) changed the backoff strategy to be quadratic instead of exponential. This updates the doc to prevent confusion.
