Clean up pr 104954
UI test filename typo fix and a simple comment rewording. Thanks.
CC `@vincenzopalazzo` (you spelled your name wrongly in the FIXME)
r? `@estebank`
Rustdoc-Json: Add tests for linking to foreign variants.
I initially taught these would be bugs, but it turn out they work perfectly, and the variant is added to paths.
Most of the work is done by jsondoclint checking all the ID's resolve (although this wont happen for links until #105015, which in turn is blocked on removing foreign traits), but we do check that neither the enum nor the variant is inlined, so it must be resolved correctly through paths.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
rustdoc: remove `fnname` CSS class that's styled exactly like `fn`
It's not obvious why this was ever a separate class name, since even in c4219a4783 when it was first added, it was styled identically to regular `fn` links.
Revert #104269 (to avoid spurious hang/test failure in CI)
Causes hangs/memory overflows in the test suite apparently 😢Reopens#104225Fixes#104957
r? ``@lcnr``
Document more settings for building rustc for Fuchsia
This documents that you need to link for Fuchsia with `lld` and provides configuration settings for both `clang` and `lld`. It also adjusts the documentation for running the test suite to recommend installing to a prefix.
r? ``@tmandry``
test-various: Add tests for {i686,aarch64}-unknown-uefi
This extends the existing test for x86_64-unknown-uefi to test the other two UEFI targets as well.
In `Expander::expand` the code currently uses `mk_attr_outer` to convert
a `MetaItem` to an `Attribute`, and then follows that with
`meta_item_list` which converts back. This commit avoids the unnecessary
conversions.
There was one wrinkle: the existing conversions caused the bogus `<>` on
`Default<>` to be removed. With the conversion gone, we get a second
error message about the `<>`. This is a rare case, so I think it
probably doesn't matter much.
`check_builtin_attribute` calls `parse_meta` to convert an `Attribute`
to a `MetaItem`, which it then checks. However, many callers of
`check_builtin_attribute` start with a `MetaItem`, and then convert it
to an `Attribute` by calling `cx.attribute(meta_item)`. This `MetaItem`
to `Attribute` to `MetaItem` conversion is silly.
This commit adds a new function `check_builtin_meta_item`, which can be
called instead from these call sites. `check_builtin_attribute` also now
calls it. The commit also renames `check_meta` as `check_attr` to better
match its arguments.
Assign myself for docs updates
This sets myself as the reviewer for docs submodule updates. Now with https://github.com/rust-lang/triagebot/pull/1673 automating the process, this piece of the puzzle handles the assignment step.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104804 (Rename `ast::Lit` as `ast::MetaItemLit`.)
- #104891 (Add documentation for `has_escaping_bound_vars`)
- #104933 (interpret: remove PartialOrd from a bunch of types that do not have or need a sensible order)
- #104936 (Ignore bivariant parameters in test_type_match.)
- #104954 (make simple check of prinf function)
- #104956 (Avoid ICE if the Clone trait is not found while building error suggestions)
- #104982 (interpret: get rid of run() function)
- #104998 (Update my mailmap)
- #105006 (stricter alignment enforcement for ScalarPair)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
It's not obvious why this was ever a separate class name, since even
in c4219a4783 when it was first added,
it was styled identically to regular `fn` links.
`mk_const(ty::ConstKind::X(...), ty)` can now be simplified to
`mk_cosnt(..., ty)`.
I searched with the following regex: \mk_const\([\n\s]*(ty::)?ConstKind\
I've left `ty::ConstKind::{Bound, Error}` as-is, they seem clearer this
way.
- Accept `impl Into`
- Implement `From<>` for `ConstKind`
Note: this adds a dependency on `derive_more` (MIT license). It allows
to derive a lot of traits (like `From` here) that would be otherwise
tedious to implement.
Add allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args config
Implement `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to change the behavior of the `uninlined_format_args` lint. Now it is a part of `style` per [Zulip chat](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/.60uninlined_format_args.60.20category), and won't propose inlining in case of a mixed usage, e.g. `print!("{} {}", var, 1+2)`. If the user sets `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to `false`, the lint would behave like it did before -- proposing to inline args even in the mixed case.
---
changelog: [`uninlined_format_args`]: Added a new config `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` to allow the lint, if only some arguments can be inlined
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
changelog: Moved [`uninlined_format_args`] to `style` (Now warn-by-default)
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
stricter alignment enforcement for ScalarPair
`@eddyb` [indicated](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103926#discussion_r1033315005) that alignment violating this check might be a bug. So let's see what the test suite says.
(Only the 2nd commit actually changes behavior... but I couldn't not do that other cleanup.^^)
Does the PR CI runner even enable debug assertions though...?
make simple check of prinf function
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92898
With this commit we start to make some simple
check when the name resolution fails, and
we generate some helper messages in case the
name is a C name like in the case of the `printf`
and suggest the correct rust method.
`@rustbot` r? `@pnkfelix`
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Ignore bivariant parameters in test_type_match.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103491 made opaque types bivariant with respect of some of their lifetime parameters. Because of this bivariance, some lifetime variables were not unified to anything during borrowck, and were considered as unequal by borrowck type test.
This PR makes type test ignore the bivariant parameters in test_type_match.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104815
r? `@oli-obk`
