Apply size optimizations to panic machinery and some cold functions
* std dependencies gimli and addr2line are now built with opt-level=s
* various panic-related methods and `#[cold]` methods are now marked `#[optimize(size)]`
Panics should be cold enough that it doesn't make sense to optimize them for speed. The only tradeoff here is if someone does a lot of backtrace captures (without panics) and printing then the opt-level change might impact their perf.
Seems to be the first use of the optimize attribute. Tracking issue #54882
A partial stabilization that only affects:
- AllocType<T>::new_uninit
- AllocType<T>::assume_init
- AllocType<[T]>::new_uninit_slice
- AllocType<[T]>::assume_init
where "AllocType" is Box, Rc, or Arc
- `new_zeroed` variants move to `new_zeroed_alloc`
- the `write` fn moves to `box_uninit_write`
The remainder will be stabilized in upcoming patches, as
it was decided to only stabilize `uninit*` and `assume_init`.
CloneToUninit impls
As per #126799.
Also implements it for `Wtf8` and both versions of `os_str::Slice`.
Maybe it is worth to slap `#[inline]` on some of those impls.
r? `@dtolnay`
Clean and enable `rustdoc::unescaped_backticks` for `core/alloc/std/test/proc_macro`
I am not sure if the lint is supposed to be "ready enough" (since it is `allow` by default), but it does catch a couple issues in `core` (`alloc`, `std`, `test` and `proc_macro` are already clean), so I propose making it `warn` in all the crates rendered in the website.
Cc: `@GuillaumeGomez`
- Update system table crc32
- Fix unsound use of Box
- Free exit data
- Code improvements
- Introduce OwnedTable
- Update r-efi to latest version
- Use extended_varargs_abi_support for
install_multiple_protocol_interfaces and
uninstall_multiple_protocol_interfaces
- Fix comments
- Stub out args implementation
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>
Clean up more comments near use declarations
#125443 will reformat all use declarations in the repository. There are a few edge cases involving comments on use declarations that require care. This PR fixes them up so #125443 can go ahead with a simple `x fmt --all`. A follow-up to #126717.
r? ``@cuviper``
There are some comments describing multiple subsequent `use` items. When
the big `use` reformatting happens some of these `use` items will be
reordered, possibly moving them away from the comment. With this
additional level of formatting it's not really feasible to have comments
of this type. This commit removes them in various ways:
- merging separate `use` items when appropriate;
- inserting blank lines between the comment and the first `use` item;
- outright deletion (for comments that are relatively low-value);
- adding a separate "top-level" comment.
We also entirely skip formatting for four library files that contain
nothing but `pub use` re-exports, where reordering would be painful.
Stabilize `PanicInfo::message()` and `PanicMessage`
Resolves#66745
This stabilizes the [`PanicInfo::message()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/panic/struct.PanicInfo.html#method.message) and [`PanicMessage`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/panic/struct.PanicMessage.html).
Demonstration of [custom panic handler](https://github.com/StackOverflowExcept1on/panicker):
```rust
#![no_std]
#![no_main]
extern crate libc;
#[no_mangle]
extern "C" fn main() -> libc::c_int {
panic!("I just panic every time");
}
#[panic_handler]
fn my_panic(panic_info: &core::panic::PanicInfo) -> ! {
use arrayvec::ArrayString;
use core::fmt::Write;
let message = panic_info.message();
let location = panic_info.location().unwrap();
let mut debug_msg = ArrayString::<1024>::new();
let _ = write!(&mut debug_msg, "panicked with '{message}' at '{location}'");
if debug_msg.try_push_str("\0").is_ok() {
unsafe {
libc::puts(debug_msg.as_ptr() as *const _);
}
}
unsafe { libc::exit(libc::EXIT_FAILURE) }
}
```
```
$ cargo +stage1 run --release
panicked with 'I just panic every time' at 'src/main.rs:8:5'
```
- [x] FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66745#issuecomment-2198143725
r? libs-api
This is possible now that inline const blocks are stable; the idea was
even mentioned as an alternative when `uninit_array()` was added:
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65580#issuecomment-544200681>
> if it’s stabilized soon enough maybe it’s not worth having a
> standard library method that will be replaceable with
> `let buffer = [MaybeUninit::<T>::uninit(); $N];`
Const array repetition and inline const blocks are now stable (in the
next release), so that circumstance has come to pass, and we no longer
have reason to want `uninit_array()` other than convenience. Therefore,
let’s evaluate the inconvenience by not using `uninit_array()` in
the standard library, before potentially deleting it entirely.
Abort a process when FD ownership is violated
When an owned FD has already been closed before it's dropped that means something else touched an FD in ways it is not allowed to. At that point things can already be arbitrarily bad, e.g. clobbered mmaps. Recovery is not possible.
All we can do is hasten the fire.
Unlike the previous attempt in #124130 this shouldn't suffer from the possibility that FUSE filesystems can return arbitrary errors.
