Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116862 (Detect when trait is implemented for type and suggest importing it)
- #117389 (Some diagnostics improvements of `gen` blocks)
- #117396 (Don't treat closures/coroutine types as part of the public API)
- #117398 (Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness)
- #117403 (Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it)
- #117411 (Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds)
- #117414 (Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
When we encounter a `dyn Trait` that isn't object safe, look for its
implementors. If there's one, mention using it directly If there are
less than 9, mention the possibility of creating a new enum and using
that instead.
Account for object unsafe `impl Trait on dyn Trait {}`. Make a
distinction between public and sealed traits.
Fix#80194.
Suggest `pin!()` instead of `Pin::new()` when appropriate
When encountering a type that needs to be pinned but that is `!Unpin`, suggest using the `pin!()` macro.
Fix#57994.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `x` found for struct `Pin<&S>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:11:18
|
LL | Pin::new(&S).x();
| ^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `y`
|
note: method is available for `Pin<&mut S>`
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:6:5
|
LL | fn x(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Related to #57994, as one of the presented cases can lead to code like
this.
Make `unused_allocation` lint against `Box::new` too
Previously it only linted against `box` syntax, which likely won't ever be stabilized, which is pretty useless. Even now I'm not sure if it's a meaningful lint, but it's at least something 🤷
This means that code like the following will be linted against:
```rust
Box::new([1, 2, 3]).len();
f(&Box::new(1)); // where f : &i32 -> ()
```
The lint works by checking if a `Box::new` (or `box`) expression has an a borrow adjustment, meaning that the code that first stores the box in a variable won't be linted against:
```rust
let boxed = Box::new([1, 2, 3]); // no lint
boxed.len();
```
impl DispatchFromDyn for Cell and UnsafeCell
After some fruitful discussion on [Internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell-2/16520) here's my first PR to rust-lang/rust 🎉
Please let me know if there's something I missed.
This adds `DispatchFromDyn` impls for `Cell`, `UnsafeCell` and `SyncUnsafeCell`.
An existing test is also expanded to test the `Cell` impl (which requires the `UnsafeCell` impl)
The different `RefCell` types can not implement `DispatchFromDyn` since they have more than one (non ZST) field.
**Edit:**
### What:
These changes allow one to make types like `MyRc`(code below), to be object safe method receivers after implementing `DispatchFromDyn` and `Deref` for them.
This allows for code like this:
```rust
struct MyRc<T: ?Sized>(Cell<NonNull<RcBox<T>>>);
/* impls for DispatchFromDyn, CoerceUnsized and Deref for MyRc*/
trait Trait {
fn foo(self: MyRc<Self>);
}
let impls_trait = ...;
let rc = MyRc::new(impls_trait) as MyRc<dyn Trait>;
rc.foo();
```
Note: `Cell` and `UnsafeCell` won't directly become valid method receivers since they don't implement `Deref`. Making use of these changes requires a wrapper type and nightly features.
### Why:
A custom pointer type with interior mutability allows one to store extra information in the pointer itself.
These changes allow for such a type to be a method receiver.
### Examples:
My use case is a cycle aware custom `Rc` implementation that when dropping a cycle marks some references dangling.
On the [forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell/14762/8) andersk mentioned that they track if a `Gc` reference is rooted with an extra bit in the reference itself.
