Stabilize single-field offset_of
This PR stabilizes offset_of for a single field. There has been some further discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106655 about whether this is advisable; I'm opening the PR anyway so that the code is available.
LLVM 18 x86 data layout update
With https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 LLVM now has i128 aligned to 16-bytes on x86 based platforms. This will be in LLVM-18. This patch updates all our spec targets to be 16-byte aligned, and removes the alignment when speaking to older LLVM.
This results in Rust overaligning things relative to LLVM on older LLVMs.
This implements MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/683.
See #54341
Restrict access to the private field of newtype indexes
Well... we don't have the capability to forbid you to access private fields in the same module, and I don't want to add module shenanigans in the expansion of the macro. So... we just name the field creatively so that no one actually uses it.
Suggest `.swap()` when encountering conflicting borrows from `mem::swap` on a slice
This PR modifies the existing suggestion by matching on `[ProjectionElem::Deref, ProjectionElem::Index(_)]` instead of just `[ProjectionElem::Index(_)]`, which caused us to miss many cases. Additionally, it adds a more specific, machine-applicable suggestion in the case we determine `mem::swap` was used to swap elements in a slice.
Closes#102269
never_patterns: typecheck never patterns
This checks that a `!` pattern is only used on an uninhabited type (modulo match ergonomics, i.e. `!` is allowed on `&Void`).
r? `@compiler-errors`
Exhaustiveness: simplify empty pattern logic
The logic that handles empty patterns had gotten quite convoluted. This PR simplifies it a lot. I tried to make the logic as easy as possible to follow; this only does logically equivalent changes.
The first commit is a drive-by comment clarification that was requested after another PR a while back.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Stabilize `slice_first_last_chunk`
This PR does a few different things based around stabilizing `slice_first_last_chunk`. They are split up so this PR can be by-commit reviewed, I can move parts to a separate PR if desired.
This feature provides a very elegant API to extract arrays from either end of a slice, such as for parsing integers from binary data.
## Stabilize `slice_first_last_chunk`
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/69
Implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111774
This stabilizes the functionality from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111774:
```rust
impl [T] {
pub const fn first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
pub fn first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
pub const fn last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<&[T; N]>;
pub fn last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<&mut [T; N]>;
pub const fn split_first_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T; N], &[T])>;
pub fn split_first_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T; N], &mut [T])>;
pub const fn split_last_chunk<const N: usize>(&self) -> Option<(&[T], &[T; N])>;
pub fn split_last_chunk_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> Option<(&mut [T], &mut [T; N])>;
}
```
Const stabilization is included for all non-mut methods, which are blocked on `const_mut_refs`. This change includes marking the trivial function `slice_split_at_unchecked` const-stable for internal use (but not fully stable).
## Remove `split_array` slice methods
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091
Implementation: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83233#pullrequestreview-780315524
This PR also removes the following unstable methods from the `split_array` feature, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90091:
```rust
impl<T> [T] {
pub fn split_array_ref<const N: usize>(&self) -> (&[T; N], &[T]);
pub fn split_array_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> (&mut [T; N], &mut [T]);
pub fn rsplit_array_ref<const N: usize>(&self) -> (&[T], &[T; N]);
pub fn rsplit_array_mut<const N: usize>(&mut self) -> (&mut [T], &mut [T; N]);
}
```
This is done because discussion at #90091 and its implementation PR indicate a strong preference for nonpanicking APIs that return `Option`. The only difference between functions under the `split_array` and `slice_first_last_chunk` features is `Option` vs. panic, so remove the duplicates as part of this stabilization.
This does not affect the array methods from `split_array`. We will want to revisit these once `generic_const_exprs` is further along.
## Reverse order of return tuple for `split_last_chunk{,_mut}`
An unresolved question for #111774 is whether to return `(preceding_slice, last_chunk)` (`(&[T], &[T; N])`) or the reverse (`(&[T; N], &[T])`), from `split_last_chunk` and `split_last_chunk_mut`. It is currently implemented as `(last_chunk, preceding_slice)` which matches `split_last -> (&T, &[T])`. The first commit changes these to `(&[T], &[T; N])` for these reasons:
- More consistent with other splitting methods that return multiple values: `str::rsplit_once`, `slice::split_at{,_mut}`, `slice::align_to` all return tuples with the items in order
- More intuitive (arguably opinion, but it is consistent with other language elements like pattern matching `let [a, b, rest @ ..] ...`
- If we ever added a varidic way to obtain multiple chunks, it would likely return something in order: `.split_many_last::<(2, 4)>() -> (&[T], &[T; 2], &[T; 4])`
- It is the ordering used in the `rsplit_array` methods
I think the inconsistency with `split_last` could be acceptable in this case, since for `split_last` the scalar `&T` doesn't have any internal order to maintain with the other items.
## Unresolved questions
Do we want to reserve the same names on `[u8; N]` to avoid inference confusion? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117561#issuecomment-1793388647
---
`slice_first_last_chunk` has only been around since early 2023, but `split_array` has been around since 2021.
`@rustbot` label -T-libs +T-libs-api -T-libs +needs-fcp
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval,` `@scottmcm` who raised this topic, `@clarfonthey` implementer of `slice_first_last_chunk` `@jethrogb` implementer of `split_array`
Zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Stabilizing.20array-from-slice.20*something*.3FFixes: #111774
use implied bounds compat mode in MIR borrowck
cc
- #119956
- #118553
This should hopefully fix bevy 🤔 `cargo test` ends up freezing my computer though, cargo build went from err to ok however 😁
r? `@jackh726`
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118665 (Consolidate all associated items on the NonZero integer types into a single impl block per type)
- #118798 (Use AtomicU8 instead of AtomicUsize in backtrace.rs)
- #119062 (Deny braced macro invocations in let-else)
- #119138 (Docs: Use non-SeqCst in module example of atomics)
- #119907 (Update `fn()` trait implementation docs)
- #120083 (Warn when not having a profiler runtime means that coverage tests won't be run/blessed)
- #120107 (dead_code treats #[repr(transparent)] the same as #[repr(C)])
- #120110 (Update documentation for Vec::into_boxed_slice to be more clear about excess capacity)
- #120113 (Remove myself from review rotation)
- #120118 (Fix typo in documentation in base.rs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
With https://reviews.llvm.org/D86310 LLVM now has i128 aligned to
16-bytes on x86 based platforms. This will be in LLVM-18. This patch
updates all our spec targets to be 16-byte aligned, and removes the
alignment when speaking to older LLVM.
This results in Rust overaligning things relative to LLVM on older LLVMs.
This alignment change was discussed in rust-lang/compiler-team#683
See #54341 for additional information about why this is happening and
where this will be useful in the future.
This *does not* stabilize `i128`/`u128` for FFI.
dead_code treats #[repr(transparent)] the same as #[repr(C)]
In #92972 we enabled linting on unused fields in tuple structs. In #118297 that lint was enabled by default. That exposed issues like #119659, where the fields of a struct marked `#[repr(transparent)]` were reported by the `dead_code` lint. The language team [decided](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119659#issuecomment-1885172045) that the lint should treat `repr(transparent)` the same as `#[repr(C)]`.
Fixes#119659
Optimize large array creation in const-eval
This changes repeated memcpy's to a memset for the case that we're propagating a single byte into a region of memory. It also optimizes the element-by-element copies to have a tighter loop; I'm pretty sure the old code was actually doing a multiply within each loop iteration.
For an 8GB array (`static SLICE: [u8; SIZE] = [0u8; 1 << 33];`) this takes us from ~23 seconds to ~6 seconds locally, which is spent roughly 50/50 in (a) memset to zero and (b) memcpy of the original place into a new place, when popping stack frame. The latter seems hard to avoid but is a big memcpy (since we're copying the type rather than initializing a region, so it's pretty fast), and the first is as good as it's going to get without special casing constant-valued arrays.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55795. (That issue's references to lint checking don't appear true anymore, but I think this closes that case as something that is slow due to *time* pretty fully. An 8GB array taking only 6 seconds feels reasonable enough to not merit further tracking).
Get rid of the hir_owner query.
This query was meant as a firewall between `hir_owner_nodes` which is supposed to change often, and the queries that only depend on the item signature. That firewall was inefficient, leaking the contents of the HIR body through `HirId`s.
`hir_owner` incurs a significant cost, as we need to hash HIR twice in multiple modes. This PR proposes to remove it, and simplify the hashing scheme.
For the future, `def_kind`, `def_span`... are much more efficient for incremental decoupling, and should be preferred.
change `.unwrap()` to `?` on write where `fmt::Result` is returned
Fixes#120090 which points out that some of the `.unwrap()`s in `rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs` are likely meant to be `?`s
Remove `next_root_ty_var`
Uhh we seem to not have any test that relies on this anymore. Maybe due to the way we changed alias-relate or whatever.
Removing this hack helper fn because #119106 is the general solution.
r? lcnr
Improved collapse_debuginfo attribute, added command-line flag
Improved attribute collapse_debuginfo with variants: `#[collapse_debuginfo=(no|external|yes)]`.
Added command-line flag for default behaviour.
Work-in-progress: will add more tests.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100758
[rustc_data_structures] Use partition_point to find slice range end.
This PR uses approach introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114152 to find
the end of the range. It's much easier to understand and reason about invariants of such
implementation.
Technically it's possible to make it even shorter by returning `&[start..end]` unconditionally
because even if searched item is not present in the slice, `start` and `end` would point at
the same index, so the range would be empty. The reason I decided not to use this shorter
implementation is because it would involve more comparisons in case there are no elements
in the slice with key equal to `key`.
Also, not that it matters much, but this implementation also improves perf according to the
benchmark below:
https://gist.github.com/ttsugriy/63c0ed39ae132b131931fa1f8a3dea55
The results on my M1 macbook air are:
```
Running benches/bin_search_slice_benchmark.rs (target/release/deps/bin_search_slice_benchmark-90fa6d68c3bd1298)
Benchmarking multiply add/binary_search_slice: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0002 s (1
multiply add/binary_search_slice
time: [44.719 ns 44.918 ns 45.158 ns]
No change in performance detected.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
Benchmarking multiply add/binary_search_slice_new: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0001
multiply add/binary_search_slice_new
time: [36.955 ns 37.060 ns 37.221 ns]
No change in performance detected.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
```
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119172 (Detect `NulInCStr` error earlier.)
- #119833 (Make tcx optional from StableMIR run macro and extend it to accept closures)
- #119967 (Add `PatKind::Err` to AST/HIR)
- #119978 (Move async closure parameters into the resultant closure's future eagerly)
- #120021 (don't store const var origins for known vars)
- #120038 (Don't create a separate "basename" when naming and opening a MIR dump file)
- #120057 (Don't ICE when deducing future output if other errors already occurred)
- #120073 (Remove spastorino from users_on_vacation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
error on incorrect implied bounds in wfcheck except for Bevy dependents
Rebase of #109763
Additionally, special cases Bevy `ParamSet` types to not trigger the lint. This is tracked in #119956.
Fixes#109628
Don't ICE when deducing future output if other errors already occurred
The situation can't really happen outside of erroneous code. What was interesting is that it ICEd before emitting any other diagnostics. This was because the other errors were silenced due to cycle_delay_bug cycle errors.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
fixes#119890
Don't create a separate "basename" when naming and opening a MIR dump file
These functions were split up by #77080, in order to support passing the dump file's “basename” (filename without extension) to the implementation of `-Zdump-mir-spanview`, so that it could be used as a page title.
That flag has since been removed (#119566), so now there's no particular reason for this code to handle the basename separately from the filename or full path.
This PR therefore restores things to (roughly) how they were before #77080.
Move async closure parameters into the resultant closure's future eagerly
Move async closure parameters into the closure's resultant future eagerly.
Before, we used to desugar `async |p1, p2, ..| { body }` as `|p1, p2, ..| { || async { body } }`. Now, we desugar the above like `|p1, p2, ..| { async move { let p1 = p1; let p2 = p2; ... body } }`. This mirrors the same desugaring that `async fn` does with its parameter types, and the compiler literally uses the same code via a shared helper function.
This removes the necessity for E0708, since now expressions like `async |x: i32| { x }` will not give you confusing borrow errors.
This does *not* fix the case where async closures have self-borrows. This will come with a general implementation of async closures, which is still in the works.
r? oli-obk
Make tcx optional from StableMIR run macro and extend it to accept closures
Change `run` macro to avoid sometimes unnecessary dependency on `TyCtxt`, and introduce `run_with_tcx` to capture use cases where `tcx` is required. Additionally, extend both macros to accept closures that may capture variables.
I've also modified the `internal()` method to make it safer, by accepting the type context to force the `'tcx` lifetime to match the context lifetime.
These are non-backward compatible changes, but they only affect internal APIs which are provided today as helper functions until we have a stable API to start the compiler.
Detect `NulInCStr` error earlier.
By making it an `EscapeError` instead of a `LitError`. This makes it like the other errors produced when checking string literals contents, e.g. for invalid escape sequences or bare CR chars.
NOTE: this means these errors are issued earlier, before expansion, which changes behaviour. It will be possible to move the check back to the later point if desired. If that happens, it's likely that all the string literal contents checks will be delayed together.
One nice thing about this: the old approach had some code in `report_lit_error` to calculate the span of the nul char from a range. This code used a hardwired `+2` to account for the `c"` at the start of a C string literal, but this should have changed to a `+3` for raw C string literals to account for the `cr"`, which meant that the caret in `cr"` nul error messages was one short of where it should have been. The new approach doesn't need any of this and avoids the off-by-one error.
r? ```@fee1-dead```
