Fixed the `private-dependency` bug
Fixed the private-dependency bug: If the directly dependent crate is loaded last and is not configured with `--extern`, it may be incorrectly set to `private-dependency`
Fixes#122756
Encode implied predicates for traits
In #112629, we decided to make associated type bounds in the "supertrait" AST position *implied* even though they're not supertraits themselves.
This means that the `super_predicates` and `implied_predicates` queries now differ for regular traits. The assumption that they didn't differ was hard-coded in #107614, so in cross-crate positions this means that we forget the implied predicates from associated type bounds.
This isn't unsound, just kind of annoying. This should be backported since associated type bounds are slated to stabilize for 1.78 -- either that, or associated type bounds can be reverted on beta and re-shipped in 1.79 with this patch.
Fixes#122859
CFI: Strip auto traits off Virtual calls
We already use `Instance` at declaration sites when available to glean additional information about possible abstractions of the type in use. This does the same when possible at callsites as well.
The primary purpose of this change is to allow CFI to alter how it generates type information for indirect calls through `Virtual` instances.
This is needed for the "separate machinery" version of my approach to the vtable issues (#122573), because we need to respond differently to a `Virtual` call to the same type as a non-virtual call, specifically [stripping auto traits off the receiver's `Self`](54b15b0c36) because there isn't a separate vtable for `Foo` vs `Foo + Send`.
This would also make a more general underlying mechanism that could be used by rcvalle's [proposed drop detection / encoding](edcd1e20a1) if we end up using his approach, as we could condition out on the `def_id` in the CFI code rather than requiring the generating code to explicitly note whether it was calling drop.
CFI: Support self_cell-like recursion
Current `transform_ty` attempts to avoid cycles when normalizing `#[repr(transparent)]` types to their interior, but runs afoul of this pattern used in `self_cell`:
```
struct X<T> {
x: u8,
p: PhantomData<T>,
}
#[repr(transparent)]
struct Y(X<Y>);
```
When attempting to normalize Y, it will still cycle indefinitely. By using a types-visited list, this will instead get expanded exactly one layer deep to X<Y>, and then stop, not attempting to normalize `Y` any further.
This PR was split off from #121962 as part of fixing the larger vtable compatibility issues.
r? ``````@workingjubilee``````
Mention Register Size in `#[warn(asm_sub_register)]`
Fixes#121593
Displays the register size information obtained from `suggest_modifier()` and `default_modifier()`.
Add test in higher ranked subtype
I'm a beginner in this repository, and there are some things I'm not sure about:
- Is it okay that there is a warning:
```
rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [?1t, '^0.Named(DefId(0:15 ~ structually_relate_aliases[de75]::{impl#1}::'a), "'a")], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ structually_relate_aliases[de75]::ToUnit::Unit) }
```
- Is it okay that there are two duplicate errors in the same line?
- Did I put the test in the right place?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Fixes#121649
Handle str literals written with `'` lexed as lifetime
Given `'hello world'` and `'1 str', provide a structured suggestion for a valid string literal:
```
error[E0762]: unterminated character literal
--> $DIR/lex-bad-str-literal-as-char-3.rs:2:26
|
LL | println!('hello world');
| ^^^^
|
help: if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes
|
LL | println!("hello world");
| ~ ~
```
```
error[E0762]: unterminated character literal
--> $DIR/lex-bad-str-literal-as-char-1.rs:2:20
|
LL | println!('1 + 1');
| ^^^^
|
help: if you meant to write a `str` literal, use double quotes
|
LL | println!("1 + 1");
| ~ ~
```
Fix#119685.
Additional trait bounds beyond the principal trait and its implications
are not possible in the vtable. This means that if a receiver is
`&dyn Foo + Send`, the function will only be expecting `&dyn Foo`.
This strips those auto traits off before CFI encoding.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #120577 (Stabilize slice_split_at_unchecked)
- #122698 (Cancel `cargo update` job if there's no updates)
- #122780 (Rename `hir::Local` into `hir::LetStmt`)
- #122915 (Delay a bug if no RPITITs were found)
- #122916 (docs(sync): normalize dot in fn summaries)
- #122921 (Enable more mir-opt tests in debug builds)
- #122922 (-Zprint-type-sizes: print the types of awaitees and unnamed coroutine locals.)
- #122927 (Change an ICE regression test to use the original reproducer)
- #122930 (add panic location to 'panicked while processing panic')
- #122931 (Fix some typos in the pin.rs)
- #122933 (tag_for_variant follow-ups)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Change an ICE regression test to use the original reproducer
The ICE was fixed in PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122370, but the test used a different reproducer than the one originally reported. This PR changes it to the original one, giving us more confidence that the fix works.
Fixes#122199
-Zprint-type-sizes: print the types of awaitees and unnamed coroutine locals.
This should assist comprehending the size of coroutines. In particular, whenever a future is suspended while awaiting another future, the latter is given the special name `__awaitee`, and now the type of the awaited future will be printed, allowing identifying caller/callee — er, I mean, poller/pollee — relationships.
It would be possible to include the type name in more cases, but I thought that that might be overly verbose (`print-type-sizes` is already a lot of text) and ordinary named fields or variables are easier for readers to discover the types of.
This change will also synergize with my other PR #122923 which changes type printing to print the path of the `async fn` instead of the span.
Implementation note: I'm not sure if `Symbol::intern` is appropriate for this application, but it was the obvious way to not have to remove the `Copy` implementation from `FieldInfo`, or add a `'tcx` lifetime, while avoiding keeping a lot of possibly redundant strings in memory. I don't know what the proper tradeoff to make here is (though presumably it is not too important for a `-Z` debugging option).
Let codegen decide when to `mem::swap` with immediates
Making `libcore` decide this is silly; the backend has so much better information about when it's a good idea.
Thus this PR introduces a new `typed_swap` intrinsic with a fallback body, and replaces that fallback implementation when swapping immediates or scalar pairs.
r? oli-obk
Replaces #111744, and means we'll never need more libs PRs like #111803 or #107140
This should assist comprehending the size of coroutines.
In particular, whenever a future is suspended while awaiting another
future, the latter is given the special name `__awaitee`, and now the
type of the awaited future will be printed, allowing identifying
caller/callee — er, I mean, poller/pollee — relationships.
It would be possible to include the type name in more cases, but I
thought that that might be overly verbose (`print-type-sizes` is already
a lot of text) and ordinary named fields or variables are easier for
readers to discover the types of.
Current `transform_ty` attempts to avoid cycles when normalizing
`#[repr(transparent)]` types to their interior, but runs afoul of this
pattern used in `self_cell`:
```
struct X<T> {
x: u8,
p: PhantomData<T>,
}
#[repr(transparent)]
struct Y(X<Y>);
```
When attempting to normalize Y, it will still cycle indefinitely. By
using a types-visited list, this will instead get expanded exactly
one layer deep to X<Y>, and then stop, not attempting to normalize `Y`
any further.
Suggest `_` for missing generic arguments in turbofish
The compiler may suggest unusable generic type names for missing generic arguments in an expression context:
```rust
fn main() {
(0..1).collect::<Vec>()
}
```
> help: add missing generic argument
>
> (0..1).collect::<Vec<T>>()
but `T` is not a valid name in this context, and this suggestion won't compile.
I've changed it to use `_` inside method calls (turbofish), so it will suggest `(0..1).collect::<Vec<_>>()` which _may_ compile.
It's possible that the suggested `_` will be ambiguous, but there is very extensive E0283 that will help resolve that, which is more helpful than a basic "cannot find type `T` in this scope" users would get otherwise.
Out of caution to limit scope of the change I've limited it to just turbofish, but I suspect `_` could be the better choice in more cases. Perhaps in all expressions?
Note that the caller chooses a type for type param
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/return-impl-trait.rs:23:5
|
LL | fn other_bounds<T>() -> T
| - -
| | |
| | expected `T` because of return type
| | help: consider using an impl return type: `impl Trait`
| expected this type parameter
...
LL | ()
| ^^ expected type parameter `T`, found `()`
|
= note: expected type parameter `T`
found unit type `()`
= note: the caller chooses the type of T which can be different from ()
```
Tried to see if "expected this type parameter" can be replaced, but that goes all the way to `rustc_infer` so seems not worth the effort and can affect other diagnostics.
Revives #112088 and #104755.
