Stop using `BREAK` & `CONTINUE` in compiler
Switching them to `Break(())` and `Continue(())` instead.
Entirely search-and-replace, though there's one spot where rustfmt insisted on a reformatting too.
libs-api would like to remove these constants (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102697#issuecomment-1385705202), so stop using them in compiler to make the removal PR later smaller.
Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux)
Based on #106718, so the diff is hard to read without it. See [here](98700cf481...compiler-errors:rust:new-solver-new-candidates-2) for an easier view until that one lands.
Of note:
* 44af916020fb43c12070125c45b6dee4ec303bbc fixes a bug where we need to make the query response *inside* of a probe, or else we make no inference progress (I think)
* 50daad5acd2f163d03e7ffab942534f09bc36e2e implements `consider_assumption` for traits and predicates. I'm not sure if using `sup` here is necessary or if `eq` is fine.
* We decided that all of the `instantiate_constituent_tys_for_*` functions are verbose but ok, since they need to be exhaustive and the logic between each of them is not similar enough, right?
r? ``@lcnr``
Do not filter substs in `remap_generic_params_to_declaration_params`.
The relevant filtering should have been performed by borrowck.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105826
r? types
finish trait solver skeleton work
### 648d661b4e0fcf55f7082894f577377eb451db4b
The previous implementation didn't remove provisional entries which depended on the current goal if we're forced to rerun in case the provisional result of that entry is different from the new result. For reference, see https://rust-lang.github.io/chalk/book/recursive/search_graph.html.
We should also treat inductive cycles as overflow, not ordinary ambiguity.
### 219a5de2517cebfe20a2c3417bd302f7c12db70c 6a1912be539dd5a3b3c10be669787c4bf0c1868a
These two commits move canonicalization to the start of the queries which simplifies a bunch of stuff. I originally intended to keep stuff canonicalized for a while because I expected us to add a additional caches the trait solver, either for candidate assembly or for projections. We ended up not adding (and expect to not need) any of them so this just ends up being easier to understand.
### d78d5ad0979e965afde6500bccfa119b47063506
adds a special `eq` for the solver which doesn't care about obligations or spans
### 18704e6a78b7703e1bbb3856f015cb76c0a07a06
implements https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/364551-t-types.2Ftrait-system-refactor/topic/projection.20cache
r? `@compiler-errors`
Switching them to `Break(())` and `Continue(())` instead.
libs-api would like to remove these constants, so stop using them in compiler to make the removal PR later smaller.
dont randomly use `_` to print out const generic arguments
const generics seem to get printed out as `_` for no reason a lot of the time, as someone who spends a lot of time with const generics this has gotten ✨ very annoying ✨. Latest example would be #106423 where the ICE messaged formatted a `ty::Const` containing no infer vars, as `_`.
For some reason printing of the const argument on arrays was custom instead of using the existing logic for printing `ty::Const`. Additionally the existing logic for printing `ty::Const` would print out `_` for anon consts that are in a separate crate leading to weird diagnostics (see second commit). There ought to be less cases of consts randomly getting printed as `_` hiding valuable info now.
Add 'static lifetime suggestion when GAT implied 'static requirement from HRTB
Fix for issue #105507
The problem:
When generic associated types (GATs) are from higher-ranked trait bounds (HRTB), they are implied 'static requirement (see
[Implied 'static requirement from higher-ranked trait bounds](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/10/28/gats-stabilization.html#implied-static-requirement-from-higher-ranked-trait-bounds) for more details). If the user did not explicitly specify the `'static` lifetime when using the GAT, the current error message will only point out the type `does not live long enough` where the type is used, but not where the GAT is specified and how to fix the problem.
The solution:
Add notes at the span where the problematic GATs are specified and suggestions of how to fix the problem by adding `'static` lifetime at the right spans.
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `item_bounds` query
Part of the work to finish #105779 (also see https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/78).
Several queries `X` have a `bound_X` variant that wraps the output in `EarlyBinder`. This adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `item_bounds` query and removes `bound_item_bounds`.
r? `@lcnr`
Document wf constraints on control flow in cleanup blocks
Was recently made aware of [this code](a377893da2/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs (L247-L368)), which has this potential ICE: a377893da2/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/analyze.rs (L308-L314)
Roughly speaking, the code there is attempting to partition the cleanup blocks into funclets that satisfy a "unique successor" property, and the ICE is set off if that's not possible. This PR documents the well-formedness constraints that MIR must satisfy to avoid setting off that ICE.
The constraints documented are slightly stronger than the cases in which the ICE would have been set off in that code. This is necessary though, since whether or not that ICE gets set off can depend on iteration order in some graphs.
This sort of constraint is kind of ugly, but I don't know a better alternative at the moment. It's worth knowing that two important optimizations are still correct:
- Removing edges in the cfg: Fewer edges => fewer paths => stronger dominance relations => more contractions, and more contractions can't turn a forest into not-a-forest.
- Contracting an edge u -> v when u only has one successor and v only has one predecessor: u already dominated v, so this contraction was going to happen anyway.
There is definitely a MIR opt somewhere that can run afoul of this, but I don't know where it is. `@saethlin` was able to set it off though, so maybe he'll be able to shed some light on it.
r? `@RalfJung` I suppose, and cc `@tmiasko` who might have insight/opinions on this
Document `EarlyBinder::subst_identity` and `skip_binder`
Finishing implementing #105779 will change several commonly used queries to return `EarlyBinder` by default. This PR adds documentation for two of the methods used to access data inside the `EarlyBinder`. I tried to summarize some of the [discussion from the issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105779#issuecomment-1375512647) in writing this.
r? `@lcnr`
Unify `Opaque`/`Projection` handling in region outlives code
They share basically identical paths in most places which are even easier to unify now that they're both `ty::Alias`
r? types
Rework some `predicates_of`/`{Generic,Instantiated}Predicates` code
1. Make `instantiate_own` return an iterator, since it's a bit more efficient and easier to work with
2. Remove `bound_{explicit,}_predicates_of` -- these `bound_` methods in particular were a bit awkward to work with since `ty::GenericPredicates` *already* acts kinda like an `EarlyBinder` with its own `instantiate_*` methods, and had only a few call sites anyways.
3. Implement `IntoIterator` for `InstantiatedPredicates`, since it's *very* commonly being `zip`'d together.
Implement some FIXME methods in the new trait solver
Implement just enough of the solver's response logic to make it not ICE.
Also, fix a bug with `no_bound_vars` call failing due to canonical bound vars.
r? `@lcnr`
Rename `Ty::is_ty_infer` -> `Ty::is_ty_or_numeric_infer`
Makes sure people are aware that they may have a type variable *or* an int/float variable.
r? `@oli-obk` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106322#issuecomment-1376913539 but I could instead implement your solution, let me know.
(This will conflict with #106322 for now, ignore that 😄)
